Health and Environment Committee

Portfolio Committee

View on parliament.qld.gov.au

Bills Reviewed (10)

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 35, 57th Parliament-Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Surgeons) Amendment Bill 20232023-06-02

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed, finding it would meet its policy objectives of protecting the title 'surgeon' within the medical profession and strengthening the regulation of cosmetic surgery in Australia. The committee heard divergent views from medical peak bodies, training organisations, lawyers and insurers, but noted broad agreement that protecting the public from harm caused by unqualified or underqualified practitioners was paramount. The committee was satisfied that any limitations on human rights were reasonable and justified, and that the delegation of legislative power to the Ministerial Council was appropriate.

Key findings
  • The majority of stakeholders supported the proposed changes, though medical bodies could not reach agreement on which practitioners should be permitted to use the title 'surgeon'.
  • There were no minimum standards for who could call themselves a cosmetic 'surgeon', and the public expected all surgeons to have comparable qualifications and advanced surgical training.
  • The committee acknowledged the vital role of rural generalists but accepted that the initial surgical classes were determined by health ministers on expert advice, and that rural GPs could still perform surgeries within their scope of practice.
  • The committee found the delegation of power to the Ministerial Council to prescribe additional surgical classes was appropriate, noting safeguards including tabling in the Queensland Parliament.
  • The bill also clarifies tribunal decision-making powers under section 196 of the National Law, and the committee found this appropriately balanced practitioner privacy rights with consumer protection.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Surgeons) Amendment Bill 2023 be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Amendment Bill 2023Recommended passagePASSED with amendment

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 32, 57th Parliament-Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Amendment Bill 2023, government response2023-05-24

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 32, 57th Parliament-Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Amendment Bill 2023: Erratum2023-05-15

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 32, 57th Parliament-Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Amendment Bill 20232023-05-05

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined the Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Amendment Bill 2023 and recommended it be passed. The committee made two additional recommendations: improved alignment between the Medicines and Poisons Act 2019 and the Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Act 1998 to streamline enforcement powers, and enhanced resourcing for coordinated enforcement efforts targeting illicit tobacco and vaping markets. The Government supported both additional recommendations in principle.

Key findings
  • The bill introduces a licensing scheme for wholesale and retail sales of smoking products, including e-cigarettes, with a staggered commencement through to September 2025.
  • Submitters broadly supported the licensing scheme but suggested improvements, including distinguishing between different retailer types and expanding factors considered when granting licences.
  • The committee identified a need for better alignment between enforcement powers under the Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Act 1998 and the Medicines and Poisons Act 2019, particularly regarding e-cigarette regulation.
  • The bill strengthens protections for children by prohibiting the supply of smoking products both by and to children, including by parents or guardians.
  • The Government committed to establishing a dedicated intelligence capability unit within Queensland Health and developing a memorandum of understanding with the Queensland Police Service for coordinated enforcement.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Amendment Bill 2023 be passed.
  • The committee recommends improved alignment of the Medicines and Poisons Act 2019 and the Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Act 1998 to remove barriers to executing warrants, searching premises and seizing contraband items.
  • The committee recommends that the Government fully consider resourcing enhanced enforcement efforts coordinated between Queensland Health and the Queensland Police Service, and between the relevant state and federal agencies targeting illicit tobacco and vaping markets.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 29, 57th Parliament-Health and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022, government response2023-04-18

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 29, 57th Parliament-Health and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20222023-02-24

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined the Health and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022 and recommended it be passed, making five recommendations in total. The committee held public briefings and hearings in December 2022 and January 2023, receiving submissions from stakeholders including the Queensland Nurses and Midwives' Union. While broadly supportive of the bill's reforms across multiple health Acts, the committee made additional recommendations on staff wellbeing reporting, transparency around medicines information disclosure, Mental Health Review Tribunal resourcing, and prioritising skin cancer data collection. The government supported all recommendations.

Key findings
  • The bill amends five separate Acts covering hospital staff wellbeing, healthcare security powers, medicines and poisons regulation, mental health tribunal proceedings, cancer data collection, and school vision screening.
  • The Queensland Nurses and Midwives' Union highlighted workplace violence, demanding workloads, moral distress and fatigue/burnout as key wellbeing issues for the public health workforce.
  • The committee identified human rights considerations around security officers' powers to direct people to leave public health facilities, particularly the right to access health services without discrimination.
  • Stakeholders called for all basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas to be made notifiable cancers, given Queensland has the highest rate of skin cancer in Australia.
  • The government response supported all five committee recommendations, either fully or in principle.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Health and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022 be passed.
  • The committee recommends that Hospital and Health Services and Hospital and Health Boards regularly report on their progress on supporting staff health, safety and wellbeing, at a minimum in their annual reports.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister outline in her second reading speech the process for assessing any requests for disclosure of information on the administrative action register, as proposed by clause 13 of the Bill, and how the chief executive will determine whether it is in the public interest to disclose information.
  • The committee recommends that resources for technical and/or administrative support be provided to the Mental Health Review Tribunal to make recordings and/or transcriptions of proceedings.
  • The committee recommends that Queensland Health consider, as a priority, the inclusion of all basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas as notifiable cancers in future amendments of the Public Health Regulation 2018.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 31, 57th Parliament-Waste Reduction and Recycling and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20232023-04-14

