Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee
Portfolio CommitteeBills Reviewed (61)
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 71, 56th Parliament-Child Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20202020-08-28
Committee findings
The Community Support and Services Committee examined the Child Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2020 and recommended it be passed. The bill had previously been examined by the Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee in the 56th Parliament, which also recommended passage. A significant majority of submissions opposed the bill's proposed changes to the permanency hierarchy, particularly regarding the inclusion of adoption as the third preference for non-Indigenous children, with strong concerns raised about the impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. The committee acknowledged these concerns but concluded that existing safeguards in the Child Protection Act and Adoption Act were sufficient.
- A significant majority of submissions opposed the proposed amendments to the permanency hierarchy, particularly the explicit inclusion of adoption as the third preference for achieving permanency for children in care
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander stakeholders, legal bodies and child protection organisations raised serious concerns about the potential impact on Indigenous children, citing the legacy of the Stolen Generations and the risk of disconnection from family, culture and community
- The Queensland Law Society and Bar Association of Queensland argued that Permanent Care Orders offered a less restrictive alternative to adoption that maintains family connections, and should be preferred
- Submitters called for greater investment in prevention and early intervention services to reduce the number of children entering the child protection system, noting that 84 per cent of child protection funding was directed at child removal rather than family support
- The department confirmed that only 10 children had been adopted from the child protection system in the previous seven years, and that the bill clarified existing options rather than introducing new powers
- The committee recommends the Child Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2020 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 70, 56th Parliament-Crime and Corruption Amendment Bill 20202020-08-21
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 4, 56th Parliament - Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20182018-03-15
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018, which replicated the lapsed 2017 bill from the 55th Parliament. As the bill was identical to the earlier version, the committee relied on evidence already gathered by its predecessor and did not seek further submissions. The committee recommended the bill be passed, supporting the proposed changes to the definition of corrupt conduct and the expansion of the Crime and Corruption Commission's investigatory jurisdiction.
- The bill replicated the content of the lapsed Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 from the 55th Parliament.
- The committee relied on evidence gathered by the previous committee and did not seek further submissions or hold hearings.
- The committee supported the proposed changes to the definition of 'corrupt conduct', noting differing stakeholder views but accepting the Department of Justice and Attorney-General's responses to concerns.
- The committee supported the expansion of the Crime and Corruption Commission's investigatory jurisdiction, considering it would help reduce corrupt conduct in the public sector.
- The bill gave effect to recommendations from the Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee's Reports Nos. 97 and 99.
- The committee recommends the Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 65, 56th Parliament-Corrective Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20202020-05-29
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving 14 submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed. Key areas of concern raised by stakeholders included the regulation of gel blasters as replica firearms, the blanket ban on transferring certain prisoners to low custody facilities, increased penalties for assaulting corrective services officers, and restrictions on payments to prisoners. LNP members filed a statement of reservation objecting to the gel blaster regulation and early parole release provisions.
- The bill implemented recommendations from the Crime and Corruption Commission's Taskforce Flaxton report to address corruption risks in Queensland prisons, including alcohol and drug testing of staff and broader search powers
- Stakeholders including the Queensland Human Rights Commission and Sisters Inside raised concerns that the blanket ban on transferring prisoners convicted of any sexual offence to low custody facilities was disproportionate and could affect children and those convicted of minor offences
- Firearms industry stakeholders broadly supported the permanent firearms amnesty but raised concerns about the regulation of gel blasters as replica firearms, noting the impact on small businesses and rural communities
- The Queensland Human Rights Commission and Sisters Inside argued the increased penalties for assaulting corrective services officers may be premature given the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council was concurrently reviewing such penalties
- Sisters Inside and the Prisoners' Legal Service raised concerns about restrictions on payments to prisoners, noting the disproportionate impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander prisoners and women in prison
- The committee recommends the Corrective Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2020 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 64, 56th Parliament-Co-operatives National Law Bill 20202020-03-27
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Co-operatives National Law Bill 2020 over seven weeks, receiving three submissions, holding a public departmental briefing and a public hearing. All submitters supported the bill. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding that while it raised several fundamental legislative principle and human rights concerns -- particularly regarding inspector powers, self-incrimination protections, and the automatic adoption of future amendments from NSW -- these were justified in the circumstances.
- All three submitters -- the Coochin Creek Fruitgrowers' Co-operative, the Co-operative Federation of Queensland, and the Business Council of Co-operatives and Mutuals -- supported the bill
- The bill would make Queensland the last state to adopt nationally harmonised co-operatives legislation, removing a competitive disadvantage for Queensland co-operatives trading across borders
- Key reforms include simplified financial reporting for small co-operatives (around 90 per cent of Queensland's 165 co-operatives), new fundraising provisions through co-operative capital units, modernised directors' duties, and automatic mutual recognition across jurisdictions
- The committee identified several breaches of fundamental legislative principles, including inspector powers to enter premises without a warrant, abrogation of the privilege against self-incrimination, and reversal of the onus of proof, but found all were justified
- Stakeholders raised that the threshold definition of 'small co-operative' was lower than for small proprietary companies, and the department agreed to raise this at the national level through the Co-operatives National Law Working Party
- The committee recommends the Co-operatives National Law Bill 2020 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 62, 56th Parliament-Electoral (Voter's Choice) Amendment Bill 20192020-03-16
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over five months, receiving nine submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, despite acknowledging arguments on both sides of the optional preferential voting debate. LNP members dissented, filing a Statement of Reservation supporting the bill's intent to restore optional preferential voting as recommended by the post-Fitzgerald Electoral and Administrative Review Commission.
- The bill sought to reintroduce optional preferential voting (OPV) for Queensland state elections, replacing the compulsory preferential voting (CPV) system restored in 2016.
- Supporters argued OPV gives voters greater choice and reduces informal voting rates, noting informality more than doubled from 2.11% to 4.34% after CPV was reintroduced at the 2017 election.
- Opponents raised concerns that OPV can devolve into a de facto first-past-the-post system, particularly when parties run 'Just vote 1' campaigns, potentially allowing candidates to win with less than half the vote.
- Stakeholders were divided on whether exhausted votes under OPV represent a valid expression of voter preference or an undemocratic loss of representation.
- Several submitters argued the bill's scope was too narrow and that broader electoral reform, including proportional representation, was needed to address the disconnect between vote share and parliamentary seats.
- The committee recommends that the Electoral (Voter's Choice) Amendment Bill 2019 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 60, 56th Parliament, February 2020-Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192020-02-21
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this omnibus bill, which proposes amendments to 33 Acts and four Regulations across areas including coronial services, the Criminal Code, court administration, and succession law. The committee received submissions from six stakeholders, held a public departmental briefing and a public hearing, and recommended the bill be passed. While the committee found the bill's objectives were sound and most amendments were justified, it noted several fundamental legislative principle issues including retrospective operation, abrogation of the privilege against self-incrimination in coronial inquests, and limitations on the right to trial by jury.
- The bill addresses issues identified by the State Coroner and the Queensland Auditor-General's Coronial Services Report, allowing all inquests to come under the modern Coroners Act 2003 regardless of when the death occurred
- Increasing the 'prescribed value' for summary disposition of indictable property offences from $30,000 to $80,000 drew concern from the Bar Association of Queensland and the Queensland Law Society, who warned it would impose a significantly greater burden on magistrates
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns about the bill's abrogation of the privilege against self-incrimination in reopened coronial inquests, calling it a departure from cornerstone principles of the justice system
- Broadening the definition of 'disorderly activity' under the Peace and Good Behaviour Act drew concern from the Queensland Law Society, which warned the broadly drawn provisions could be applied to political protest activity
- The committee was satisfied that breaches of fundamental legislative principles, including retrospective operation and limitations on jury trials, were sufficiently justified in the circumstances
- The committee recommends the Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 59, 56th Parliament, February 2020-Criminal Code (Child Sexual Offences Reform) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192020-02-07
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over approximately two months, receiving 26 submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed. The bill implements key recommendations from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council's report on child exploitation material, and creates new offences for child abuse objects (child sex dolls). Significant debate centred on mandatory reporting obligations for all adults, the application of failure-to-report and failure-to-protect offences to information gained during religious confession, and the retrospective application of certain sentencing reforms.
