Finance and Administration Committee

Portfolio Committee

View on parliament.qld.gov.au

Bills Reviewed (24)

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 48, 55th Parliament - Appropriation (Parliament) Bill (No. 2) 2017 and Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 20172017-10-11

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The bill sought supplementary appropriation of $2.411 million for unforeseen expenditure by the Legislative Assembly and Parliamentary Service in 2016-17, primarily for the Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis Select Committee, salary increases following the Queensland Independent Remuneration Tribunal's determination, lift upgrades in the Parliamentary Annexe, and IT system upgrades. No submissions were received and no fundamental legislative principle issues were identified.

Key findings
  • The unforeseen expenditure of $2.411 million covered additional funding for the Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis Select Committee, salary increases for members of parliament, and infrastructure upgrades.
  • The bill was examined alongside the Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2017, which sought $2.270 billion in supplementary appropriation for departments.
  • No public submissions were received during the inquiry.
  • The committee found no fundamental legislative principle issues with the bill.
  • The bill was declared urgent, with the committee given approximately five weeks to report.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Appropriation (Parliament) Bill (No. 2) 2017 be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 46, 55th Parliament - Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20172017-10-05

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill following the independent Best Practice Review of Workplace Health and Safety Queensland. The committee received 29 submissions and held a public hearing with extensive stakeholder participation, including families affected by workplace fatalities. The committee was unable to reach agreement on whether the bill should be passed. Government members strongly supported the bill, while non-government members rejected it entirely.

Key findings
  • The bill sought to introduce industrial manslaughter as a new offence in Queensland, making it the first jurisdiction in Australia to include such an offence in occupational safety legislation
  • The bill implemented recommendations from the independent Best Practice Review of Workplace Health and Safety Queensland conducted by Tim Lyons, which made 58 recommendations
  • Unions strongly supported the bill's provisions, while employer groups and industry bodies raised concerns about costs to business and the efficacy of industrial manslaughter provisions
  • The Queensland Law Society and Bar Association raised legal concerns about the construction and scope of the proposed industrial manslaughter offence
  • Families who had lost loved ones in workplace incidents presented to the committee and fully supported the bill, particularly the industrial manslaughter provisions
Dissenting views: Government members filed a statement of reservation supporting the bill, arguing it would strengthen workplace safety and hold senior executives accountable for negligent practices causing worker deaths. Non-government members rejected the bill entirely, characterising it as union-building legislation that was legally flawed (citing concerns from the Queensland Law Society and Bar Association), would add costs to industry, and would not prevent industrial deaths. They pointed to the ACT's similar law which had not resulted in a single successful prosecution since 2004.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 44, 55th Parliament - Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation (Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017, government response2017-08-23

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed, with several additional recommendations. The bill addressed workers' compensation reforms for coal workers with pneumoconiosis (black lung disease), including new lump sum payments, the ability to reopen statutory claims where disease progresses, and provisions for medical examinations. The government accepted most recommendations, including amending the bill to ensure coal workers do not bear travel costs for medical examinations, but did not support legislating cost apportionment for medical examinations across multiple employers.

Key findings
  • The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting it introduced important protections for coal workers suffering from pneumoconiosis.
  • The committee sought clarity on the common law 'once and for all rule' as it applies to workers with progressive dust-related diseases, and the government confirmed statutory claim reopening provisions address this without affecting common law claims.
  • The committee recommended the bill be amended to ensure reasonable travel costs for medical examinations are not borne by coal workers, which the government accepted.
  • The government did not support legislating cost apportionment for medical examinations where miners had worked at multiple sites, preferring administrative arrangements.
  • The committee requested the Minister update the House on progress in establishing an Australian B reader program for interpreting chest X-rays.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation (Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
  • That the Minister update the House on the progress to date in establishing and implementing an Australian B reader program.
  • That the Minister provide clarity around the application of the common law 'once and for all rule' to sufferers of dust-related diseases who have received compensation under common law where the disease progresses or the sufferer develops a new disease.
  • That the bill be amended to provide clarity on who bears responsibility for medical examination costs for miners who demonstrate six months of exposure to coal dust at more than one worksite in Queensland, and to ensure reasonable travel costs incurred to attend the medical examinations are not borne by the coal worker.
  • That the Minister clarify the intent of proposed section 727, including whether it is to exclude workers who have been assessed under section 179 of the WCR Act before the commencement of the Act from accessing the lump sum payment and additional lump sum payments.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 44, 55th Parliament - Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation (Coal Workers'Pneumoconiosis) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20172017-08-11

Committee findings

The Education, Employment and Small Business Committee examined the bill over six weeks, receiving eleven submissions and holding a public hearing with legal and union stakeholders. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed, finding it appropriately implements twelve recommendations from the Peetz review of the workers' compensation scheme. Key areas of scrutiny included changes to psychological injury definitions, early intervention requirements for insurers, rehabilitation and return to work obligations, and the extension of workers' compensation coverage to unpaid interns.