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined the Waste Reduction and Recycling and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 over approximately seven weeks, holding public briefings and a public hearing and receiving 16 submissions. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding that submitters were broadly supportive of the bill's aims, including removing the clean earth levy exemption, banning outdoor balloon releases, setting an expiry for single-use plastic exemptions, and enshrining circular economy principles in legislation. LNP committee members filed a Statement of Reservation criticising the government for failing to release a legally required waste strategy review on time and highlighting that Queensland was on track to meet only two of its nine waste targets.

Key findings
  • Submitters broadly supported the bill's objectives but held divergent views on whether the reforms went far enough to secure best practice environmental outcomes.
  • Removing the automatic clean earth levy exemption was supported by stakeholders as an incentive for reuse over disposal, with an operational purposes exemption available for landfill operators who use clean earth beneficially.
  • The ban on outdoor release of lighter-than-air balloons was widely supported by environmental groups and was found to have sufficient regard to fundamental legislative principles.
  • The government's overdue waste strategy review, once released, found Queensland was on track to meet only two of nine waste targets, with household waste to landfill increasing and municipal recycling rates declining from 31 per cent to 27 per cent since 2018.
  • Stakeholders supported including circular economy principles in the Act but some argued the bill's definition omitted key participants such as consumers and secondary resource markets.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Waste Reduction and Recycling and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 be passed.
Dissenting views: LNP members Sam O'Connor (Bonney) and Rob Molhoek (Southport) filed a Statement of Reservation criticising the Palaszczuk Government for failing to meet its own legislative requirements to review the waste management strategy. They noted the overdue review was only released after the opposition raised the omission, and that it revealed Queensland was on track to meet just two of nine waste targets. They highlighted that more household waste was going to landfill than before the waste levy was announced, and that municipal solid waste recycling rates had declined from 31 per cent to 27 per cent. They also shared the LGAQ's concerns about broadening the definition of misinformation under section 73DE.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 27, 57th Parliament-Environmental Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022, government response2023-02-13

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 27, 57th Parliament-Environmental Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20222022-11-25

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined the bill over six weeks, receiving 29 submissions primarily focused on proposed amendments to the Environmental Protection Act 1994. The committee recommended the bill be passed, while asking the Minister to address concerns about clause 105 (environmental offences) and the adequacy of defences in section 493 of the EP Act. The government accepted both recommendations.

Key findings
  • Submitters were primarily concerned with the bill's proposed amendments to the Environmental Protection Act 1994.
  • The bill proposed increasing the threshold for material environmental harm from $5,000 to $10,000 and for serious environmental harm from $50,000 to $100,000, with annual CPI indexation.
  • Concerns were raised about whether fewer harmful activities would reach the increased threshold amounts and whether exceptions should apply where the nature of harm is significant regardless of value.
  • The department advised that the threshold changes would only affect how harm is categorised, not the department's ability to enforce against environmental harm.
  • Transitional provisions for progressive rehabilitation and closure plans (PRCPs) under the Mineral and Energy Resources (Financial Provisioning) Act 2018 were identified as the most urgent provisions in the bill.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Environmental Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022 be passed.
  • The committee recommends the Minister for the Environment and the Great Barrier Reef and Minister for Science and Youth Affairs take note of the committee's comments and, in her second reading speech, address the issues raised about the proposed amendment in clause 105 of the bill and the adequacy of defences in section 493 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 24, 57th Parliament-Public Health and Other Legislation (COVID-19 Management) Amendment Bill 20222022-10-14

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee received 57 submissions and recommended the bill be passed. The bill sought to replace the temporary emergency legislative framework for managing COVID-19 with new, more targeted powers for the Chief Health Officer to issue public health directions until 31 October 2023, along with extended emergency measures in corrective services facilities. While health sector organisations broadly supported the bill, concerns were raised about the lack of a definition for 'serious risk', the granting of powers to the Chief Health Officer rather than an elected representative, and the impact of extended emergency powers on prisoners. Opposition members filed dissenting reports arguing that emergency powers were no longer justified given the changed state of the pandemic.