- Submitters broadly supported the bill's objectives of implementing Royal Commission recommendations, though many raised concerns about unintended consequences of the mandatory reporting regime for vulnerable groups including domestic violence victims and people with disability
- The application of failure-to-report obligations to religious confession was contentious, with Catholic Church representatives opposing it on grounds of religious freedom, while child protection organisations, the Queensland Human Rights Commission, and other stakeholders supported it as a justified limitation
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns about the breadth of the mandatory reporting obligation for all adults, its interaction with legal professional privilege, and the retrospective application of contemporary sentencing standards to historical offences
- The committee found all fundamental legislative principle issues were sufficiently justified, including retrospective operation, reversal of onus of proof, restrictions on jury directions, and limitations on religious freedom
- The pilot intermediary scheme for vulnerable witnesses in child sexual abuse proceedings was supported by all submitters who commented on it, with many suggesting it be expanded to additional classes of vulnerable witnesses
- The committee recommends that the Criminal Code (Child Sexual Offences Reform) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 55, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192019-11-04
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over seven weeks, receiving ten submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed. The Queensland Law Society raised significant concerns about the breadth of expanded electronic device access powers, arguing they could allow police unfettered access to digital information of people not suspected of any offence. Sex worker organisations strongly opposed proposed amendments to the Prostitution Act, and the Minister subsequently withdrew those provisions, referring sex industry regulation to the Queensland Law Reform Commission instead.
- The bill clarifies police powers to access information on or through electronic devices, replacing the ambiguous term 'stored information' with 'device information' to cover cloud, email and social media data.
- The Queensland Law Society strongly opposed the electronic device access amendments, arguing they grant extraordinarily broad powers with no requirement that police demonstrate reasonable grounds to access a specific device or account.
- The Queensland Police Service maintained the amendments do not expand existing powers but merely clarify terminology to resolve ambiguity identified in three sets of legal advice.
- Proposed amendments to the Prostitution Act were withdrawn after sex worker organisations raised concerns about expanded police and PLA powers of entry, the removal of anti-corruption protections, and risks to sex workers' privacy and safety.
- The committee identified fundamental legislative principle concerns regarding self-incrimination, search powers in domestic violence situations, and delegation of controlled operation approvals, but found all were justified by law enforcement and public safety considerations.
- The committee recommends that the Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 54, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Criminal Code (Trespass Offences) Amendment Bill 20192019-11-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill over six months, receiving 132 submissions and holding public hearings in Brisbane and Warwick. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, finding that the proposed penalties were excessive and disproportionate compared to existing offences, the bill's drafting was ambiguous in key areas, and existing Queensland laws already adequately addressed the conduct targeted by the bill. LNP members filed a statement of reservation dissenting from the majority position.
- The bill proposed three new Criminal Code offences (aggravated trespass, serious criminal trespass, organised trespass) with penalties up to 10 years imprisonment and $400,350 in fines, which the committee found disproportionate to existing trespass penalties of up to one year imprisonment
- The Queensland Law Society, Environmental Defenders Office, and Animal Justice Party argued that existing laws under the Summary Offences Act, Criminal Code, Transport Infrastructure Act, and Biosecurity Regulation already covered the conduct targeted by the bill
- The committee identified significant drafting issues, including that the serious criminal trespass offence (s 423) would capture persons lawfully on premises, not just trespassers, contrary to the bill's stated intent
- Business and farming groups including the QRC, QFF, AgForce, and Australian Pork supported the bill, citing biosecurity risks, economic losses, and the inadequacy of existing fines as deterrents
- Many submitters raised concerns that the bill would have a chilling effect on the right to protest and would deter whistleblowers from exposing animal cruelty or environmental harm
- The committee recommends the Criminal Code (Trespass Offences) Amendment Bill 2019 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 53, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Weapons and Other Legislation (Firearms Offences) Amendment Bill 20192019-11-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this Private Member's Bill introduced by Trevor Watts MP (LNP), which proposed firearm prohibition orders, new firearms offences, and increased penalties. The committee received nine submissions and held public hearings. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, citing a lack of stakeholder consultation, concerns about the breadth of police powers to impose firearm prohibition orders without judicial oversight, overlap with existing offences, and insufficient justification for significantly increased penalties. LNP members filed a Statement of Reservation supporting the bill.
- Multiple stakeholders including the Firearms Dealers Association, Shooters Union, and Queensland Women's Legal Service confirmed they were not consulted before the bill was introduced
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns that firearm prohibition orders should be imposed by a judicial officer rather than the Police Commissioner, to ensure proper oversight of powers that significantly affect individuals' rights
- Stakeholders including women's advocacy groups and the Public Health Association supported the intent of firearm prohibition orders to protect domestic violence victims and align Queensland with other states
- The Queensland Law Society argued that many proposed new offences were unnecessary as existing laws already addressed the relevant conduct, and that proposed penalties were disproportionate
- The committee identified multiple fundamental legislative principle concerns including impacts on rights and liberties, reversal of onus of proof, and compulsory acquisition of property without compensation
- The committee recommends that the Weapons and Other Legislation (Firearms Offences) Amendment Bill 2019 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 52, 56th Parliament, October 2019-Summary Offences and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192019-10-21
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill under a truncated timeframe after the government brought the reporting date forward from 4 November to 21 October 2019, citing ongoing protest activity. The committee received over 200 submissions, the vast majority opposing the bill, and held a public hearing on 11 October 2019. Despite substantial concerns raised about the bill's impact on the right to peaceful assembly and the adequacy of existing laws, the committee recommended the bill be passed. Deputy Chair James Lister MP filed a Statement of Reservation expressing concern that the bill's scope was too narrow and would have limited impact on protest activity.
- The majority of the 212 submissions opposed the bill, with key concerns being that it unduly restricted the right to peaceful assembly and gave police excessive search and seizure powers
- Multiple stakeholders, including the Queensland Law Society, Human Rights Law Centre, and Caxton Legal Centre, questioned whether existing laws were already sufficient to address the stated safety concerns
- The Queensland Human Rights Commissioner noted that the truncated committee process did not allow for careful analysis of whether the proposed restrictions on human rights were demonstrably justified
- The committee identified potential fundamental legislative principle issues regarding undue restriction of ordinary activities, proportionality of penalties, and the conferral of warrantless search powers on police
- Industry stakeholders such as Aurizon and the Queensland Resources Council supported the bill but suggested the definitions of dangerous attachment devices were too prescriptive and the penalties too minor
- The committee recommends the Summary Offences and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 51, 56th Parliament, October 2019-Community Based Sentences (Interstate Transfer) Bill 20192019-10-08
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over approximately six weeks, receiving four submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding the national scheme for interstate transfer of community based sentences to be sound. Stakeholders raised concerns about decision-making timeframes, the discretionary nature of transfer decisions, and the lack of a merits review process, but the committee was broadly satisfied with the department's responses. No dissenting views were filed.
