Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee
Portfolio CommitteeBills Reviewed (27)
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 71, 56th Parliament-Child Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20202020-08-28
Committee findings
The Community Support and Services Committee examined the Child Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2020 and recommended it be passed. The bill had previously been examined by the Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee in the 56th Parliament, which also recommended passage. A significant majority of submissions opposed the bill's proposed changes to the permanency hierarchy, particularly regarding the inclusion of adoption as the third preference for non-Indigenous children, with strong concerns raised about the impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. The committee acknowledged these concerns but concluded that existing safeguards in the Child Protection Act and Adoption Act were sufficient.
- A significant majority of submissions opposed the proposed amendments to the permanency hierarchy, particularly the explicit inclusion of adoption as the third preference for achieving permanency for children in care
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander stakeholders, legal bodies and child protection organisations raised serious concerns about the potential impact on Indigenous children, citing the legacy of the Stolen Generations and the risk of disconnection from family, culture and community
- The Queensland Law Society and Bar Association of Queensland argued that Permanent Care Orders offered a less restrictive alternative to adoption that maintains family connections, and should be preferred
- Submitters called for greater investment in prevention and early intervention services to reduce the number of children entering the child protection system, noting that 84 per cent of child protection funding was directed at child removal rather than family support
- The department confirmed that only 10 children had been adopted from the child protection system in the previous seven years, and that the bill clarified existing options rather than introducing new powers
- The committee recommends the Child Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2020 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 70, 56th Parliament-Crime and Corruption Amendment Bill 20202020-08-21
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 4, 56th Parliament - Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20182018-03-15
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018, which replicated the lapsed 2017 bill from the 55th Parliament. As the bill was identical to the earlier version, the committee relied on evidence already gathered by its predecessor and did not seek further submissions. The committee recommended the bill be passed, supporting the proposed changes to the definition of corrupt conduct and the expansion of the Crime and Corruption Commission's investigatory jurisdiction.
- The bill replicated the content of the lapsed Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 from the 55th Parliament.
- The committee relied on evidence gathered by the previous committee and did not seek further submissions or hold hearings.
- The committee supported the proposed changes to the definition of 'corrupt conduct', noting differing stakeholder views but accepting the Department of Justice and Attorney-General's responses to concerns.
- The committee supported the expansion of the Crime and Corruption Commission's investigatory jurisdiction, considering it would help reduce corrupt conduct in the public sector.
- The bill gave effect to recommendations from the Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee's Reports Nos. 97 and 99.
- The committee recommends the Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 65, 56th Parliament-Corrective Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20202020-05-29
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving 14 submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed. Key areas of concern raised by stakeholders included the regulation of gel blasters as replica firearms, the blanket ban on transferring certain prisoners to low custody facilities, increased penalties for assaulting corrective services officers, and restrictions on payments to prisoners. LNP members filed a statement of reservation objecting to the gel blaster regulation and early parole release provisions.
- The bill implemented recommendations from the Crime and Corruption Commission's Taskforce Flaxton report to address corruption risks in Queensland prisons, including alcohol and drug testing of staff and broader search powers
- Stakeholders including the Queensland Human Rights Commission and Sisters Inside raised concerns that the blanket ban on transferring prisoners convicted of any sexual offence to low custody facilities was disproportionate and could affect children and those convicted of minor offences
- Firearms industry stakeholders broadly supported the permanent firearms amnesty but raised concerns about the regulation of gel blasters as replica firearms, noting the impact on small businesses and rural communities
- The Queensland Human Rights Commission and Sisters Inside argued the increased penalties for assaulting corrective services officers may be premature given the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council was concurrently reviewing such penalties
- Sisters Inside and the Prisoners' Legal Service raised concerns about restrictions on payments to prisoners, noting the disproportionate impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander prisoners and women in prison
- The committee recommends the Corrective Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2020 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 64, 56th Parliament-Co-operatives National Law Bill 20202020-03-27
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Co-operatives National Law Bill 2020 over seven weeks, receiving three submissions, holding a public departmental briefing and a public hearing. All submitters supported the bill. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding that while it raised several fundamental legislative principle and human rights concerns -- particularly regarding inspector powers, self-incrimination protections, and the automatic adoption of future amendments from NSW -- these were justified in the circumstances.
- All three submitters -- the Coochin Creek Fruitgrowers' Co-operative, the Co-operative Federation of Queensland, and the Business Council of Co-operatives and Mutuals -- supported the bill
- The bill would make Queensland the last state to adopt nationally harmonised co-operatives legislation, removing a competitive disadvantage for Queensland co-operatives trading across borders
- Key reforms include simplified financial reporting for small co-operatives (around 90 per cent of Queensland's 165 co-operatives), new fundraising provisions through co-operative capital units, modernised directors' duties, and automatic mutual recognition across jurisdictions
- The committee identified several breaches of fundamental legislative principles, including inspector powers to enter premises without a warrant, abrogation of the privilege against self-incrimination, and reversal of the onus of proof, but found all were justified
- Stakeholders raised that the threshold definition of 'small co-operative' was lower than for small proprietary companies, and the department agreed to raise this at the national level through the Co-operatives National Law Working Party
- The committee recommends the Co-operatives National Law Bill 2020 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 62, 56th Parliament-Electoral (Voter's Choice) Amendment Bill 20192020-03-16
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over five months, receiving nine submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, despite acknowledging arguments on both sides of the optional preferential voting debate. LNP members dissented, filing a Statement of Reservation supporting the bill's intent to restore optional preferential voting as recommended by the post-Fitzgerald Electoral and Administrative Review Commission.