Key findings
  • Seven of eleven submitters broadly supported the proposed changes to workers' compensation, while the remaining four raised specific concerns without opposing the bill overall.
  • The committee accepted that aligning the psychological injury definition with other Australian jurisdictions (removing 'the major' qualifying factor) was unlikely to significantly increase accepted claims.
  • Stakeholders broadly supported requiring insurers to provide early intervention support for psychological injury claims before the claim is decided, though some raised concerns about excluded hospital costs.
  • The Queensland Law Society and Housing Industry Association raised concerns about whether employer apologies or expressions of regret could be used as evidence in criminal prosecutions under workplace health and safety laws.
  • The committee found that extending workers' compensation to unpaid commercial interns would cost an estimated $140,000 to $185,000 across the scheme, with minimal impact on employer premiums.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Appropriation Bill 2021Recommended passagePASSED

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 43, 55th Parliament - 2017-18 Budget Estimates - Appropriation Bill2017-08-04

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 27, 55th Parliament - 2016-17 Budget Estimates - Appropriation Bill2016-08-12

Committee findings

The Economics and Governance Committee examined the 2021-22 budget estimates for its portfolio areas covering Premier and Cabinet, Treasury and Investment, and Tourism Industry Development, Innovation and Sport. The committee conducted a public hearing on 16 July 2021 and considered questions on notice from three Ministers. The committee recommended that the proposed expenditures be agreed to by the Legislative Assembly without amendment. LNP members filed a Statement of Reservation agreeing with passing the budget but criticising the Government's approach to health, business support during COVID lockdowns, housing, crime, and tourism funding cuts.

Key findings
  • The committee examined expenditure across three portfolios: Premier and Cabinet, Treasury and Investment, and Tourism Industry Development, Innovation and Sport
  • Key issues included Queensland Health's sustainability, the COVID-19 health and economic response, ambulance services, and support for small businesses during lockdowns
  • The committee scrutinised Treasury matters including Queensland's debt position, the corporatisation of the Titles Registry, the state's credit rating, and budget savings measures
  • Tourism portfolio scrutiny focused on funding cuts to Tourism and Events Queensland, the status of ecotourism projects, and the lack of updated tourism strategies post-COVID
  • The committee also examined preparations and community consultation around Brisbane's bid for the 2032 Olympic Games
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the proposed expenditures, as detailed in the Appropriation Bill 2021 for the committee's areas of responsibility, be agreed to by the Legislative Assembly without amendment.
Dissenting views: LNP members (Ray Stevens, Michael Crandon, and Dan Purdie) filed a Statement of Reservation. While agreeing with passing the budget, they criticised the Government for failing to address the health system crisis including ambulance ramping, not providing adequate COVID support payments to small and family businesses, cutting Tourism and Events Queensland funding by $37 million and tourism staff by 19 percent, underfunding community sporting organisations, and lacking long-term planning for tourism post-COVID and ahead of the 2032 Olympics. They also raised concerns about transparency around the Titles Office valuation and government dealings with lobbyists.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Appropriation (Parliament) Bill 2021Recommended passagePASSED

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 42, 55th Parliament - 2017-18 Budget Estimates - Appropriation (Parliament) Bill2017-08-04

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 26, 55th Parliament - 2016-17 Budget Estimates - Appropriation (Parliament) Bill2016-08-12

Committee findings

The Economics and Governance Committee examined the 2021-22 budget estimates for the Legislative Assembly and Parliamentary Service, which totalled $106.3 million. The committee conducted a question on notice process and a public hearing on 16 July 2021, taking evidence from the Speaker and parliamentary officers. The committee recommended that the proposed expenditure be agreed to without amendment. LNP members filed a Statement of Reservation agreeing with the budget but raising broader concerns about health, crime, tourism, and government accountability.

Key findings
  • The budgeted expenditure for the Legislative Assembly and Parliamentary Service for 2021-22 was $106.3 million, a slight decrease of $219,000 from the previous year.
  • A major focus was the planned refurbishment of the Parliamentary Annexe, with $41 million earmarked for 2022-23 works including facade repairs and internal upgrades to Members' offices.
  • Capital expenditure of $7.9 million was planned for 2021-22, including critical building infrastructure upgrades, IT network replacement, and security system improvements.
  • The committee examined a wide range of operational matters including electorate office improvements, parliamentary education initiatives, security assessments, and public access to catering facilities.
  • Non-committee Members Michael Berkman MP and Jarrod Bleijie MP participated in the hearing, providing additional scrutiny of the estimates.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the proposed expenditure for the Legislative Assembly and Parliamentary Service, as detailed in the Appropriation (Parliament) Bill 2021, be agreed to by the Legislative Assembly without amendment.
Dissenting views: LNP members (Ray Stevens, Michael Crandon, and Dan Purdie) filed a Statement of Reservation. While agreeing with passing the budget, they raised concerns about Parliamentary Service working conditions, the Microsoft Teams telephony rollout, and broader government issues including health system pressures, insufficient COVID business support, tourism funding cuts of $37 million, and underfunding of community sport organisations.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Labour Hire Licensing Bill 2017PASSED with amendment

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 41, 55th Parliament - Labour Hire Licensing Bill 20172017-07-24

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving 41 submissions and holding a public hearing. The bill proposed a licensing scheme to regulate the provision of labour hire services and protect workers from exploitation. The committee was unable to agree that the bill be passed. Government members strongly supported the bill, citing evidence of widespread exploitation in the labour hire industry. Non-government members opposed it, arguing it was unnecessary and would primarily serve to empower the union movement.