- The bill establishes Queensland's participation in a national scheme for the formal transfer of community based sentences between Australian jurisdictions, with all states except Queensland and the Northern Territory having already implemented the model legislation.
- Stakeholders including Sisters Inside and the Queensland Law Society raised concerns about the absence of a statutory timeframe for deciding transfer requests and the lack of written reasons for refusal decisions.
- The committee noted that while judicial review is available under the Judicial Review Act 1991, there is no informal or merits review of a decision to decline registration of an interstate sentence.
- The committee identified potential fundamental legislative principle issues regarding privacy of offender information, administrative power, and natural justice, but was satisfied these were justified in the circumstances.
- Queensland Corrective Services advised there would be no significant increase in offender transfers under the scheme, with approximately 87 interstate offenders currently managed informally in Queensland and 147 Queensland offenders managed interstate.
- The committee recommends the Community Based Sentences (Interstate Transfer) Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 43, 56th Parliament, August 2019-Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192019-08-09
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 over two months, receiving 28 submissions and holding a public hearing with 12 stakeholder organisations. The committee recommended the bill be passed. While stakeholders broadly supported the bill's reforms to bail decision-making, information sharing, and protections for children in the justice system, several raised concerns about the child homicide sentencing provision and the need for adequate resourcing to implement the changes. LNP members filed a Statement of Reservation calling for a 72-hour cap on children's detention in watch houses.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the reformed bail decision-making framework, including the explicit presumption in favour of release and child-specific factors, noting that 87 per cent of young people in Queensland detention were unsentenced on any given day
- Several key stakeholders including the Queensland Law Society, Sisters Inside, and PeakCare opposed the child homicide aggravating factor provision, arguing the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council's recommendation was not intended to apply to children as defendants
- Privacy concerns were raised about the new information sharing framework, though the committee found sufficient safeguards existed including consent requirements, limited purposes, and penalties for misuse
- Stakeholders emphasised that legislative changes to bail would be ineffective without investment in accommodation, support services, and training for police and judicial staff
- The committee found the bill had sufficient regard to fundamental legislative principles, noting justifiable limitations on privacy rights in the interests of vulnerable children
- The committee recommends the Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 37, 56th Parliament, April 2019-Civil Liability (Institutional Child Abuse) Amendment Bill 20182019-04-30
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill, which sought to implement recommendations 89 to 94 of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, raising concerns about the breadth of key definitions, the retrospective application of the proposed duty of institutions, and fundamental legislative principle issues including that an individual could be nominated as a defendant without their consent. A parallel government bill (Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018) was addressing several of the same Royal Commission recommendations at the time.
- The majority of stakeholders supported the bill's objectives, including survivor advocacy groups such as Bravehearts, knowmore, and the Australian Lawyers Alliance, who emphasised the importance of extending civil liability beyond sexual abuse to include serious physical and connected abuse.
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns that the definitions of 'institution', 'official', and 'related entity' were too broad and could capture unintended parties such as facility owners with no direct relationship to the abuse.
- The committee found the nominated defendant provisions could allow an individual to be named as defendant without their consent and held responsible for liability, which it considered an undue impact on individual rights.
- The Queensland Law Society opposed the retrospective application of the proposed duty of institutions, arguing it created an unfair hurdle for institutions defending claims about past events.
- The committee noted that the government had introduced its own bill (the Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018) addressing overlapping Royal Commission recommendations 91 to 94.
- The committee recommends the Civil Liability (Institutional Child Abuse) Amendment Bill 2018 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 36, 56th Parliament, April 2019-Criminal Code and Other Legislation (Mason Jett Lee) Amendment Bill 20192019-04-16
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill introduced by David Janetzki MP, which proposed mandatory minimum non-parole periods for the murder of a child (25 years) and a new offence of child homicide (15 years). The committee received 14 submissions and held public hearings, with the overwhelming weight of stakeholder evidence opposing the mandatory sentencing provisions. The committee recommended the bill not be passed.
- The Queensland Law Society, Bar Association of Queensland, Crime and Corruption Commission, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service, PeakCare, PACT, and others all opposed the mandatory sentencing provisions in the bill.
- Stakeholders argued that mandatory sentencing removes judicial discretion, can produce unjust outcomes in individual cases, and has not been shown to deter offending in other jurisdictions.
- The Bar Association highlighted that the broad scope of the child homicide offence could capture cases involving negligence rather than deliberate violence, citing a case where a parent who left a child unattended in a bath would have faced a 15-year mandatory minimum.
- Several stakeholders raised concerns about the bill's potential disproportionate impact on vulnerable groups including Indigenous people, those with mental illness, and young offenders.
- The bill's explanatory notes claimed general consistency with fundamental legislative principles but did not detail or justify the inconsistencies arising from the removal of judicial discretion.
- The committee recommends the Criminal Code and Other Legislation (Mason Jett Lee) Amendment Bill 2019 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 35, 56th Parliament, April 2019-Criminal Code and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20192019-04-16
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving 14 submissions and holding a public hearing with seven stakeholder groups. The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting it implements the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council's recommendation on child homicide sentencing. Stakeholders were divided, with child protection organisations supporting the reforms while the Bar Association of Queensland, Queensland Law Society, and others raised serious concerns about expanding the definition of murder to include reckless indifference and the interaction with mandatory life sentencing. LNP committee members filed a statement of reservation, supporting the bill only if passed in conjunction with a related Private Member's Bill.
- The bill implements Recommendation 1 of the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council's review into sentencing for criminal offences arising from the death of a child
- Child protection groups broadly supported the reforms, while the Bar Association of Queensland, Queensland Law Society, and Queensland Council for Civil Liberties raised concerns about expanding the murder definition and mandatory sentencing consequences
- The Bar Association argued that expanding murder to include reckless indifference would capture lower-culpability conduct and impose disproportionate mandatory life sentences
- The Queensland Law Society and Women's Legal Service Queensland recommended the expanded murder definition be referred to the Queensland Law Reform Commission for further review
- The committee found the bill's amendments were justified with regard to fundamental legislative principles, including rights and liberties of individuals
- The committee recommends the Criminal Code and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 32, 56th Parliament, March 2019-Protecting Queenslanders from Violent and Child Sex Offenders Amendment Bill 20182019-03-19
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill over five months, receiving three submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, citing significant concerns about proportionality, the removal of judicial oversight in favour of executive review by the Governor in Council, and potential constitutional invalidity. LNP members filed a statement of reservation disagreeing with the committee's recommendation.
- All three submitters (Bar Association of Queensland, Queensland Advocacy Incorporated, and Queensland Law Society) raised concerns about the bill's scope and impact on individual rights
- The bill's definition of 'repeat offender' was considered overly broad, potentially capturing individuals convicted of two offences in the same proceeding
- The proposed indeterminate supervision orders, including lifetime GPS monitoring, were found to raise serious fundamental legislative principle issues around proportionality and personal liberty
- The bill would transfer review of supervision orders from the courts to the Governor in Council, removing the prisoner's right to present their case or be legally represented in the review process
- The Queensland Law Society raised significant concerns about the constitutional validity of the bill, noting it may go beyond the scope upheld by the High Court in Pollentine v Bleijie
- The committee recommends the Protecting Queenslanders from Violent and Child Sex Offenders Amendment Bill 2018 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 31, 56th Parliament, March 2019-Anti-Discrimination (Right to Use Gender-Specific Language) Amendment Bill 20182019-03-19
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over five months, receiving seven submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill not be passed, finding it inconsistent with the objectives of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 and with fundamental legislative principles. The committee concluded the bill would likely negatively impact transgender, gender diverse and intersex community members.