- The bill sought to reintroduce optional preferential voting (OPV) for Queensland state elections, replacing the compulsory preferential voting (CPV) system restored in 2016.
- Supporters argued OPV gives voters greater choice and reduces informal voting rates, noting informality more than doubled from 2.11% to 4.34% after CPV was reintroduced at the 2017 election.
- Opponents raised concerns that OPV can devolve into a de facto first-past-the-post system, particularly when parties run 'Just vote 1' campaigns, potentially allowing candidates to win with less than half the vote.
- Stakeholders were divided on whether exhausted votes under OPV represent a valid expression of voter preference or an undemocratic loss of representation.
- Several submitters argued the bill's scope was too narrow and that broader electoral reform, including proportional representation, was needed to address the disconnect between vote share and parliamentary seats.
- The committee recommends that the Electoral (Voter's Choice) Amendment Bill 2019 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 60, 56th Parliament, February 2020-Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192020-02-21
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this omnibus bill, which proposes amendments to 33 Acts and four Regulations across areas including coronial services, the Criminal Code, court administration, and succession law. The committee received submissions from six stakeholders, held a public departmental briefing and a public hearing, and recommended the bill be passed. While the committee found the bill's objectives were sound and most amendments were justified, it noted several fundamental legislative principle issues including retrospective operation, abrogation of the privilege against self-incrimination in coronial inquests, and limitations on the right to trial by jury.
- The bill addresses issues identified by the State Coroner and the Queensland Auditor-General's Coronial Services Report, allowing all inquests to come under the modern Coroners Act 2003 regardless of when the death occurred
- Increasing the 'prescribed value' for summary disposition of indictable property offences from $30,000 to $80,000 drew concern from the Bar Association of Queensland and the Queensland Law Society, who warned it would impose a significantly greater burden on magistrates
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns about the bill's abrogation of the privilege against self-incrimination in reopened coronial inquests, calling it a departure from cornerstone principles of the justice system
- Broadening the definition of 'disorderly activity' under the Peace and Good Behaviour Act drew concern from the Queensland Law Society, which warned the broadly drawn provisions could be applied to political protest activity
- The committee was satisfied that breaches of fundamental legislative principles, including retrospective operation and limitations on jury trials, were sufficiently justified in the circumstances
- The committee recommends the Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 59, 56th Parliament, February 2020-Criminal Code (Child Sexual Offences Reform) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192020-02-07
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over approximately two months, receiving 26 submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed. The bill implements key recommendations from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council's report on child exploitation material, and creates new offences for child abuse objects (child sex dolls). Significant debate centred on mandatory reporting obligations for all adults, the application of failure-to-report and failure-to-protect offences to information gained during religious confession, and the retrospective application of certain sentencing reforms.
- Submitters broadly supported the bill's objectives of implementing Royal Commission recommendations, though many raised concerns about unintended consequences of the mandatory reporting regime for vulnerable groups including domestic violence victims and people with disability
- The application of failure-to-report obligations to religious confession was contentious, with Catholic Church representatives opposing it on grounds of religious freedom, while child protection organisations, the Queensland Human Rights Commission, and other stakeholders supported it as a justified limitation
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns about the breadth of the mandatory reporting obligation for all adults, its interaction with legal professional privilege, and the retrospective application of contemporary sentencing standards to historical offences
- The committee found all fundamental legislative principle issues were sufficiently justified, including retrospective operation, reversal of onus of proof, restrictions on jury directions, and limitations on religious freedom
- The pilot intermediary scheme for vulnerable witnesses in child sexual abuse proceedings was supported by all submitters who commented on it, with many suggesting it be expanded to additional classes of vulnerable witnesses
- The committee recommends that the Criminal Code (Child Sexual Offences Reform) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 55, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192019-11-04
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over seven weeks, receiving ten submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed. The Queensland Law Society raised significant concerns about the breadth of expanded electronic device access powers, arguing they could allow police unfettered access to digital information of people not suspected of any offence. Sex worker organisations strongly opposed proposed amendments to the Prostitution Act, and the Minister subsequently withdrew those provisions, referring sex industry regulation to the Queensland Law Reform Commission instead.
- The bill clarifies police powers to access information on or through electronic devices, replacing the ambiguous term 'stored information' with 'device information' to cover cloud, email and social media data.