Key findings
  • The bill followed the committee's own 2016 inquiry into the practices of the labour hire industry in Queensland, which found evidence of underpayment, sham contracting, phoenixing and exploitation of workers
  • Stakeholders were divided on whether a state-based licensing scheme was appropriate, with some preferring a national approach or self-regulation
  • The bill proposed requiring labour hire operators to be licensed, with fit and proper person tests, financial viability requirements, and compliance history checks
  • Government members argued that self-regulation had failed and a licensing scheme was needed, while non-government members argued existing Fair Work laws and better enforcement would be more effective
  • Several submitters raised concerns about the breadth of the definition of labour hire services in the bill and its potential to capture arrangements not intended to be covered
Dissenting views: Government members filed a statement of reservation strongly supporting the bill, arguing it was a necessary response to evidence of exploitation and that self-regulation had failed. Non-government members opposed the bill entirely, characterising it as union-directed legislation that would impose unnecessary bureaucracy and costs on employers, arguing that better enforcement of existing national laws would be more effective at addressing rogue operators.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Trading (Allowable Hours) Amendment Bill 2017Recommended passagePASSED with amendment

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 37 - Trading (Allowable Hours) Amendment Bill 2017, government response2017-05-24

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 37, 55th Parliament - Trading (Allowable Hours) Amendment Bill 20172017-04-28

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill, which implements recommendations from the Mickel Review of trading hours in Queensland. The committee made three recommendations: to include the Cairns CBD as a defined tourist area, to correct shopping centre addresses, and to exclude motor vehicle and caravan retailers from the extended trading hours. All three recommendations were accepted by the government. Non-government members filed a Statement of Reservation and were unable to recommend the bill be passed.

Key findings
  • The bill established three location-based categories of core trading hours for non-exempt shops: South East Queensland, tourist areas, and other areas, with different opening hours for each
  • Small business groups raised concerns about the negative economic impact of extended trading hours for large retailers, particularly Coles and Woolworths, arguing the job creation claims were unsubstantiated
  • The motor vehicle dealer and caravan retail industries did not support extended trading hours and the committee recommended they be excluded
  • The bill included a five-year moratorium on further trading hours applications, with worker protections ensuring agreement to work extended hours would be voluntary
  • The bill proposed to dismiss current undecided QIRC trading hours applications, which drew criticism from the National Retail Association regarding a pending Gold Coast application
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Trading (Allowable Hours) Amendment Bill 2017 be amended to include the Cairns CBD in the defined tourist area.
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be amended, as per the Queensland Treasury's advice, to refer to an appropriate address for the Westfield Chermside and Westfield Garden City shopping centres.
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be amended to exclude the application of the changes to motor vehicle or caravan retailers.
Dissenting views: Non-government members were unable to recommend the bill be passed, citing concerns about the impact on smaller retail traders, the proposed extension of Sunday trading to car and caravan retailers, and potential net job losses in the retail sector. They argued the claimed 945 new jobs in the Mickel report were unsubstantiated and that the large retail duopoly's use of electronic and mechanical measures would further erode employment.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
State Penalties Enforcement Amendment Bill 2017Recommended passagePASSED with amendment

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 38-State Penalties Enforcement Amendment Bill 2017, government response2017-05-10

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 38, 55th Parliament - State Penalties Enforcement Amendment Bill 20172017-04-28

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the State Penalties Enforcement Amendment Bill 2017, which introduced work and development orders (WDOs) allowing people experiencing genuine hardship to satisfy SPER debts through unpaid work or courses. The committee recommended the bill be passed and also recommended adding a catch-all eligibility provision for WDOs. The government supported both recommendations, noting the eligibility criteria would be comprehensive enough without a legislative catch-all.