Key findings
  • Health sector organisations broadly supported the bill, while most submissions opposing it argued the emergency situation no longer justified such powers
  • Some submitters were concerned that 'serious risk' was not defined in the bill, leaving its meaning to the Chief Health Officer's discretion
  • Human rights concerns were raised about exemptions from health directions, the right of review, disproportionate restrictions on residents of care facilities, and enforcement powers
  • The committee was satisfied that the bill achieved a balance between enabling necessary public health powers and protecting human rights
  • The committee encouraged the government to consider retaining the broader scope of pharmacy services enabled during the pandemic, particularly for rural and remote communities
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Public Health and Other Legislation (COVID-19 Management) Amendment Bill 2022 be passed.
Dissenting views: Two dissenting reports were filed. Opposition members Rob Molhoek MP and Sam O'Connor MP argued that the pandemic had shifted so greatly that the legislation could no longer be justified, noting that Parliament could be recalled swiftly to pass emergency legislation if a new variant posed a significant threat. Stephen Andrew MP opposed the ongoing use of emergency powers on principle, arguing they were inappropriate in a democracy, that such powers should only be exercised by an elected representative accountable to the people rather than the Chief Health Officer, and that the bill's broadly worded phrases such as 'serious risk' were not properly defined.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 21, 57th Parliament-Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022, government response2022-10-12

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 21, 57th Parliament-Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022, interim government response2022-09-30

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 21, 57th Parliament-Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022: Erratum2022-08-01

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 21, 57th Parliament-Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20222022-07-01

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The committee also recommended that provisions repealing the prohibition on testimonials in health service advertising not commence until an independent review of cosmetic surgery regulation was completed. The government supported this in principle, and Health Ministers from all jurisdictions subsequently agreed to withdraw the testimonial advertising clauses entirely. The committee heard from stakeholders including the QNMU, AMA, and Avant Mutual across a range of issues including practitioner registration, complaints management, and public register protections.

Key findings
  • The bill amends the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, which governs 16 health professions and approximately 168,000 practitioners in Queensland.
  • Stakeholders including the QNMU, AMA, AAP, and Avant Mutual broadly supported the bill's reforms.
  • Concerns were raised about repealing the prohibition on testimonials in health service advertising before the completion of the Independent review of cosmetic surgery regulation.
  • Avant Mutual raised concerns that practitioners should be given notice and an opportunity to be heard before a National Board re-publishes previously excluded information on the public register.
  • Health Ministers from all states and territories agreed on 2 September 2022 to withdraw the testimonial advertising provisions to ensure consistency with broader cosmetic surgery protections.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022 be passed.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister for Health and Ambulance Services provides an undertaking, during the second reading debate, to not commence the provisions repealing the prohibition on testimonials in health service advertising until the completion of the Independent review of the regulation of health practitioners in cosmetic surgery, and the accompanying guidelines and educational material have been published.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2021Recommended passagePASSED

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 14, 57th Parliament-Environmental and Other Legislation (Reversal of Great Barrier Reef Protection Measures) Amendment Bill 20212021-10-20

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 10, 57th Parliament-Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2021, government response2021-09-14

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 10, 57th Parliament-Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 20212021-08-20

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2021 over three months, receiving over 6,000 submissions and holding public hearings across regional and south-east Queensland. The committee recommended the bill be passed without amendment, finding it struck an appropriate balance between providing end-of-life choice for terminally ill Queenslanders and safeguarding vulnerable persons. The committee also called on the Commonwealth Government to amend the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) to clarify that voluntary assisted dying is not suicide, and urged the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions to issue charging guidelines so that practitioners using telehealth would not face prosecution. Three committee members filed dissenting views opposing the bill.