- The Queensland Law Society strongly opposed the electronic device access amendments, arguing they grant extraordinarily broad powers with no requirement that police demonstrate reasonable grounds to access a specific device or account.
- The Queensland Police Service maintained the amendments do not expand existing powers but merely clarify terminology to resolve ambiguity identified in three sets of legal advice.
- Proposed amendments to the Prostitution Act were withdrawn after sex worker organisations raised concerns about expanded police and PLA powers of entry, the removal of anti-corruption protections, and risks to sex workers' privacy and safety.
- The committee identified fundamental legislative principle concerns regarding self-incrimination, search powers in domestic violence situations, and delegation of controlled operation approvals, but found all were justified by law enforcement and public safety considerations.
- The committee recommends that the Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 54, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Criminal Code (Trespass Offences) Amendment Bill 20192019-11-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill over six months, receiving 132 submissions and holding public hearings in Brisbane and Warwick. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, finding that the proposed penalties were excessive and disproportionate compared to existing offences, the bill's drafting was ambiguous in key areas, and existing Queensland laws already adequately addressed the conduct targeted by the bill. LNP members filed a statement of reservation dissenting from the majority position.
- The bill proposed three new Criminal Code offences (aggravated trespass, serious criminal trespass, organised trespass) with penalties up to 10 years imprisonment and $400,350 in fines, which the committee found disproportionate to existing trespass penalties of up to one year imprisonment
- The Queensland Law Society, Environmental Defenders Office, and Animal Justice Party argued that existing laws under the Summary Offences Act, Criminal Code, Transport Infrastructure Act, and Biosecurity Regulation already covered the conduct targeted by the bill
- The committee identified significant drafting issues, including that the serious criminal trespass offence (s 423) would capture persons lawfully on premises, not just trespassers, contrary to the bill's stated intent
- Business and farming groups including the QRC, QFF, AgForce, and Australian Pork supported the bill, citing biosecurity risks, economic losses, and the inadequacy of existing fines as deterrents
- Many submitters raised concerns that the bill would have a chilling effect on the right to protest and would deter whistleblowers from exposing animal cruelty or environmental harm
- The committee recommends the Criminal Code (Trespass Offences) Amendment Bill 2019 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 53, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Weapons and Other Legislation (Firearms Offences) Amendment Bill 20192019-11-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this Private Member's Bill introduced by Trevor Watts MP (LNP), which proposed firearm prohibition orders, new firearms offences, and increased penalties. The committee received nine submissions and held public hearings. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, citing a lack of stakeholder consultation, concerns about the breadth of police powers to impose firearm prohibition orders without judicial oversight, overlap with existing offences, and insufficient justification for significantly increased penalties. LNP members filed a Statement of Reservation supporting the bill.
- Multiple stakeholders including the Firearms Dealers Association, Shooters Union, and Queensland Women's Legal Service confirmed they were not consulted before the bill was introduced
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns that firearm prohibition orders should be imposed by a judicial officer rather than the Police Commissioner, to ensure proper oversight of powers that significantly affect individuals' rights
- Stakeholders including women's advocacy groups and the Public Health Association supported the intent of firearm prohibition orders to protect domestic violence victims and align Queensland with other states
- The Queensland Law Society argued that many proposed new offences were unnecessary as existing laws already addressed the relevant conduct, and that proposed penalties were disproportionate
- The committee identified multiple fundamental legislative principle concerns including impacts on rights and liberties, reversal of onus of proof, and compulsory acquisition of property without compensation
- The committee recommends that the Weapons and Other Legislation (Firearms Offences) Amendment Bill 2019 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 52, 56th Parliament, October 2019-Summary Offences and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192019-10-21
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill under a truncated timeframe after the government brought the reporting date forward from 4 November to 21 October 2019, citing ongoing protest activity. The committee received over 200 submissions, the vast majority opposing the bill, and held a public hearing on 11 October 2019. Despite substantial concerns raised about the bill's impact on the right to peaceful assembly and the adequacy of existing laws, the committee recommended the bill be passed. Deputy Chair James Lister MP filed a Statement of Reservation expressing concern that the bill's scope was too narrow and would have limited impact on protest activity.
- The majority of the 212 submissions opposed the bill, with key concerns being that it unduly restricted the right to peaceful assembly and gave police excessive search and seizure powers
- Multiple stakeholders, including the Queensland Law Society, Human Rights Law Centre, and Caxton Legal Centre, questioned whether existing laws were already sufficient to address the stated safety concerns
- The Queensland Human Rights Commissioner noted that the truncated committee process did not allow for careful analysis of whether the proposed restrictions on human rights were demonstrably justified
- The committee identified potential fundamental legislative principle issues regarding undue restriction of ordinary activities, proportionality of penalties, and the conferral of warrantless search powers on police
- Industry stakeholders such as Aurizon and the Queensland Resources Council supported the bill but suggested the definitions of dangerous attachment devices were too prescriptive and the penalties too minor
- The committee recommends the Summary Offences and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 51, 56th Parliament, October 2019-Community Based Sentences (Interstate Transfer) Bill 20192019-10-08
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over approximately six weeks, receiving four submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding the national scheme for interstate transfer of community based sentences to be sound. Stakeholders raised concerns about decision-making timeframes, the discretionary nature of transfer decisions, and the lack of a merits review process, but the committee was broadly satisfied with the department's responses. No dissenting views were filed.