Key findings
  • The bill introduced work and development orders allowing people in hardship to satisfy SPER debts through unpaid work, courses, or treatment programs
  • The LGAQ and Logan City Council sought clarification on recovery of vehicle identification costs under new section 14A
  • Community Legal Centres argued WDOs should extend to restitution and compensation amounts, but Treasury advised this would disadvantage victims
  • The LGAQ raised concerns about how administering authorities would be notified when debts are finalised through WDOs without income being received
  • The committee found the bill's eligibility categories for WDOs needed a catch-all provision to cover exceptional circumstances
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the State Penalties Enforcement Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
  • The committee recommends that in proposed new section 32H, clause 24 be amended to include a catch-all provision for eligibility for the work and development orders.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 34, 55th Parliament - Farm Business Debt Mediation Bill 2016 and Rural and Regional Adjustment (Development Assistance) Amendment Bill 2016, government response2017-03-21

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 34, 55th Parliament - Farm Business Debt Mediation Bill 2016 and Rural and Regional Adjustment (Development Assistance) Amendment Bill 2016, interim government response2017-03-01

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 34, 55th Parliament - Farm Business Debt Mediation Bill 2016 and Rural and Regional Adjustment (Development Assistance) Amendment Bill 20162016-11-28

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined this Private Member's Bill concurrently with the government's Farm Business Debt Mediation Bill 2016. The committee recommended that the Rural and Regional Adjustment (Development Assistance) Amendment Bill 2016 not be passed, instead favouring the government's alternative bill which introduced a farm business debt mediation scheme. The committee made 22 recommendations in total, most relating to improvements to the government bill.

Key findings
  • The committee considered this Private Member's Bill alongside the government's Farm Business Debt Mediation Bill 2016, which addressed similar issues around farm debt
  • The committee recommended the Private Member's Bill not be passed, preferring the government's alternative approach
  • The government accepted or supported the majority of the committee's 22 recommendations for amendments to its own bill
  • Key issues examined included rural debt levels, legal support for farmers, mediation processes, and protections for farmers dealing with mortgagees
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Rural and Regional Adjustment (Development Assistance) Amendment Bill 2016 not be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Industrial Relations Bill 2016Did not recommend passagePASSED with amendment

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 32, 55th Parliament - Industrial Relations Bill 20162016-10-28

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the Industrial Relations Bill 2016, receiving 44 submissions and holding public hearings. The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on a motion to recommend passage, and the motion therefore failed. Government members supported the bill, while non-government members filed a statement of reservation recommending the bill be returned for further consultation.

Key findings
  • A majority of the 44 submissions received were largely supportive of the bill while suggesting minor amendments
  • The committee could not reach a majority to recommend passage, so the motion failed under section 91C(7) of the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001
  • The Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland opposed the proposal to give the QIRC exclusive jurisdiction over workplace anti-discrimination matters, citing concerns about creating two bodies of case law
  • The Local Government Association of Queensland raised concerns about the estimated $100 million cost impact of multi-award classifications on local governments
  • The committee recommended amendments to the Public Service Act regarding conversion of temporary employees to permanent positions
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be amended to amend section 149 of the Public Service Act 2008 to provide that the review of a temporary employee and a decision made under that section must be made in accordance with binding criteria set out in the directive, and that the default position is to approve the conversion where the qualifying conditions are met.
  • The committee recommends that the Public Service Act 2008 be amended to provide specific power to the QIRC to deal with matters pertaining to the employment relationship including temporary employment.
Dissenting views: Non-government members Mr Ray Stevens MP, Mr Lachlan Millar MP, and Mr Pat Weir MP filed a statement of reservation arguing the bill was flawed and should be returned to the department. They characterised the bill as promoting union power over worker choice, criticised the lack of consultation on the Easter Sunday public holiday, and raised concerns about the financial impact on businesses, including the estimated $53 million cost of the additional public holiday and $100 million cost to local governments.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2016Recommended passagePASSED

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 31, 55th Parliament - Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 20162016-10-25

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2016, which sought parliamentary approval for $390.126 million in supplementary appropriation for unforeseen expenditure incurred by eight departments in the 2015-16 financial year. The bulk of the unforeseen expenditure ($296.985 million) was for Queensland Treasury to pay down debt under the government's enhanced Debt Action Plan. The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting the Acting Auditor-General had issued an unmodified opinion on the Consolidated Fund Financial Report.

Key findings
  • The $390.126 million in unforeseen expenditure was a relatively low level of supplementary appropriation compared with the previous 19 years
  • The largest component ($296.985 million) was for Queensland Treasury debt repayment, facilitated by early dividend payments from government-owned corporations
  • Other significant unforeseen expenditure included $40.476 million for the Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services and $39.509 million for the Department of Energy and Water Supply
  • The Acting Auditor-General confirmed the Consolidated Fund Financial Report presented a true and fair view of transactions for 2015-16
  • Lapsed appropriation of $2.4 billion (just over 4% of total appropriation) was lower than in recent years and primarily reflected reprofiling of spending into future years
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2016 be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 21, 55th Parliament - North Stradbroke Island Protection and Sustainability andOther Acts Amendment Bill 2015 and North Stradbroke Island Protection and Sustainability (Renewal of Mining Leases) Amendment Bill 20152016-05-03

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined this Private Member's Bill alongside the Government's North Stradbroke Island Protection and Sustainability and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2015. The committee unanimously recommended that this Private Member's Bill not be passed, though government and non-government members disagreed on the reasons. The committee was also unable to agree on whether the companion Government Bill should be passed. The inquiry received extensive submissions and held public hearings on the economic, environmental, and Indigenous land rights impacts of phasing out sand mining on North Stradbroke Island.