- The Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland advised that no one had approached it with the concerns the bill purported to address and considered the proposed amendments unnecessary or misconceived.
- Several stakeholders, including Caxton Legal Centre and the Australian Association of Social Workers, raised concerns the bill would increase discrimination against transgender, gender diverse and intersex people.
- The committee found the bill's proposed definition of indirect discrimination could prevent employers from introducing inclusive language policies, breaching fundamental legislative principles regarding rights and liberties of individuals.
- The proposal to extend anti-discrimination protections to businesses and organisations was found to be inconsistent with the framework of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991, which protects individuals rather than entities.
- The bill omitted the reasonableness and proportionality tests from its definition of indirect discrimination, making the prohibition too broad according to the Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland.
- The committee recommends the Anti-Discrimination (Right to Use Gender-Specific Language) Amendment Bill 2018 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 30, 56th Parliament, March 2019-Justice Legislation (Links to Terrorist Activity) Amendment Bill 20182019-03-07
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over approximately four months, receiving five submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed, acknowledging stakeholder concerns about erosion of the presumption of innocence and fettering of judicial discretion, but concluding that the unique risk posed by persons with terrorism links justified the departure from usual legal protections. Significant concerns were raised about the bill's application to children, its retrospective operation, and its potential to disincentivise rehabilitation.
- Stakeholders including the Bar Association of Queensland, the Queensland Law Society, and University of Queensland academics raised serious concerns about the erosion of the presumption of innocence and the fettering of judicial discretion in bail and parole decisions
- The Youth Advocacy Centre and other submitters warned that applying the presumption against bail and parole to children as young as 10 years of age conflicted with the Youth Justice Principles, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the recognition that children are less culpable than adults
- Multiple submitters argued that a presumption against parole would disincentivise prisoners from engaging in rehabilitation and deradicalisation programs, potentially resulting in less-rehabilitated individuals being released at the end of their sentences
- The committee considered several provisions raised potentially significant issues of fundamental legislative principle, including retrospective application of bail and parole restrictions and delegation of legislative power to expand the list of terrorism offences by regulation
- The committee accepted that Queensland's participation in the COAG commitment and the unique risk posed by persons with terrorism antecedents or associations justified the special measures despite the departure from fundamental legislative principles
- The committee recommends that the Justice Legislation (Links to Terrorist Activity) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 29, 56th Parliament, February 2019-Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20182019-02-28
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 over several months, receiving submissions and holding public hearings. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding that the reforms would improve fair access and outcomes for survivors of institutional child sexual abuse seeking civil damages. Opposition members filed a statement of reservation raising concerns about the absence of retrospectivity, the limitation of the bill to sexual abuse only, and the lack of vicarious liability provisions.
- The bill implements recommendations 91 to 94 of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse's Redress and Civil Litigation Report, introducing a duty of care on institutions with a reverse onus of proof.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the bill's intent but raised concerns about its prospective-only application, meaning past cases of abuse would not be covered by the new provisions.
- The Australian Lawyers Alliance and other submitters argued the bill should also introduce vicarious liability consistent with Royal Commission recommendations 89 and 90, rather than relying solely on a duty of care model.
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns that the definition of 'associated trust' in the bill was broader than the Royal Commission intended, potentially capturing trusts not connected to institutional abuse.
- The committee examined the reversal of the onus of proof in civil matters and found it was justified, noting institutions are best placed to demonstrate they took all reasonable steps to prevent abuse.
- The committee recommends the Civil Liability and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 26, 56th Parliament-Human Rights Bill 20182019-02-04
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Human Rights Bill 2018 over approximately three months, receiving 149 written submissions and 135 form submissions, holding a public briefing with the Department of Justice and Attorney-General, and conducting a public hearing with stakeholders. The committee recommended that the Bill be passed, noting broad support from the majority of submitters for the proposed dialogue model of human rights protection. Opposition members filed a statement of reservation expressing concerns about whether the Bill added substantive legal protection beyond existing law, the potential for frivolous complaints, and the impact of declarations of incompatibility on the separation of powers.
- The majority of stakeholders expressed support for the Bill and its dialogue model, which gives the executive, legislature, and courts each a role in protecting human rights while maintaining parliamentary sovereignty.
- The Bill draws primarily on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, with additional rights to education and health services from the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, modelled on Victoria's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities.
- Numerous submitters sought to expand the scope of protected rights beyond those in the Bill, including rights to housing, an adequate standard of living, environmental rights, and workplace rights, but the government considered a graduated approach appropriate.
- Significant debate arose over the obligations on public entities, with the Bill adopting a 'piggyback' cause of action model that does not create a standalone right to sue but allows human rights claims to be added to existing legal proceedings.
- The committee noted concerns from some submitters about the limitation clause (clause 13), the override declaration provision, and the potential impact of declarations of incompatibility on the traditional separation of powers.
- The committee recommends that the Human Rights Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 20, 56th Parliament - Criminal Code (Non-Consensual Sharing of Intimate Images) Amendment Bill 20182018-10-05
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over six weeks, receiving 18 submissions and holding a public hearing with legal, women's advocacy, and child protection organisations. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed, finding the new offences were necessary to close gaps in existing criminal laws that did not adequately cover all forms of non-consensual sharing of intimate images. The committee also called for a review of the new laws three years after commencement to ensure they remain effective as technology changes.
- Existing Queensland criminal offences did not adequately cover all forms of non-consensual sharing of intimate images, particularly where images were not made in private settings or where the requisite harm could not be proven.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the bill but raised concerns about the definition of consent in coercive relationships, the scope of the definition of intimate image, and the exclusion of images with religious or cultural significance.
- The Bar Association of Queensland, Queensland Law Society, and Queensland Council for Civil Liberties raised concerns that existing child exploitation material laws could criminalise young people engaged in consensual peer-to-peer sexting, and called for review of those laws.
- Several stakeholders emphasised the need for police training, community education, and a multi-faceted response alongside the new criminal offences to effectively address image-based abuse.
- The committee found the reversal of onus of proof for the defence provisions and the partially retrospective operation of rectification orders were justified in the circumstances.
- The committee recommends the Criminal Code (Non-consensual Sharing of Intimate Images) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 19, 56th Parliament - Liquor (Rural Hotels Concession) Amendment Bill 20182018-09-21
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee recommended the Liquor (Rural Hotels Concession) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed. The bill, a Private Member's Bill introduced by Robbie Katter MP, proposed reducing liquor licence fees by 90 per cent for approximately 110 commercial hotels in very remote Queensland. The committee relied on the extensive inquiry conducted by the previous parliament's committee into the substantially identical 2017 Bill, which included 19 submissions, roundtable discussions in seven remote towns, and public hearings. No dissenting views were recorded.
- Hotels in very remote Queensland serve as essential community hubs, providing meeting places, tourist information, accommodation, postal services and emergency contacts far beyond their role as licensed venues.
- The majority of stakeholders supported the bill, arguing it was unreasonable for very remote hotels with tiny populations to pay the same $3,630 annual licence fee as hotels in Brisbane.
- The Queensland Coalition for Action on Alcohol opposed the bill on public health grounds, noting that per-capita alcohol consumption is higher in remote areas, but the committee was not persuaded.
- Clubs Queensland raised concerns about competitive fairness for the 32 clubs in very remote areas, but the committee noted the fee difference would only be approximately $300 and found no evidence of clubs with 2,000 or more members in very remote areas.
- The committee found no issues with fundamental legislative principles and considered the use of the Australian Bureau of Statistics 'very remote Australia' classification to be a satisfactory criterion.