- The bill establishes Queensland's participation in a national scheme for the formal transfer of community based sentences between Australian jurisdictions, with all states except Queensland and the Northern Territory having already implemented the model legislation.
- Stakeholders including Sisters Inside and the Queensland Law Society raised concerns about the absence of a statutory timeframe for deciding transfer requests and the lack of written reasons for refusal decisions.
- The committee noted that while judicial review is available under the Judicial Review Act 1991, there is no informal or merits review of a decision to decline registration of an interstate sentence.
- The committee identified potential fundamental legislative principle issues regarding privacy of offender information, administrative power, and natural justice, but was satisfied these were justified in the circumstances.
- Queensland Corrective Services advised there would be no significant increase in offender transfers under the scheme, with approximately 87 interstate offenders currently managed informally in Queensland and 147 Queensland offenders managed interstate.
- The committee recommends the Community Based Sentences (Interstate Transfer) Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 43, 56th Parliament, August 2019-Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192019-08-09
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 over two months, receiving 28 submissions and holding a public hearing with 12 stakeholder organisations. The committee recommended the bill be passed. While stakeholders broadly supported the bill's reforms to bail decision-making, information sharing, and protections for children in the justice system, several raised concerns about the child homicide sentencing provision and the need for adequate resourcing to implement the changes. LNP members filed a Statement of Reservation calling for a 72-hour cap on children's detention in watch houses.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the reformed bail decision-making framework, including the explicit presumption in favour of release and child-specific factors, noting that 87 per cent of young people in Queensland detention were unsentenced on any given day
- Several key stakeholders including the Queensland Law Society, Sisters Inside, and PeakCare opposed the child homicide aggravating factor provision, arguing the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council's recommendation was not intended to apply to children as defendants
- Privacy concerns were raised about the new information sharing framework, though the committee found sufficient safeguards existed including consent requirements, limited purposes, and penalties for misuse
- Stakeholders emphasised that legislative changes to bail would be ineffective without investment in accommodation, support services, and training for police and judicial staff
- The committee found the bill had sufficient regard to fundamental legislative principles, noting justifiable limitations on privacy rights in the interests of vulnerable children
- The committee recommends the Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 37, 56th Parliament, April 2019-Civil Liability (Institutional Child Abuse) Amendment Bill 20182019-04-30
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill, which sought to implement recommendations 89 to 94 of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, raising concerns about the breadth of key definitions, the retrospective application of the proposed duty of institutions, and fundamental legislative principle issues including that an individual could be nominated as a defendant without their consent. A parallel government bill (Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018) was addressing several of the same Royal Commission recommendations at the time.
- The majority of stakeholders supported the bill's objectives, including survivor advocacy groups such as Bravehearts, knowmore, and the Australian Lawyers Alliance, who emphasised the importance of extending civil liability beyond sexual abuse to include serious physical and connected abuse.
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns that the definitions of 'institution', 'official', and 'related entity' were too broad and could capture unintended parties such as facility owners with no direct relationship to the abuse.
- The committee found the nominated defendant provisions could allow an individual to be named as defendant without their consent and held responsible for liability, which it considered an undue impact on individual rights.
- The Queensland Law Society opposed the retrospective application of the proposed duty of institutions, arguing it created an unfair hurdle for institutions defending claims about past events.
- The committee noted that the government had introduced its own bill (the Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018) addressing overlapping Royal Commission recommendations 91 to 94.
- The committee recommends the Civil Liability (Institutional Child Abuse) Amendment Bill 2018 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 36, 56th Parliament, April 2019-Criminal Code and Other Legislation (Mason Jett Lee) Amendment Bill 20192019-04-16
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill introduced by David Janetzki MP, which proposed mandatory minimum non-parole periods for the murder of a child (25 years) and a new offence of child homicide (15 years). The committee received 14 submissions and held public hearings, with the overwhelming weight of stakeholder evidence opposing the mandatory sentencing provisions. The committee recommended the bill not be passed.
- The Queensland Law Society, Bar Association of Queensland, Crime and Corruption Commission, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service, PeakCare, PACT, and others all opposed the mandatory sentencing provisions in the bill.
- Stakeholders argued that mandatory sentencing removes judicial discretion, can produce unjust outcomes in individual cases, and has not been shown to deter offending in other jurisdictions.
- The Bar Association highlighted that the broad scope of the child homicide offence could capture cases involving negligence rather than deliberate violence, citing a case where a parent who left a child unattended in a bath would have faced a 15-year mandatory minimum.