Key findings
  • The committee unanimously agreed the Private Member's Bill should not be passed, though for differing reasons between government and non-government members
  • The committee could not reach agreement on whether the companion Government Bill should be passed
  • A Deloitte Access Economics report estimated direct economic losses of between $563 million and $880 million over 16 years from early mine closure
  • The Quandamooka peoples' native title rights and Indigenous Land Use Agreements were central considerations in the inquiry
  • Non-government members raised concerns about the lack of a Regulatory Impact Statement and the adequacy of the economic transition strategy
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the North Stradbroke Island Protection and Sustainability (Renewal of Mining Leases) Amendment Bill 2015 (the Private Member's Bill) not be passed.
Dissenting views: Non-government members filed a Statement of Reservation, arguing that all economic evidence pointed to a massive drop in economic activity and that the options in the Economic Transition Strategy could not replace the lost mining activity by the proposed mine closure date. They supported maintaining the existing 2035 end date under the current Act.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 16, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into the introduction of four year terms for the Queensland Parliament, including consideration of Constitution (Fixed Term Parliament) Amendment Bill 2015 and Constitution (Fixed Term Parliament) Referendum Bill 20152015-11-09

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee conducted an inquiry into the introduction of four-year terms for the Queensland Parliament, considering this bill alongside the companion Constitution (Fixed Term Parliament) Referendum Bill 2015. The committee's Report No. 16 was tabled on 9 November 2015. No report text is available for detailed analysis.

AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Queensland Productivity Commission Bill 2015Recommended passagePASSED with amendment

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 15, 55th Parliament - Queensland Productivity Commission Bill 20152015-11-02

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The committee found that stakeholders were generally supportive of establishing the Queensland Productivity Commission as an independent economic advisory body. Key issues examined included the time allowed for ministerial responses to Commission reports, the handling of competitive neutrality complaints, and enforcement of Commission recommendations. The committee also identified minor drafting errors and noted that the explanatory notes lacked sufficient detail.

Key findings
  • Stakeholders were generally supportive of establishing the Queensland Productivity Commission
  • The most significant concern was the six-month timeframe allowed for the Minister to respond to Commission reports, though the committee accepted this was a maximum
  • Stakeholders raised concerns about whether industry associations could make competitive neutrality complaints and the enforcement of Commission recommendations
  • The committee found that the explanatory notes provided minimal detail and would benefit from additional background information
  • The committee identified minor referencing errors in the bill's drafting
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Queensland Productivity Commission Bill 2015 be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 13, 55th Parliament - Appropriation (Parliament) Bill (No. 2) 20152015-10-20

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The bill sought supplementary appropriation of $2.934 million for unforeseen expenditure by the Legislative Assembly and Parliamentary Service in 2014-15, primarily related to one-off expenses from the 2015 state general election, the fire protection system at Parliament House, and financial system upgrades. No submissions were received and no fundamental legislative principle issues were identified.

Key findings
  • The unforeseen expenditure of $2.934 million was primarily driven by one-off costs from the 2015 state general election, including transitional allowances for departing members and electorate officer severance payments.
  • Additional expenditure related to the design of the fire protection system at Parliament House and upgrades to the financial system.
  • Savings from the reduction in the number of ministers and assistant ministers partially offset the election-related costs.
  • The committee found no fundamental legislative principle issues with the bill.
  • No public submissions were received during the inquiry.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Appropriation (Parliament) Bill (No. 2) 2015 be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2015Recommended passagePASSED

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 12, 55th Parliament - Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 20152015-10-20

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill over approximately five weeks, holding a public departmental briefing with Queensland Treasury. The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting it authorises the lowest amount of unforeseen expenditure ($9.11 million) over the past 18 years. The bill also makes a technical amendment to the Financial Accountability Act 2009 to allow departments to enter into finance leases with the private sector, since Queensland Treasury Corporation has exited the leasing business.

Key findings
  • The supplementary appropriation of $9.11 million was the lowest unforeseen expenditure in 18 years, attributed to improved scrutiny of agency spending
  • Over 60 per cent of unforeseen expenditure was incurred by the Public Safety Business Agency for police station and watch-house upgrades, with a further 28 per cent by the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Queensland Agricultural Training Colleges
  • The amendment to section 71 of the Financial Accountability Act removes the requirement that departments borrow only from Queensland Treasury Corporation, as QTC has exited the leasing business
  • The Treasurer's approval will continue to be required for all departmental borrowings, and traditional borrowings will continue through QTC except in exceptional circumstances
  • The committee found no fundamental legislative principle issues with the bill
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2015 be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 5, 55th Parliament - Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-10-13

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 5, 55th Parliament - Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-10-12

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 5, 55th Parliament - Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20152015-07-06

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving 32 submissions, holding two public departmental briefings and a public hearing. The committee could not reach agreement on whether to recommend the bill be passed. Government members supported passage while non-government members considered significant amendments would be required before they could support it. The committee made one recommendation regarding improving employer notification systems.