Key findings
  • The committee found strong community support for voluntary assisted dying legislation, building on a previous parliamentary inquiry that received nearly 5,000 submissions with the majority supporting reform
  • The bill's eligibility criteria, assessment processes and safeguards were considered well-balanced, drawing on the Queensland Law Reform Commission's legal framework (Report No. 79)
  • Stakeholders raised concerns about equitable access to the scheme for people in regional, rural, remote and Indigenous communities, and the committee encouraged Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representation during implementation
  • The committee endorsed the principle that high-quality palliative care should be available to all Queenslanders and noted additional government funding for palliative care services
  • Commonwealth telecommunications law was identified as a barrier to delivering the scheme via telehealth in regional areas, prompting the committee's recommendations to the Commonwealth Government
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2021 be passed.
  • The committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government amend the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) by inserting a definition declaring that 'suicide' does not include voluntary assisted dying carried out lawfully pursuant to a law of a state or territory.
  • The committee recommends that as a matter of urgency the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions issue prosecutorial charging guidelines indicating that the offences in sections 474.29A and 474.29B of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) will not be prosecuted where a doctor or other person is acting in accordance with the procedure outlined in state or territory voluntary assisted dying laws.
Dissenting views: Three committee members dissented. Stephen Andrew MP (Member for Mirani) opposed the bill, arguing it was fundamentally flawed and would lead to wrongful deaths, increased suicide rates, and further underfunding of palliative care. He raised concerns about the burden on institutions with conscientious objections and the lack of specialist involvement. Dr Mark Robinson MP (Member for Oodgeroo) filed a detailed dissenting report recommending the bill not be passed, arguing it would create exceptions to murder and suicide laws and that safeguards were inadequate to protect vulnerable people. Rob Molhoek MP (Deputy Chair, Member for Southport) filed a statement of reservation acknowledging both the deeply personal nature of the issue and significant concerns about the legislation, including palliative care access, the capacity of the health system, and a number of unconsidered amendments raised by stakeholders.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 4, 57th Parliament-Public Health and Other Legislation (Extension of Expiring Provisions) Amendment Bill 20202021-02-12

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined the bill over approximately two months, receiving 124 written submissions and holding a public hearing with 16 witnesses. The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting strong support from health sector organisations for extending the Chief Health Officer's emergency powers to respond to COVID-19 until September 2021. However, a significant number of written submissions opposed the bill, raising concerns about the extent of emergency powers, impacts on civil liberties, government transparency, hotel quarantine conditions, and the broader social and economic effects of public health restrictions.

Key findings
  • Health sector organisations including AMA Queensland, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, and the Queensland Nurses and Midwives' Union supported extending emergency powers to maintain Queensland's effective COVID-19 response.
  • A majority of written submissions (approximately 87 per cent) opposed the bill, raising concerns about the proportionality of emergency powers, impacts on democratic freedoms, and the lack of clear criteria for when powers would no longer be needed.
  • The Queensland Human Rights Commissioner and Mental Health Commissioner expressed reservations about government transparency and the need for greater access to the data and health advice underpinning public health directions.
  • Stakeholders raised significant concerns about hotel quarantine conditions, including access to fresh air, mental health support, and the financial burden on individuals required to pay their own quarantine costs.
  • The committee examined the bill's compatibility with the Human Rights Act 2019, finding that limitations on rights including freedom of movement, liberty and security, and peaceful assembly were justified by the purpose of protecting public health.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Public Health and Other Legislation (Extension of Expiring Provisions) Amendment Bill 2020 be passed.
Dissenting views: Stephen Andrew MP (Member for Mirani) filed a dissenting report arguing that emergency powers were disproportionate given Queensland's low case numbers, that the government lacked transparency about the health advice underpinning its decisions, and that the committee's report overstated stakeholder support for the bill. He raised concerns about the concentration of power in unelected public health officials, the undermining of fundamental legal principles including due process and habeas corpus, and the risk of emergency powers becoming normalised and permanent.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 3, 57th Parliament-Waste Reduction and Recycling (Plastic Items) Amendment Bill 20202021-02-12

Committee findings

The Health and Environment Committee examined this bill in the 57th Parliament, building on a comprehensive inquiry by the former Natural Resources, Agricultural Industry Development and Environment Committee in the 56th Parliament. All 13 submissions unanimously supported the proposed ban on single-use plastic items. The committee recommended the bill be passed, endorsing the earlier committee's five recommendations including expanding the ban to cover expanded polystyrene takeaway food containers.

Key findings
  • All 13 submissions to the inquiry unanimously supported the principle of banning certain single-use plastic items including plates, bowls, cutlery, straws and stirrers.
  • Stakeholders and the government supported expanding the ban to include expanded polystyrene takeaway food containers in the first tranche of banned items.
  • The National Retail Association and other industry groups called for education and engagement campaigns to accompany the ban, with adequate lead time for businesses to source alternatives.
  • Several submitters opposed the exemption for schools and shelf-ready packaged products, arguing these should also be included in the ban.
  • Public consultation attracted nearly 20,000 responses, with 94 per cent showing overwhelming support for introducing the ban.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Waste Reduction and Recycling (Plastic Items) Amendment Bill 2020 be passed.
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be amended to include expanded polystyrene takeaway food containers in the first tranche of banned single-use plastic items.
  • The committee recommends that the Queensland Government work with other stakeholders within the Australian Packaging Covenant Organisation to accelerate support for businesses to transition away from single-use plastic items, including expanded polystyrene products.
  • The committee recommends that the Department of Environment and Science review the exemption of schools from the ban on the supply of single-use plastic items as part of the two year review.
  • The committee recommends that the Department of Environment and Science review the penalties for providing false or misleading information about single-use plastic items as part of the two year review.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Other Reports (40)