- Several stakeholders raised concerns about the bill's potential disproportionate impact on vulnerable groups including Indigenous people, those with mental illness, and young offenders.
- The bill's explanatory notes claimed general consistency with fundamental legislative principles but did not detail or justify the inconsistencies arising from the removal of judicial discretion.
- The committee recommends the Criminal Code and Other Legislation (Mason Jett Lee) Amendment Bill 2019 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 35, 56th Parliament, April 2019-Criminal Code and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192019-04-16
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving 14 submissions and holding a public hearing with seven stakeholder groups. The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting it implements the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council's recommendation on child homicide sentencing. Stakeholders were divided, with child protection organisations supporting the reforms while the Bar Association of Queensland, Queensland Law Society, and others raised serious concerns about expanding the definition of murder to include reckless indifference and the interaction with mandatory life sentencing. LNP committee members filed a statement of reservation, supporting the bill only if passed in conjunction with a related Private Member's Bill.
- The bill implements Recommendation 1 of the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council's review into sentencing for criminal offences arising from the death of a child
- Child protection groups broadly supported the reforms, while the Bar Association of Queensland, Queensland Law Society, and Queensland Council for Civil Liberties raised concerns about expanding the murder definition and mandatory sentencing consequences
- The Bar Association argued that expanding murder to include reckless indifference would capture lower-culpability conduct and impose disproportionate mandatory life sentences
- The Queensland Law Society and Women's Legal Service Queensland recommended the expanded murder definition be referred to the Queensland Law Reform Commission for further review
- The committee found the bill's amendments were justified with regard to fundamental legislative principles, including rights and liberties of individuals
- The committee recommends the Criminal Code and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 32, 56th Parliament, March 2019-Protecting Queenslanders from Violent and Child Sex Offenders Amendment Bill 20182019-03-19
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill over five months, receiving three submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, citing significant concerns about proportionality, the removal of judicial oversight in favour of executive review by the Governor in Council, and potential constitutional invalidity. LNP members filed a statement of reservation disagreeing with the committee's recommendation.
- All three submitters (Bar Association of Queensland, Queensland Advocacy Incorporated, and Queensland Law Society) raised concerns about the bill's scope and impact on individual rights
- The bill's definition of 'repeat offender' was considered overly broad, potentially capturing individuals convicted of two offences in the same proceeding
- The proposed indeterminate supervision orders, including lifetime GPS monitoring, were found to raise serious fundamental legislative principle issues around proportionality and personal liberty
- The bill would transfer review of supervision orders from the courts to the Governor in Council, removing the prisoner's right to present their case or be legally represented in the review process
- The Queensland Law Society raised significant concerns about the constitutional validity of the bill, noting it may go beyond the scope upheld by the High Court in Pollentine v Bleijie
- The committee recommends the Protecting Queenslanders from Violent and Child Sex Offenders Amendment Bill 2018 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 31, 56th Parliament, March 2019-Anti-Discrimination (Right to Use Gender-Specific Language) Amendment Bill 20182019-03-19
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over five months, receiving seven submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, finding it inconsistent with the objectives of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 and with fundamental legislative principles. The committee concluded the bill would likely negatively impact transgender, gender diverse and intersex community members.
- The Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland advised that no one had approached it with the concerns the bill purported to address and considered the proposed amendments unnecessary or misconceived.
- Several stakeholders, including Caxton Legal Centre and the Australian Association of Social Workers, raised concerns the bill would increase discrimination against transgender, gender diverse and intersex people.
- The committee found the bill's proposed definition of indirect discrimination could prevent employers from introducing inclusive language policies, breaching fundamental legislative principles regarding rights and liberties of individuals.
- The proposal to extend anti-discrimination protections to businesses and organisations was found to be inconsistent with the framework of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991, which protects individuals rather than entities.
- The bill omitted the reasonableness and proportionality tests from its definition of indirect discrimination, making the prohibition too broad according to the Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland.
- The committee recommends the Anti-Discrimination (Right to Use Gender-Specific Language) Amendment Bill 2018 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 30, 56th Parliament, March 2019-Justice Legislation (Links to Terrorist Activity) Amendment Bill 20182019-03-07
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over approximately four months, receiving five submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed, acknowledging stakeholder concerns about erosion of the presumption of innocence and fettering of judicial discretion, but concluding that the unique risk posed by persons with terrorism links justified the departure from usual legal protections. Significant concerns were raised about the bill's application to children, its retrospective operation, and its potential to disincentivise rehabilitation.