Key findings
  • The committee was split along party lines, with government members supporting the bill and non-government members opposing it without significant amendments
  • The bill sought to restore work health and safety provisions changed in 2012, including right of entry powers for WHS permit holders and powers for health and safety representatives to direct workers to cease unsafe work
  • Stakeholders were divided, with unions broadly supporting the bill and employer groups raising concerns about the changes to right of entry and cease work provisions
  • The committee received 32 submissions and heard from numerous stakeholders during a public hearing
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Department of Justice and Attorney-General work to improve ease of access and reporting systems for employers, including self-insured employers, and develop education and communication strategies to ensure employers are both aware of the requirements and the reasons for them.
Dissenting views: Non-government members considered that significant amendments would be required before they could support the bill. The committee could not reach agreement on key provisions including changes to right of entry powers and the power of health and safety representatives to direct cease work.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 6, 55th Parliament - Holidays and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-10-13

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 6, 55th Parliament - Holidays and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20152015-08-10

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee was unable to reach agreement on whether to recommend the bill be passed. The bill had two components: moving the Labour Day public holiday from October back to May and the Queen's Birthday from June to October, and implementing online applications for high-risk work licences. The committee agreed on the HRW licence amendments but split along party lines on the public holiday changes, with government members supporting the move and non-government members opposing it.

Key findings
  • The committee could not agree on whether to recommend passage due to the politically contentious public holiday changes, with government and non-government members holding opposing views
  • An extensive 2011 community consultation of 24,505 respondents found 85.4 per cent supported moving the Queen's Birthday holiday to the second half of the year
  • Non-government members raised concerns about the impact on rural and regional communities where events such as rodeos and picnic races are planned around the June long weekend
  • The Chamber of Commerce and Industry Queensland opposed the changes on the grounds of losing national consistency with other states' Queen's Birthday holiday in June
  • The committee agreed unanimously that the proposed amendments to high-risk work licence applications were sound and should be supported
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that, should the bill pass, the Minister work with community and other groups to alleviate any inconvenience caused by the movement of public holidays.
Dissenting views: Non-government (LNP) members opposed the public holiday changes, arguing that moving the Queen's Birthday from June would break national consistency with other states and harm rural and regional events planned around the June long weekend. They suggested the government's approach was ideologically motivated rather than reflecting the wants and needs of Queenslanders. Government (ALP) members countered that the changes were supported by overwhelming community consultation results and that Labour Day has been celebrated on the first Monday in May in Queensland since 1901, with deep cultural and historical significance.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 8, 55th Parliament - Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-09-16

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 11, 55th Parliament - 2015-16 Budget Estimates Appropriation Bill 20152015-09-11

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 10, 55th Parliament - 2015-16 Budget Estimates Appropriation (Parliament) Bill 20152015-09-11

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 8, 55th Parliament - Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20152015-09-08

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined this bill, which introduced 'deemed disease' workers' compensation provisions for firefighters diagnosed with certain cancers linked to their work. The committee was unable to reach agreement on whether to recommend the bill be passed. Government members accepted the bill should pass with amendments, while non-government members considered the bill should not pass unless significant amendments were made. The committee made six recommendations focusing on removing the 150 exposure incidents threshold for volunteer rural firefighters, establishing an independent panel to assess claims, and improving record-keeping.

Key findings
  • The committee could not identify a scientific basis for the 150 exposure incidents threshold for volunteer rural firefighters, noting it was derived from Tasmanian negotiations rather than evidence
  • Poor record-keeping by Queensland Fire and Emergency Services was identified as a significant barrier to the success of rebuttable presumptive legislation for volunteer firefighters
  • The committee found insufficient scientific research existed on the exposure of volunteer rural firefighters to toxins and carcinogens
  • Government members accepted the bill should pass with amendments, while non-government members considered significant amendments were needed before the bill should pass
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that amendments be made to allow for the inclusion of additional diseases that may be identified in the future.
  • The committee recommends that the requirement for rural volunteer firefighters to have attended 150 exposure incidents be omitted from the legislation.
  • The committee recommends that the legislation be amended to include the appointment of an independent committee or panel to consider exposures and assist in determining whether rebuttal of claims is warranted.
  • The committee recommends that the department seek and incorporate additional scientific studies of exposures by firefighters, including volunteer rural firefighters.
  • The committee recommends that as a matter of priority, Queensland Fire and Emergency Services implement a system of record keeping for firefighters that tracks individual firefighter's exposure to incidents.
  • Should the Minister not agree with recommendations 2 and 3, the committee recommends that the Minister reconsider the definition of an exposure included in proposed new section 36F.
Dissenting views: Non-government members considered that the bill should not be passed unless significant amendments were made, disagreeing with government members who accepted the bill should pass with amendments.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 9, 55th Parliament - Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation (Protecting Firefighters) Amendment Bill 20152015-09-08

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined this bill alongside the government's alternative Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015. The committee was unable to reach agreement on whether to recommend the bill be passed and made no formal recommendations. Non-government members supported passage with amendments, while government members raised grave concerns about drafting deficiencies and the scientific basis for volunteer firefighter coverage.