- The committee recommends the Liquor (Rural Hotels Concession) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 17, 56th Parliament - Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20182018-08-09
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this wide-ranging police powers bill over approximately two months, receiving five submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing with the Queensland Police Service, Queensland Corrective Services, and key legal stakeholders. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding that the proposed expansions of police powers — including new search powers for high-risk missing persons, a lowered crime scene threshold, and compelled access to locked electronic storage devices — were justified on balance, noting the safeguards built into the bill such as judicial oversight, body-worn camera recording requirements, and a mandatory five-year review by the Crime and Corruption Commission. The Bar Association of Queensland and Queensland Law Society raised concerns about civil liberties implications of several provisions, but the committee concluded the potential breaches of fundamental legislative principles were outweighed by community safety benefits.
- The bill's high-risk missing person search powers were an Australian first, with stakeholders divided between those supporting the new tools for police and those concerned about impacts on the rights of property owners and occupiers
- The Queensland Law Society and Bar Association of Queensland raised significant civil liberties concerns about multiple provisions including the lowered crime scene threshold, compelled disclosure of storage device passwords, and expanded breach-of-the-peace search powers
- The Crime and Corruption Commission, Protect All Children Today, and Queensland Council of Unions broadly supported the bill's objectives, particularly the enhanced protections for children and missing persons
- The committee found that the bill's safeguards — including judicial oversight, commissioned officer approval, electronic recording of powers used, and a mandatory CCC review after five years — adequately balanced expanded police powers against individual rights
- The Bar Association opposed extending the parole reapplication period for life-sentenced prisoners from six to twelve months, warning it could lead to a loss of hope and reduced rehabilitation efforts
- The committee recommends the Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 8, 56th Parliament - Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Amendment Bill 20182018-04-23
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over six weeks, receiving 10 submissions and holding a public hearing. All submitters supported the bill. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed, recognising that removing the requirement for married transgender people to divorce before updating their registered sex would have a significant positive impact for members of the LGBTIQ community.
- All 10 submitters unanimously supported the bill, including the Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland, the Human Rights Law Centre, and the LGBTI Legal Service.
- The bill was consequential to Commonwealth marriage equality legislation, which from 9 December 2018 would remove legal protections for state registry officers who refused to note sex reassignment for married persons.
- Under the existing law, married transgender people were forced to choose between legal recognition of their gender and legal recognition of their marriage, with divorce effectively requiring perjury if the relationship was harmonious.
- Several stakeholders described the amendment as the minimum necessary reform and called for broader changes to the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act, which the Government was already reviewing separately.
- The committee found no issues with fundamental legislative principles and considered the explanatory notes sufficient.
- The committee recommends the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 7, 56th Parliament - Guardianship and Administration and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20182018-03-23
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Guardianship and Administration and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018, which was substantially the same as a 2017 bill that lapsed when Parliament was dissolved. The committee relied on evidence gathered by the previous Parliament's committee, including 18 submissions and a public hearing with over a dozen witnesses. The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting broad stakeholder support for reforms to modernise Queensland's guardianship laws and strengthen safeguards for adults with impaired capacity. A Statement of Reservation was filed but its content was not available in the extracted report text.
- The bill implements recommendations from the Queensland Law Reform Commission's 2010 review of guardianship laws and aligns Queensland's guardianship legislation with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the reforms but raised concerns about the presumption of capacity provisions, with advocacy groups arguing the blanket reversal of the presumption after a QCAT order does not adequately recognise that capacity can fluctuate over time.
- The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service raised concerns that restrictions on who may be an eligible attorney or statutory health attorney could be limiting for remote Indigenous communities with small populations.
- Several stakeholders including the Queensland Law Society and Queensland Advocacy Incorporated sought stronger safeguards around conflict transactions, interim orders, and legal representation for adults with impaired capacity before QCAT.
- The committee examined fundamental legislative principle issues around delegation of administrative power by the Public Trustee and Public Guardian, and immunity from proceedings for whistleblowers reporting guardianship concerns.
- The committee recommends that the Guardianship and Administration and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 1, 56th Parliament - Police and Other Legislation (Identity and Biometric Capability) Amendment Bill 2018, government response2018-03-06
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 1, 56th Parliament - Police and Other Legislation (Identity and Biometric Capability) Amendment Bill 20182018-03-02
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over a short timeframe, holding a public hearing in Brisbane on 26 February 2018 with witnesses including the Privacy Commissioner. The committee recommended the bill be passed, while also recommending a review of the legislation two years after commencement to evaluate how the identity matching services were being used. The bill also included unrelated amendments to extend liquor trading hours on the Gold Coast during the 2018 Commonwealth Games.
- Identity crime costs Australia an estimated $2.2 billion annually and is a key enabler of serious and organised crime, including drug trafficking, money laundering, and terrorism.
- The bill proposed Queensland's participation in the Australia-wide Identity Matching Services, using biometric facial recognition technology to detect identity fraud that name-based checking cannot.
- All Australian jurisdictions had recognised the need for a comprehensive legislative response and agreed to utilise biometric facial recognition as the cornerstone for identity crime prevention.
- The Privacy Commissioner raised considerations about privacy safeguards during the committee's public hearing.
- The bill also included amendments to the Liquor Act 1992 to extend trading hours in the Broadbeach and Surfers Paradise safe night precincts during the 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games.
- The committee recommends the Police and Other Legislation (Identity and Biometric Capability) Amendment Bill 2018 be passed.
- The committee recommends that a review of the changes made by this legislation be conducted two years after its commencement to evaluate the frequency, purpose and type of identity matching services used, the users, the error rates and any incidences of service expansion.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 67, 55th Parliament - Penalties and Sentences (Drug and Alcohol Treatment Orders) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20172017-09-28
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The bill introduced Drug and Alcohol Treatment Orders (DATOs) as a new sentencing option, creating a judicially supervised rehabilitation pathway for offenders with severe substance use disorders. The committee heard from stakeholders including legal services and drug and alcohol agencies, and also considered provisions on criminal history disclosure, dangerous drug definitions, and protection of witnesses in domestic violence proceedings.
- The bill introduced Drug and Alcohol Treatment Orders combining custodial and rehabilitative components, managed by a multidisciplinary team including police, health, corrective services and Legal Aid
- The Brisbane drug court was intended to operate as a pilot from November 2017 until 2022, handling an estimated 80 to 125 offenders per year
- The Townsville Community Legal Service recommended a review of the Criminal Law (Rehabilitation of Offenders) Act 1986 to ensure it mirrors best practice and complies with international labour conventions
- The bill also amended the Evidence Act 1977 to prevent self-represented accused persons from cross-examining alleged victims in domestic choking or strangulation proceedings
- Stakeholders including the Queensland Council of Unions, Protect All Children Today, and Queensland Advocacy Incorporated broadly supported the bill's objectives
- The committee recommends the Penalties and Sentences (Drug and Alcohol Treatment Orders) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 66, 55th Parliament - Liquor (Rural Hotels Concession) Amendment Bill 20172017-09-25
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over six months, travelling to seven very remote Queensland communities to hold public roundtable discussions with hoteliers and local stakeholders. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed, finding broad support for reducing licence fees for hotels in very remote areas that serve as vital community hubs.