- Stakeholders including the Bar Association of Queensland, the Queensland Law Society, and University of Queensland academics raised serious concerns about the erosion of the presumption of innocence and the fettering of judicial discretion in bail and parole decisions
- The Youth Advocacy Centre and other submitters warned that applying the presumption against bail and parole to children as young as 10 years of age conflicted with the Youth Justice Principles, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the recognition that children are less culpable than adults
- Multiple submitters argued that a presumption against parole would disincentivise prisoners from engaging in rehabilitation and deradicalisation programs, potentially resulting in less-rehabilitated individuals being released at the end of their sentences
- The committee considered several provisions raised potentially significant issues of fundamental legislative principle, including retrospective application of bail and parole restrictions and delegation of legislative power to expand the list of terrorism offences by regulation
- The committee accepted that Queensland's participation in the COAG commitment and the unique risk posed by persons with terrorism antecedents or associations justified the special measures despite the departure from fundamental legislative principles
- The committee recommends that the Justice Legislation (Links to Terrorist Activity) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 29, 56th Parliament, February 2019-Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20182019-02-28
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 over several months, receiving submissions and holding public hearings. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding that the reforms would improve fair access and outcomes for survivors of institutional child sexual abuse seeking civil damages. Opposition members filed a statement of reservation raising concerns about the absence of retrospectivity, the limitation of the bill to sexual abuse only, and the lack of vicarious liability provisions.
- The bill implements recommendations 91 to 94 of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse's Redress and Civil Litigation Report, introducing a duty of care on institutions with a reverse onus of proof.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the bill's intent but raised concerns about its prospective-only application, meaning past cases of abuse would not be covered by the new provisions.
- The Australian Lawyers Alliance and other submitters argued the bill should also introduce vicarious liability consistent with Royal Commission recommendations 89 and 90, rather than relying solely on a duty of care model.
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns that the definition of 'associated trust' in the bill was broader than the Royal Commission intended, potentially capturing trusts not connected to institutional abuse.
- The committee examined the reversal of the onus of proof in civil matters and found it was justified, noting institutions are best placed to demonstrate they took all reasonable steps to prevent abuse.
- The committee recommends the Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 26, 56th Parliament-Human Rights Bill 20182019-02-04
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Human Rights Bill 2018 over approximately three months, receiving 149 written submissions and 135 form submissions, holding a public briefing with the Department of Justice and Attorney-General, and conducting a public hearing with stakeholders. The committee recommended that the Bill be passed, noting broad support from the majority of submitters for the proposed dialogue model of human rights protection. Opposition members filed a statement of reservation expressing concerns about whether the Bill added substantive legal protection beyond existing law, the potential for frivolous complaints, and the impact of declarations of incompatibility on the separation of powers.
- The majority of stakeholders expressed support for the Bill and its dialogue model, which gives the executive, legislature, and courts each a role in protecting human rights while maintaining parliamentary sovereignty.
- The Bill draws primarily on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, with additional rights to education and health services from the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, modelled on Victoria's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities.
- Numerous submitters sought to expand the scope of protected rights beyond those in the Bill, including rights to housing, an adequate standard of living, environmental rights, and workplace rights, but the government considered a graduated approach appropriate.
- Significant debate arose over the obligations on public entities, with the Bill adopting a 'piggyback' cause of action model that does not create a standalone right to sue but allows human rights claims to be added to existing legal proceedings.
- The committee noted concerns from some submitters about the limitation clause (clause 13), the override declaration provision, and the potential impact of declarations of incompatibility on the traditional separation of powers.
- The committee recommends that the Human Rights Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 20, 56th Parliament - Criminal Code (Non-Consensual Sharing of Intimate Images) Amendment Bill 20182018-10-05
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over six weeks, receiving 18 submissions and holding a public hearing with legal, women's advocacy, and child protection organisations. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed, finding the new offences were necessary to close gaps in existing criminal laws that did not adequately cover all forms of non-consensual sharing of intimate images. The committee also called for a review of the new laws three years after commencement to ensure they remain effective as technology changes.
- Existing Queensland criminal offences did not adequately cover all forms of non-consensual sharing of intimate images, particularly where images were not made in private settings or where the requisite harm could not be proven.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the bill but raised concerns about the definition of consent in coercive relationships, the scope of the definition of intimate image, and the exclusion of images with religious or cultural significance.
- The Bar Association of Queensland, Queensland Law Society, and Queensland Council for Civil Liberties raised concerns that existing child exploitation material laws could criminalise young people engaged in consensual peer-to-peer sexting, and called for review of those laws.
- Several stakeholders emphasised the need for police training, community education, and a multi-faceted response alongside the new criminal offences to effectively address image-based abuse.
- The committee found the reversal of onus of proof for the defence provisions and the partially retrospective operation of rectification orders were justified in the circumstances.
- The committee recommends the Criminal Code (Non-consensual Sharing of Intimate Images) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 19, 56th Parliament - Liquor (Rural Hotels Concession) Amendment Bill 20182018-09-21
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee recommended the Liquor (Rural Hotels Concession) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed. The bill, a Private Member's Bill introduced by Robbie Katter MP, proposed reducing liquor licence fees by 90 per cent for approximately 110 commercial hotels in very remote Queensland. The committee relied on the extensive inquiry conducted by the previous parliament's committee into the substantially identical 2017 Bill, which included 19 submissions, roundtable discussions in seven remote towns, and public hearings. No dissenting views were recorded.