Key findings
  • The committee was split along party lines and could not agree on a recommendation for the bill
  • Both sides agreed that presumptive legislation should cover volunteer rural firefighters, but disagreed on the minimum qualifying threshold
  • Poor record-keeping by QFES regarding volunteer firefighter incident exposure was identified as a significant barrier to effective presumptive legislation
  • Government members raised concerns that the bill's drafting did not provide volunteer firefighters access to common law damages and had other technical deficiencies
  • Non-government members argued that all firefighters should be treated equally regardless of whether they are permanent, auxiliary, or volunteer
Dissenting views: Non-government members supported passage of the bill, maintaining that all firefighters should be treated equally and criticising the government for prioritising union preferences over volunteer firefighters. Government members countered that the bill was poorly drafted and would leave volunteer firefighters more vulnerable due to insufficient scientific evidence and gaps that could allow easy rebuttal of claims.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 4, 55th Parliament - Industrial Relations (Restoring Fairness) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-06-04

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 4, 55th Parliament - Industrial Relations (Restoring Fairness) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20152015-06-01

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined this Government bill, which sought to reverse changes made by the previous government to Queensland's industrial relations framework. The committee was unable to reach agreement on whether to recommend the bill be passed. Government members accepted the bill should pass with amendments, while non-government members considered the bill should not pass unless significant amendments were made. The committee made two specific recommendations relating to redundancy pay entitlements and dispute resolution clauses.

Key findings
  • The committee was unable to reach agreement on whether to recommend the bill be passed, with government and non-government members divided
  • Non-government members raised concerns about the urgency of the bill's passage and the adequacy of stakeholder consultation
  • The committee identified ambiguity regarding redundancy pay entitlements under the Queensland Employment Standard and recommended the Minister clarify this in the second reading speech
  • The committee considered that parties should have more flexibility in developing dispute resolution procedures and recommended the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission develop a standard clause
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that, should the Bill reach the second reading stage, the Minister provide clarification on the issue of redundancy pay entitlements in his second reading speech.
  • The committee recommends that, should the Bill reach the second reading stage, the Minister consider amending the Bill to enable the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission to develop a standard dispute resolution clause that could be available to parties and able to be amended by mutual agreement.
Dissenting views: Non-government members considered the bill should not be passed unless significant amendments were made, in contrast to government members who accepted the bill should pass with amendments.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 3 - Payroll Tax Rebate, Revenue and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-06-02

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 3a, 55th Parliament - Payroll Tax Rebate, Revenue and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015 [incorporating erratum tabled on 25 May 2015]2015-05-25

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 3, 55th Parliament - Payroll Tax Rebate, Revenue and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015 - Erratum2015-05-25

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 3, 55th Parliament - Payroll Tax Rebate, Revenue and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20152015-05-22

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined this omnibus revenue bill covering payroll tax rebates for apprentices and trainees, transfer duty concessions for mining farm-in agreements, and amendments to the Plumbing and Drainage Act. The committee made five recommendations, focusing on improving industry education about the farm-in concession, publishing public rulings for taxpayer certainty, and clarifying legislative provisions. The government accepted three recommendations and considered but declined to act on the other two, finding existing provisions adequate.

Key findings
  • Industry stakeholders sought greater clarity on how the transfer duty farm-in concession would operate in practice
  • The Queensland Law Society raised concerns about the drafting of section 84G(1) and the 30-day dispute notification period
  • The committee found that education and awareness campaigns were needed to explain the concession to the resources sector
  • The committee recommended investigating additional methods to increase employment opportunities for apprentices and trainees
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that Queensland Treasury undertake an education and awareness campaign providing detailed explanations about how the farm-in concession operates.
  • The committee recommends that Queensland Treasury prepare and publish a Public Ruling confirming the administrative approach to be taken, including clear examples of ascertainable versus milestone-based agreements, to ensure taxpayer certainty.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister consider the issues raised by the Queensland Law Society regarding whether amendments are warranted to section 84G(1) to ensure clear meaning.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister consider stakeholder concerns that the 30-day notice provisions do not contemplate dispute scenarios and give consideration to necessary actions.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister consider investigating additional methods of increasing employment opportunities for apprentices and trainees.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 2 - Parliament of Queensland and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-05-20

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 2, 55th Parliament - Parliament of Queensland and Other Acts Amendment Bill 20152015-05-08

Committee findings

The Finance and Administration Committee examined the Parliament of Queensland and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2015, which proposed reforms to the Committee of the Legislative Assembly (CLA) including adding cross bench representation and strengthening the Speaker's role. The committee did not make a clear recommendation for or against passage, instead framing its two recommendations as amendments that should be made 'should the Bill reach the second reading stage'. Both recommendations concerned how cross bench members would be represented on the CLA.