- Hotels in very remote areas play a vital role as community social hubs, tourist information points, and providers of accommodation and internet services
- The majority of stakeholders supported the bill, arguing it was unfair for remote hotels with far fewer patrons to pay the same licence fee as hotels in Brisbane
- The bill would reduce licence fees for approximately 110 hotels from around $3,630 to about $360, costing the Queensland Government approximately $300,000 in lost revenue
- Some stakeholders sought to extend the concession to clubs, coastal and regional areas, or to backdate the fee reduction, but these proposals were outside the scope of the bill
- The committee found no issues with fundamental legislative principles
- The committee recommends the Liquor (Rural Hotels Concession) Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 64, 55th Parliament - Honourable Angelo Vasta (Reversal of Removal) Bill 20172017-09-04
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill introduced by Mr Robbie Katter MP, which sought to reverse the 1989 parliamentary removal of Supreme Court Judge Angelo Vasta. The committee recommended the bill not be passed. While government members acknowledged concerns about the process and the lack of an appeal avenue, non-government members concluded there was no conclusive evidence the original decision was wrong.
- The 1989 removal of Mr Vasta was the only occasion since Federation that any Australian parliament has removed a Supreme Court judge
- The committee was concerned that the bill could provide grounds for Mr Vasta to seek reimbursement for lost wages, superannuation, and interest, despite assurances this was not intended
- Government members expressed concern about the removal process and the absence of any appeal avenue for Mr Vasta, even in light of new evidence
- Non-government members found no conclusive evidence that the 1989 decisions of the parliament and government were wrong, noting the decision was made during an extraordinary period in Queensland politics
- A 1995 International Commission of Jurists report had raised concerns about aspects of the original inquiry process
- The committee recommends the Honourable Angelo Vasta (Reversal of Removal) Bill 2017 not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 62, 55th Parliament - Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20172017-08-11
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The committee received four submissions and held a public briefing with the Queensland Police Service. While the committee acknowledged significant concerns raised by the Queensland Law Society, the Queensland Council for Civil Liberties, and the Office of the Information Commissioner about the expansion of police search and surveillance powers, it accepted the Queensland Police Service's justifications that the enhanced powers were necessary to respond effectively to terrorist incidents and critical emergencies.
- The bill significantly expands police powers to search electronic devices including mobile phones without a warrant during emergency situations and terrorist emergencies
- The Queensland Law Society, Queensland Council for Civil Liberties, and Office of the Information Commissioner raised concerns about privacy impacts, the abrogation of the right to silence through compelled device access, and the breadth of warrantless search powers
- The bill replaces the 'imminence test' for preventative detention orders with a lower 'capability threshold test', consistent with 2016 Commonwealth amendments
- The committee accepted the devolution of emergency declaration powers to approved senior sergeants, noting practical difficulties accessing commissioned officers in regional areas
- The bill provides limited derivative use immunity so that evidence found on devices during compelled searches is generally inadmissible for unrelated offences unless the offence carries at least seven years imprisonment
- The committee recommends that the Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 58, 55th Parliament - Corrective Services (No Body, No Parole) Amendment Bill 20172017-07-24
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving four submissions and holding a public briefing and public hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed, noting it would require the Parole Board to consider a prisoner's cooperation in locating a victim's body or remains before granting parole for homicide offences. Stakeholders including the Queensland Law Society, Bar Association, and Queensland Council for Civil Liberties raised concerns about the impact on wrongly convicted prisoners and the retrospective application of the amendments.
- The bill implements recommendation 87 of the Queensland Parole System Review conducted by Walter Sofronoff QC in 2016, requiring the Parole Board to evaluate a prisoner's cooperation in locating a victim's body before granting parole
- The Queensland Law Society, Bar Association, and Queensland Council for Civil Liberties raised concerns that genuinely innocent prisoners who have no knowledge of a body's location could be indefinitely detained
- The committee noted the bill does not impose an absolute rule that the body must be recovered — the Parole Board must consider a range of factors including the prisoner's capacity to cooperate
- As at 31 May 2017, of 427 prisoners in custody for homicide offences, 24 had been identified as likely to be captured by the provisions
- The committee considered the retrospective operation of the bill justified in the circumstances, despite concerns raised by the Bar Association about prisoners who had made genuine rehabilitation efforts
- The committee recommends the Corrective Services (No Body, No Parole) Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 57, 55th Parliament - Criminal Law (Historical Homosexual Convictions Expungement) Bill 20172017-07-14
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving 13 submissions and holding a public briefing and hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed. The bill establishes an administrative scheme to expunge historical convictions and charges for homosexual activity that occurred before 19 January 1991, when Queensland decriminalised consensual adult male homosexual activity. Non-government members supported passage but disagreed with the inclusion of 'public morality' offences, which were not recommended by the Queensland Law Reform Commission.
- The bill implements recommendations from the Queensland Law Reform Commission's 2016 report on expunging criminal convictions for historical gay sex offences, establishing an application-based administrative scheme
- Some submitters argued the scheme should be expanded to cover convictions between 19 January 1991 and 23 September 2016, when the age of consent for anal intercourse was standardised to 16, but the department maintained the bill was specifically about historical decriminalisation rather than age of consent differences
- The scheme allows applications on behalf of deceased persons and includes penalties of 100 penalty units for unauthorised disclosure of expunged conviction information
- The bill provides for three classes of eligible offences: Criminal Code male homosexual offences, public morality offences, and other offences that may be prescribed by regulation
- The committee considered fundamental legislative principle issues including the use of Henry VIII clauses to allow additional offences to be prescribed by regulation, but found these justified given the beneficial nature of the scheme
- The committee recommends the Criminal Law (Historical Homosexual Convictions Expungement) Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 55, 55th Parliament - Court and Civil Legislation Amendment Bill 20172017-05-15
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Court and Civil Legislation Amendment Bill 2017, an omnibus bill amending over 30 pieces of legislation to streamline court and tribunal processes, strengthen the Ombudsman's powers, modernise Legal Aid Queensland eligibility, and clarify various laws. The committee recommended the bill be passed. Non-government members filed a Statement of Reservation raising concerns about removing the requirement for the Legal Aid Queensland CEO to be a lawyer.
- The bill was broadly supported by stakeholders including the Shopping Centre Council, Protect All Children Today, and Ending Violence Against Women Queensland
- The bill was largely based on the lapsed Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2014 from the previous parliament
- Amendments to the Ombudsman Act 2001 strengthened integrity and accountability functions and protections for complainants and witnesses
- The bill proposed facilitating domestic violence notations on criminal histories and expanding privacy provisions to allow disclosure of personal information in certain cases
- Concerns were raised about removing the requirement for the Legal Aid Queensland CEO to be a legally qualified practitioner of at least five years' experience
- The committee recommends the Court and Civil Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 54, 55th Parliament - Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20172017-05-15
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving seven submissions and holding a public hearing with the Department of Justice and Attorney-General. The committee recommended the bill be passed. Non-government members filed a statement of reservation raising concerns about the broadened definition of corrupt conduct potentially overwhelming the Crime and Corruption Commission, and about the derivative use of compelled evidence.
- The bill broadens the definition of corrupt conduct by removing the subjective requirement that conduct be for the purpose of providing a benefit or causing a detriment
- The Queensland Law Society raised concerns that the expanded definition was exceptionally broad and could be construed too broadly
- The bill implements 10 of 23 recommendations from the Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee's review of the Crime and Corruption Commission
- The Queensland Police Union of Employees raised concerns about search warrants obtained for criminal investigations being used for misconduct complaints
- The bill introduces a requirement for the Commission to provide procedural fairness to persons adversely affected by publication of a Commission report
- The committee recommends the Crime and Corruption and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 53, 55th Parliament - Corrective Services (Parole Board) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20172017-04-28
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill and unanimously recommended it be passed. The bill implemented key recommendations from the Sofronoff QC review of Queensland's parole system, triggered by the alleged murder of an elderly woman by a paroled prisoner in 2016. The committee received four submissions and held public hearings with legal stakeholders and victims' groups.