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 44, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 13 September 2023 and 10 October 2023

Subordinate Legislation2023-12-05

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 43, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 23 August 2023 and 12 September 2023

Subordinate Legislation2023-11-10

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 42, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 14 June 2023 and 22 August 2023

Subordinate Legislation2023-11-10

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 41, 57th Parliament-Annual Report 2022-23

Other2023-11-03

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 38, 57th Parliament-Vaping: An inquiry into reducing rates of e-cigarette use in Queensland, government response

Inquiry2023-10-25

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 40, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 24 May 2023 and 13 June 2023

Subordinate Legislation2023-09-20

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 39, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 19 April 2023 and 23 May 2023

Subordinate Legislation2023-09-20

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 38, 57th Parliament-Vaping: An inquiry into reducing rates of e-cigarette use in Queensland

Inquiry2023-08-31

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 37, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 15 March 2023 and 18 April 2023

Subordinate Legislation2023-08-23

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 36, 57th Parliament-2023-24 Budget Estimates-Volume of Additional Information

Other2023-08-18

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 36, 57th Parliament-2023-24 Budget Estimates

Other2023-08-18

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 34, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 22 February 2023 and 14 March 2023

Subordinate Legislation2023-05-05

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 33, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 30 November 2022 and 21 February 2023

Subordinate Legislation2023-05-05

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 30, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 13 October 2022 and 29 November 2022

Subordinate Legislation2023-02-28

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 28, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 17 August 2022 and 12 October 2022

Subordinate Legislation2022-12-06

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 26, 57th Parliament-Annual Report 2021-22

Other2022-11-04

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 25, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 22 June 2022 and 16 August 2022

Subordinate Legislation2022-10-24

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 18, 57th Parliament-Inquiry into the provision of primary, allied and private health care, aged care and NDIS care services and its impact on the Queensland public health system, final government response

Inquiry2022-10-07

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 23, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 11 May 2022 and 21 June 2022

Subordinate Legislation2022-09-06

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 22, 57th Parliament-2022-23 Budget Estimates-Volume of Additional Information

Other2022-08-12

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 22, 57th Parliament-2022-23 Budget Estimates

Other2022-08-12

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 20, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 March 2022 and 10 May 2022

Subordinate Legislation2022-06-28

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 19, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 17 November 2021 and 15 March 2022

Subordinate Legislation2022-05-18

Health and Environment Committee, Report No. 18, 57th Parliament-Inquiry into the provision of primary, allied and private health care, aged care and NDIS care services and its impact on the Queensland public health system, interim government response

Inquiry2022-05-11

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 18, 57th Parliament-Inquiry into the provision of primary, allied and private health care, aged care and NDIS care services and its impact on the Queensland public health system

Inquiry2022-04-08

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 17, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 13 October 2021 and 16 November 2021

Subordinate Legislation2022-03-01

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 16, 57th Parliament-Subordinate Legislation tabled between 1 September 2021 and 12 October 2021

Subordinate Legislation2022-01-31

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 15, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 June 2021 and 31 August 2021

Subordinate Legislation2021-10-28

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 13, 57th Parliament-Annual Report 2020-21

Other2021-10-18

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 12, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 12 May 2021 and 15 June 2021

Subordinate Legislation2021-09-29

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 11, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 21 April and 11 May 2021

Subordinate Legislation2021-09-02

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 9, 57th Parliament-2021-22 Budget Estimates-Volume of Additional Information

Other2021-08-20

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 9, 57th Parliament-2021-22 Budget Estimates

Other2021-08-20

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 8, 57th Parliament-Subordinate Legislation tabled between 24 February 2021 and 20 April 2021

Subordinate Legislation2021-05-25

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 7, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled on 23 February 2021

Subordinate Legislation2021-04-27

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 6, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled on 26 November 2020

Subordinate Legislation2021-03-25

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 5, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 15 July and 8 September 2020

Subordinate Legislation2021-02-12

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 2, 57th Parliament-2020-21 Budget Estimates-Volume of Additional Information

Other2021-02-12

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 2, 57th Parliament-2020-21 Budget Estimates

Other2021-02-12

Health and Environment Committee: Report No. 1, 57th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled on 14 July 2020

Subordinate Legislation2020-11-30