- Hotels in very remote Queensland serve as essential community hubs, providing meeting places, tourist information, accommodation, postal services and emergency contacts far beyond their role as licensed venues.
- The majority of stakeholders supported the bill, arguing it was unreasonable for very remote hotels with tiny populations to pay the same $3,630 annual licence fee as hotels in Brisbane.
- The Queensland Coalition for Action on Alcohol opposed the bill on public health grounds, noting that per-capita alcohol consumption is higher in remote areas, but the committee was not persuaded.
- Clubs Queensland raised concerns about competitive fairness for the 32 clubs in very remote areas, but the committee noted the fee difference would only be approximately $300 and found no evidence of clubs with 2,000 or more members in very remote areas.
- The committee found no issues with fundamental legislative principles and considered the use of the Australian Bureau of Statistics 'very remote Australia' classification to be a satisfactory criterion.
- The committee recommends the Liquor (Rural Hotels Concession) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 17, 56th Parliament - Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20182018-08-09
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this wide-ranging police powers bill over approximately two months, receiving five submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing with the Queensland Police Service, Queensland Corrective Services, and key legal stakeholders. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding that the proposed expansions of police powers — including new search powers for high-risk missing persons, a lowered crime scene threshold, and compelled access to locked electronic storage devices — were justified on balance, noting the safeguards built into the bill such as judicial oversight, body-worn camera recording requirements, and a mandatory five-year review by the Crime and Corruption Commission. The Bar Association of Queensland and Queensland Law Society raised concerns about civil liberties implications of several provisions, but the committee concluded the potential breaches of fundamental legislative principles were outweighed by community safety benefits.
- The bill's high-risk missing person search powers were an Australian first, with stakeholders divided between those supporting the new tools for police and those concerned about impacts on the rights of property owners and occupiers
- The Queensland Law Society and Bar Association of Queensland raised significant civil liberties concerns about multiple provisions including the lowered crime scene threshold, compelled disclosure of storage device passwords, and expanded breach-of-the-peace search powers
- The Crime and Corruption Commission, Protect All Children Today, and Queensland Council of Unions broadly supported the bill's objectives, particularly the enhanced protections for children and missing persons
- The committee found that the bill's safeguards — including judicial oversight, commissioned officer approval, electronic recording of powers used, and a mandatory CCC review after five years — adequately balanced expanded police powers against individual rights
- The Bar Association opposed extending the parole reapplication period for life-sentenced prisoners from six to twelve months, warning it could lead to a loss of hope and reduced rehabilitation efforts
- The committee recommends the Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 8, 56th Parliament - Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Amendment Bill 20182018-04-23
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over six weeks, receiving 10 submissions and holding a public hearing. All submitters supported the bill. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed, recognising that removing the requirement for married transgender people to divorce before updating their registered sex would have a significant positive impact for members of the LGBTIQ community.
- All 10 submitters unanimously supported the bill, including the Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland, the Human Rights Law Centre, and the LGBTI Legal Service.
- The bill was consequential to Commonwealth marriage equality legislation, which from 9 December 2018 would remove legal protections for state registry officers who refused to note sex reassignment for married persons.
- Under the existing law, married transgender people were forced to choose between legal recognition of their gender and legal recognition of their marriage, with divorce effectively requiring perjury if the relationship was harmonious.
- Several stakeholders described the amendment as the minimum necessary reform and called for broader changes to the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act, which the Government was already reviewing separately.
- The committee found no issues with fundamental legislative principles and considered the explanatory notes sufficient.
- The committee recommends the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 7, 56th Parliament - Guardianship and Administration and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20182018-03-23
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Guardianship and Administration and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018, which was substantially the same as a 2017 bill that lapsed when Parliament was dissolved. The committee relied on evidence gathered by the previous Parliament's committee, including 18 submissions and a public hearing with over a dozen witnesses. The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting broad stakeholder support for reforms to modernise Queensland's guardianship laws and strengthen safeguards for adults with impaired capacity. A Statement of Reservation was filed but its content was not available in the extracted report text.
- The bill implements recommendations from the Queensland Law Reform Commission's 2010 review of guardianship laws and aligns Queensland's guardianship legislation with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the reforms but raised concerns about the presumption of capacity provisions, with advocacy groups arguing the blanket reversal of the presumption after a QCAT order does not adequately recognise that capacity can fluctuate over time.
- The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service raised concerns that restrictions on who may be an eligible attorney or statutory health attorney could be limiting for remote Indigenous communities with small populations.
- Several stakeholders including the Queensland Law Society and Queensland Advocacy Incorporated sought stronger safeguards around conflict transactions, interim orders, and legal representation for adults with impaired capacity before QCAT.
- The committee examined fundamental legislative principle issues around delegation of administrative power by the Public Trustee and Public Guardian, and immunity from proceedings for whistleblowers reporting guardianship concerns.