- The bill established a single Parole Board Queensland to replace three existing parole boards, implementing the Sofronoff QC independent parole review recommendations
- The bill clarified powers for GPS electronic monitoring of parolees, ensuring corrective services officers could direct parolees to wear monitoring devices
- The Bar Association and Queensland Law Society raised concerns about expanded chief executive powers to suspend or cancel parole without a board decision, and the absence of judicial review for some parole decisions
- Sisters Inside raised concerns about the impact on women prisoners and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander prisoners, who are disproportionately affected by the corrections system
- The Queensland Homicide Victims' Support Group supported the reforms as improving community safety and victim notification
- The committee recommends the Corrective Services (Parole Board) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 50, 55th Parliament - Bail (Domestic Violence) and Another Act Amendment Bill 20172017-03-17
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over one month, receiving 32 submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on whether the bill should be passed. Government members considered the bill required more consultation and significant amendment, while non-government members urged passage, arguing the safety of domestic violence victims should take priority.
- The committee could not reach agreement on whether the bill should be passed
- Government members considered the bill needed more consultation and could have unintended consequences, particularly for women charged with reactive violence offences
- Stakeholders raised concerns about the cost and effectiveness of GPS tracking as a bail condition, with limited evidence it improves compliance with domestic violence orders
- Several submitters noted overlap with the Victims of Crime Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment Bill already before the House
- Non-government members strongly supported the bill, arguing it would strengthen protections for domestic violence victims
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 47, 55th Parliament - Criminal Law Amendment Bill 2016 : Erratum2017-03-03
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 47, 55th Parliament - Criminal Law Amendment Bill 20162017-02-21
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Criminal Law Amendment Bill 2016, receiving nine submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee recommended that the bill be passed. The bill's most significant reform was the abolition of the so-called 'gay panic' defence by excluding unwanted sexual advances from the partial defence of provocation in murder cases.
- The bill's primary objective was to prevent the use of an unwanted sexual advance as a basis for the partial defence of provocation, which reduces murder to manslaughter
- Queensland and South Australia were the only remaining Australian jurisdictions that had not abolished or limited the homosexual advance defence
- Stakeholders including the Queensland Law Society, Bar Association of Queensland, and LGBTI Legal Service Inc broadly supported the amendment to section 304 of the Criminal Code
- The bill also made miscellaneous amendments to the Bail Act, Criminal Proceeds Confiscations Act, Evidence Act, Jury Act, and other criminal law legislation
- The department advised it was unaware of any instances where an unwanted sexual advance had been the basis for claiming provocation since 2011
- The committee recommends that the Criminal Law Amendment Bill 2016 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 48, 55th Parliament - Liquor and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017, government response2017-03-01
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 48, 55th Parliament - Liquor and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20172017-02-24
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over a compressed 10-day timeframe and recommended it be passed. The committee considered stakeholder views on repealing liquor venue lock out provisions, with many submitters supporting the repeal. The Queensland Government accepted the committee's recommendation.
- Many submitters supported the repeal of lock out provisions, noting a lack of clear evidence that lock outs reduce offences or assaults
- The bill proposed to repeal lock out provisions retrospectively from 1 February 2017 to prevent compliance obligations during the interim period
- The Commissioner for Liquor and Gaming would retain power to impose lock outs on individual premises where considered necessary
- The committee considered the bill on an expedited timeline, reporting within 10 days of referral
- The committee recommends that the Liquor and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 49, 55th Parliament - Victims of Crime Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20162017-02-27
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The bill implemented recommendations from the statutory review of the Victims of Crime Assistance Act 2009, the Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence, and introduced a sexual assault counselling privilege for Queensland. The committee's single recommendation was that the bill be passed, with no dissenting views recorded.
- The bill simplified the victims of crime financial assistance application process by removing requirements for statutory declarations and medical certificates
- Maximum funeral assistance was increased and financial assistance categories were expanded to better support victims of domestic and family violence
- The bill introduced a sexual assault counselling privilege for Queensland, making it the last Australian jurisdiction to adopt such protections, based on the New South Wales legislative model
- Amendments expanded the definition of special witnesses to include victims of domestic violence offences, allowing them to give evidence via alternative arrangements
- The committee recommends that the Victims of Crime Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 42, 55th Parliament - Serious and Organised Crime Legislation Amendment Bill 20162016-11-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over seven weeks, receiving 282 submissions and holding public hearings on the Gold Coast and in Brisbane. The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on whether the bill should be passed. Non-government members filed a Statement of Reservation opposing the bill, arguing the underlying reviews were flawed and the changes would weaken law enforcement capabilities against organised crime.
- The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on whether the bill should be passed
- The bill drew on recommendations from three reviews: the Queensland Organised Crime Commission of Inquiry, the Taskforce on Organised Crime Legislation, and the statutory review of the Criminal Organisation Act 2009
- The Queensland Law Society expressed concern about the breadth of the proposed consorting offence and its potential to criminalise associations unrelated to criminal activity
- Non-government members argued the Taskforce review had a pre-determined outcome to repeal existing laws and was not a fair review
- 282 submissions were received, with many individual submitters opposing the repeal of the VLAD Act and expressing concern about the removal of police powers
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 41, 55th Parliament - Limitation of Actions (Institutional Child Sexual Abuse) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 and Limitation of Actions and Other Legislation (Child Abuse Civil Proceedings) Amendment Bill 20162016-11-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the government bill alongside a related private member's bill, receiving 23 submissions and holding public hearings. The committee recommended the government bill be passed and the private member's bill not be passed. Both government and non-government members supported the bill, though non-government members sought amendments to extend its scope beyond institutional settings to cover all child sexual abuse victims.
- The bill implemented recommendations from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse by retrospectively removing limitation periods for civil claims arising from child sexual abuse in institutional contexts
- Multiple stakeholders and witnesses called for the removal of limitation periods to be extended beyond institutional settings to cover all child sexual abuse, which was not included in the government bill
- Non-government members agreed the bill should pass but recommended amending it to extend coverage to non-institutional sexual abuse victims and to allow courts to reopen deeds of settlement in time-barred sexual abuse claims
- The bill also introduced a comprehensive statutory regime for class actions in Queensland and made amendments to the Legal Profession Act and the QCAT Act
- The committee examined the bill against fundamental legislative principles, noting the retrospective removal of limitation periods was justified given the unique circumstances of child sexual abuse survivors
- The committee recommends the Limitation of Actions (Institutional Child Sexual Abuse) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 be passed.
- The committee recommends the Limitation of Actions and Other Legislation (Child Abuse Civil Proceedings) Amendment Bill 2016 (private member's Bill) not be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 38, 55th Parliament - Health and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20162016-09-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over approximately three months, receiving 21 submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed, finding broad support for its key reforms including standardising the age of consent and enabling GP access to the Queensland Health database known as The Viewer. No dissenting views were recorded.