Key findings
  • The bill proposed restructuring the Committee of the Legislative Assembly to include a cross bench representative, increasing membership from seven to eight
  • The committee recommended that cross bench members select their own CLA representative, with the Leader of the House only intervening if they cannot reach agreement
  • The bill proposed enhancing the Speaker's role on the CLA, including responsibility for calling meetings, setting the agenda, and having both a deliberative and casting vote
  • The quorum for CLA meetings was proposed to increase from four to five members
  • The Assembly of the Reps and Tribunal (ART) welcomed the strengthening of the Speaker's autonomy in managing the Parliamentary Service
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that clause 24 be amended to reflect that cross bench members are to select their CLA representative in consultation with the Leader of the House, with the Leader having no vote but the power to decide if cross bench members cannot reach agreement by majority.
  • The committee recommends that the bill be amended to reflect the intention that the cross bench member would be an additional member of the CLA to make it an eight member committee.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Inquiries (69)

Other Reports (39)

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 51, 55th Parliament - Consideration of the recommendations of the strategic review of the Queensland Audit Office, government response

audit2018-04-13

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 51, 55th Parliament - Consideration of the recommendations of the strategic review of the Queensland Audit Office, interim government response

audit2018-01-02

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 52, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 9 and 22 August 2017

Subordinate Legislation2017-10-27

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 51, 55th Parliament - Consideration of the recommendations of the strategic review of the Queensland Audit Office

audit2017-10-13

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 50, 55th Parliament - Annual Report 2016-17

Other2017-10-13

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 49, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 14 June and 8 August 2017

Subordinate Legislation2017-10-13

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 47, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 10 May and 13 June 2017

Subordinate Legislation2017-10-09

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 45, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 1 March and 9 May 2017

Subordinate Legislation2017-08-11

Finance and Administration Committee : Reports No. 42 and 43, 55th Parliament - 2017-18 Budget Estimates - Additional Information

Other2017-08-04

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 40, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 15 and 28 February 2017

Subordinate Legislation2017-05-29

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 39, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 12 October 2016 and 14 February 2017

Subordinate Legislation2017-05-08

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 35, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into how to improve health and safety outcomes for combat sports contestants in high risk and amateur contests in Queensland, government response

Inquiry2017-03-17

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 36, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 30 August and 11 October 2016

Subordinate Legislation2017-02-03

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 35, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into how to improve health and safety outcomes for combat sports contestants in high risk and amateur contests in Queensland

Inquiry2016-12-16

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 33, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 15 June and 30 August 2016

Subordinate Legislation2016-11-03

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 30, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 11 May and 14 June 2016

Subordinate Legislation2016-10-10

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 25, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into the practices of the labour hire industry in Queensland, government response

Inquiry2016-09-30

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 29, 55th Parliament - Annual Report 2015-16

Other2016-09-09

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 28, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled on 10 May 2016

Subordinate Legislation2016-08-18

Finance and Administration Committee : Reports No. 26 and 27, 55th Parliament - 2016-17 Budget Estimates - Additional Information

Other2016-08-12

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 25, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into the practices of the labour hire industry in Queensland

Inquiry2016-06-30

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 24, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled on 19 April 2016

Subordinate Legislation2016-06-16

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 23, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into the legislative arrangements assuring the Queensland Auditor-General's independence

Inquiry2016-06-08

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 22, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 16 February 2016 and 15 March 2016

Subordinate Legislation2016-05-06

Finance and Administration Committee : Issues Paper - Inquiry into the practices of the labour hire industry in Queensland

Inquiry2016-03-18

Report to the House from the Finance and Administration Committee in relation to alleged intimidation of witnesses, in accordance with Standing Order 268 (1)

Other2016-03-16

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 19, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into the Report on the Strategic Review of the functions of the Integrity Commissioner, government response

Inquiry2016-03-11

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 20, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 15 September 2015 and 10 November 2015

Subordinate Legislation2016-02-17

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 19, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into the Report on the Strategic Review of the functions of the Integrity Commissioner

Inquiry2015-12-11

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 18, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 14 July 2015 and 15 September 2015

Subordinate Legislation2015-12-03

Finance and Administration Committee Report : No. 17, 55th Parliament - Annual Report 2014-15

Other2015-11-12

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 14, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 5 May 2015 and 14 July 2015

Subordinate Legislation2015-10-29

Finance and Administration Committee : Reports No. 10 and 11, 55th Parliament - 2015-16 Budget Estimates - Additional Information

Other2015-09-11

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 7, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 26 March 2015 and 5 May 2015

Subordinate Legislation2015-08-25

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 57 - Inquiry into Public Sector Contract Extensions, government response

Inquiry2015-06-09

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 1, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 29 August 2014 and 26 March 2015

Subordinate Legislation2015-05-06

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 53 - Annual Report 2013-2014, government response

Other2015-04-16

Finance and Administration Committee : Report No. 57 - Inquiry into Public Sector Contract Extensions, interim government response

Inquiry2015-03-09

Finance and Administration Committee: Report No. 53 - Annual Report 2013-2014, interim government response

Other2015-01-14