- The committee recommends that the Guardianship and Administration and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 1, 56th Parliament - Police and Other Legislation (Identity and Biometric Capability) Amendment Bill 2018, government response2018-03-06
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 1, 56th Parliament - Police and Other Legislation (Identity and Biometric Capability) Amendment Bill 20182018-03-02
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over a short timeframe, holding a public hearing in Brisbane on 26 February 2018 with witnesses including the Privacy Commissioner. The committee recommended the bill be passed, while also recommending a review of the legislation two years after commencement to evaluate how the identity matching services were being used. The bill also included unrelated amendments to extend liquor trading hours on the Gold Coast during the 2018 Commonwealth Games.
- Identity crime costs Australia an estimated $2.2 billion annually and is a key enabler of serious and organised crime, including drug trafficking, money laundering, and terrorism.
- The bill proposed Queensland's participation in the Australia-wide Identity Matching Services, using biometric facial recognition technology to detect identity fraud that name-based checking cannot.
- All Australian jurisdictions had recognised the need for a comprehensive legislative response and agreed to utilise biometric facial recognition as the cornerstone for identity crime prevention.
- The Privacy Commissioner raised considerations about privacy safeguards during the committee's public hearing.
- The bill also included amendments to the Liquor Act 1992 to extend trading hours in the Broadbeach and Surfers Paradise safe night precincts during the 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games.
- The committee recommends the Police and Other Legislation (Identity and Biometric Capability) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
- The committee recommends that a review of the changes made by this legislation be conducted two years after its commencement to evaluate the frequency, purpose and type of identity matching services used, the users, the error rates and any incidences of service expansion.
Other Reports (52)
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 79, 56th Parliament-Consideration of Auditor-General Report 21: 2018-19-Delivering forensic services
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 78, 56th Parliament-Annual Report 2019-20
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 77, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 26 June 2020 and 14 July 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 76, 56th Parliament-Oversight of the Family Responsibilities Commission
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 75, 56th Parliament-Oversight of the Queensland Family and Child Commission
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 74, 56th Parliament-Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 73, 56th Parliament-Oversight of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 72, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 20 May 2020 and 25 June 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 69, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 23 April 2020 and 19 May 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 68, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 18 March 2020 and 22 April 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 67, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 5 February 2020 and 17 March 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 66, 56th Parliament-Inquiry into the Electoral Commission of Queensland's online publication of the preliminary and formal counts of the votes cast in the 2020 quadrennial local government election and the Bundamba and Currumbin state by-elections held on 28 March 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 63, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 27 November 2019 and 4 February 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 61, 56th Parliament, March 2020-Exempt subordinate legislation tabled 21 October 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 58, 56th Parliament, December 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 October 2019 and 26 November 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 57, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 21 August 2019 and 15 October 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 56, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Annual Report 2018-19
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 50, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Examination of Queensland Audit Office Report 6: 2018-19-Delivering coronial services
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 49, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Examination of Queensland Audit Office Report 5: 2018-19-Follow-up of Bushfire prevention and preparedness
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 48, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Examination of Queensland Audit Office Report 3: 2018-19-Delivering shared corporate services in Queensland
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 47, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Examination of Queensland Audit Office Report 2: 2017-18-Managing the mental health of Queensland Police employees
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 46, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 12 June 2019 and 20 August 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 45, 56th Parliament, August 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 2 May and 11 June 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 44, 56th Parliament, August 2019-2019-20 Budget Estimates - Volume of Additional Information
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 44, 56th Parliament, August 2019-2019-20 Budget Estimates
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 42, 56th Parliament, June 2019-Oversight of the Queensland Family and Child Commission
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 41, 56th Parliament, June 2019-Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 40, 56th Parliament, June 2019-Oversight of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 39, 56th Parliament, June 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 27 February 2019 and 1 May 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 38, 56th Parliament, May 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 13 February 2019 and 26 February 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 34, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation between 14 November 2018 and 12 February 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 33, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation between 31 October 2018 and 13 November 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 28, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 17 October 2018 and 30 October 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 27, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 5 September 2018 and 16 October 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 25, 56th Parliament-Inquiry into the Strategic Review of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 24, 56th Parliament - Exempt subordinate legislation tabled on 5 July 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 23, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 22 August 2018 and 4 September 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 22, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 May 2018 and 21 August 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 18, 56th Parliament - 2018-19 Budget Estimates - Additional Information
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 18, 56th Parliament - 2018-19 Budget Estimates
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 16, 56th Parliament - Oversight of the Queensland Family and Child Commission
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 15, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 2 May 2018 and 15 May 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 14, 56th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 13, 56th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 12, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 21 March 2018 and 1 May 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 11, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 7 March 2018 and 20 March 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 10, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 February 2018 and 6 March 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 9, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 11 January 2018 and 15 February 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 6, 56th Parliament - Exempt subordinate legislation tabled on 23 October 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 5, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 11 October 2017 and 10 January 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 3, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 6 September 2017 and 10 October 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 2, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 9 August 2017 and 5 September 2017