- Fourteen of twenty-one submissions addressed the Criminal Code amendments, with all but one supporting standardisation of the age of consent to 16 years for all forms of sexual intercourse
- Medical practitioners emphasised that the existing higher age of consent for anal intercourse was a barrier to young people seeking sexual health advice
- The Office of the Information Commissioner supported the policy intent of GP access to The Viewer but noted it would create a new privacy vulnerability, while endorsing the proposed privacy safeguards
- Independent Schools Queensland and the Queensland Catholic Education Commission raised concerns about the administrative burden of sharing student information for immunisation and dental programs
- The committee supported amendments to the QIMR Act allowing the institute to autonomously manage bonus payments to discoverers and inventors up to a $10 million annual cap
- The committee recommends the Health and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 28, 55th Parliament - Fire and Emergency Services (Smoke Alarms) Amendment Bill 2015 and Fire and Emergency Services (Domestic Smoke Alarms) Amendment Bill 2016, government response2016-08-24
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 28, 55th Parliament - Fire and Emergency Services (Smoke Alarms) Amendment Bill 2015 and Fire and Emergency Services (Domestic Smoke Alarms) Amendment Bill 20162016-05-23
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill alongside the government's Fire and Emergency Services (Domestic Smoke Alarms) Amendment Bill 2016, receiving 31 submissions and holding public hearings. Both bills sought to mandate photoelectric smoke alarms in all residential premises following the 2011 Slacks Creek house fire that killed 11 people. The committee was not able to reach a majority decision on whether to recommend either bill be passed, though all members agreed that photoelectric smoke alarms should replace ionisation alarms.
- Both bills responded to findings from the Coronial Inquest into the 2011 Slacks Creek house fire, which found that working photoelectric smoke alarms could have saved lives
- There was unanimous agreement across all committee members and stakeholders that ionisation smoke alarms should be replaced with photoelectric alarms, which respond faster to slow-burning fires and produce fewer false alarms
- The key disagreement was over interconnectivity requirements and implementation timeframes, with non-government members arguing the government bill's 10-year phase-in period was too long and that mandating interconnectivity would increase costs and slow adoption
- The committee's inquiry was informed by a concurrent Commonwealth Senate inquiry into smoke alarms, which made seven recommendations supporting photoelectric and interconnected alarms nationally
- Real estate industry representatives raised concerns about compliance costs and differing requirements for rental versus owner-occupied properties
- The committee notes the overwhelming evidence supporting the installation of photoelectric alarms and endorses such.
- The committee recommends smoke alarms comply with AS 3786-2014 and AS 1670.6-1997.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 33, 55th Parliament - Public Safety Business Agency and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20162016-08-02
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Public Safety Business Agency and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016, which implemented the Public Service Commission's 2015 review of the PSBA. The committee received submissions from the Queensland Police Commissioned Officers' Union, the United Firefighters' Union, and the PSBA itself, and held a public briefing. The committee unanimously recommended the bill be passed.
- The bill restructured the PSBA by establishing a Board of Management with a rotating chair between the QPS Commissioner, QFES Commissioner, and an external member, and replaced the CEO role with a Chief Operating Officer
- The Queensland Police Commissioned Officers' Union and the United Firefighters' Union both supported the proposed reforms
- The bill transferred Blue Card Services from the PSBA to the Department of Justice and Attorney-General, and integrated State Government Security into the Queensland Police Service
- The committee found the bill had sufficient regard to fundamental legislative principles, including appropriate safeguards for the transition of State Government Security officers
- The committee recommends the Public Safety Business Agency and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 32, 55th Parliament - Australian Crime Commission (Queensland) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20162016-08-02
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill, which covers the merger of CrimTrac into the Australian Crime Commission, amendments to police powers regarding evidence admissions, vehicle searches for knives, and fire and emergency services. The committee recommended the bill be passed, but government members filed a Statement of Reservation opposing the proposed amendment to section 439 of the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 regarding the admissibility of unrecorded confessions.
- The bill facilitates the merger of CrimTrac into the Australian Crime Commission, effective from 1 July 2016, and adds the CEO of AUSTRAC to the ACC Board
- The amendment to section 439 of the PPRA would give courts discretion to admit evidence of unrecorded admissions or confessions, addressing the decision in R v McMillan [2010]
- The Queensland Council for Civil Liberties raised concerns about reduced evidentiary safeguards, arguing the existing recording requirements protect against false confessions
- The bill adds the power for police to search vehicles for unlawfully possessed knives, closing a gap where knife detection was only a by-product of other search powers
- The bill also amends the Fire and Emergency Services Act 1990 and the Weapons Act 1990
- The committee recommends the Australian Crime Commission (Queensland) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 31, 55th Parliament - Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20162016-07-12
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 and recommended it be passed. The bill proposed amendments to four Acts to enhance counter-terrorism and emergency management powers. The committee identified several fundamental legislative principle concerns, particularly around administrative power, onus of proof, power to enter premises, protection against self-incrimination, and immunity from proceedings. No dissenting views were recorded.
- The bill proposed to amend the Public Safety Preservation Act 1986, Terrorism (Preventative Detention) Act 2005, Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000, and Corrective Services Act 2006 to enhance counter-terrorism powers.
- The Queensland Council for Civil Liberties raised concerns about the breadth of emergency powers, including powers to declare evacuation areas, search without safeguards, and retain biometric information after prisoners have served their sentences.
- The Bar Association of Queensland argued that the power to extend a terrorist emergency should rest with the Supreme Court rather than the Premier, and sought additional safeguards for biometric data collection.
- The committee identified potential fundamental legislative principle issues regarding administrative power, reversal of onus of proof, power to enter premises, self-incrimination protections, and immunity from proceedings.
- The Queensland Nurses Union supported corrective services amendments on the condition that nurses are assessed as competent for the required examinations and workloads are monitored.
- The committee recommends the Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 29, 55th Parliament - Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20162016-06-06
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill over six weeks, receiving 13 submissions. The committee was unable to reach agreement on whether the bill should be passed. The bill sought to close the Childrens Magistrates Court when hearing youth justice matters, increase the transfer age from youth detention to adult corrections from 17 to 18, and reinstate court-referred youth justice conferencing. Non-government members filed a Statement of Reservation opposing the bill.
- The bill represented the second stage of amendments to reverse changes made by the former LNP Government's Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2014, emphasising early intervention and rehabilitation over punitive measures
- Consultation showed 81 per cent of respondents supported the measures in full, including 92 per cent supporting victims being present in closed court and 86 per cent supporting the reinstatement of youth justice conferencing
- The government allocated $23.6 million over four years to reinstate and enhance court-referred youth justice conferencing, aiming to increase conferences from 870 to 3,000 per year
- Stakeholders broadly supported the bill's restorative justice approach, though some raised concerns about potential duplication of referral pathways between police-referred and court-referred conferencing
- The committee examined fundamental legislative principle issues regarding clause 16, which proposed a restorative justice process that could affect the rights and liberties of individuals
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 25- Penalties and Sentences (Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council) Amendment Bill 2016, government response2016-05-24
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 25, 55th Parliament - Penalties and Sentences (Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council) Amendment Bill 20162016-04-29
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Penalties and Sentences (Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council) Amendment Bill 2016 and made two technical amendment recommendations. The committee recommended replacing the word 'suffering' with appropriate terminology in the council membership provisions, and inserting the word 'present' to clarify meeting quorum procedures. The Queensland Government accepted both recommendations and moved amendments during consideration in detail.
- The bill establishes the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council (QSAC) to provide independent research-based sentencing advice and obtain community views on sentencing matters.
- The committee identified that the word 'suffering' in proposed section 201(3)(d) was inappropriate terminology and should be replaced.
- Queensland Advocacy Incorporated raised concerns about excluding people convicted of indictable offences from QSAC membership, arguing their experience is relevant to the council's community consultation functions.
- Government members separately supported an amendment to require at least one woman be appointed to the QSAC.
- The committee recommends that the bill be amended to delete the word 'suffering' in proposed section 201(3)(d) of the Penalties and Sentences Act and to replace it with appropriate terminology.
- The committee recommends that the bill be amended to insert the word 'present' in proposed section 203F(3) of the Penalties and Sentences Act, such that the section reads: 'If neither the chairperson nor deputy chairperson is present at a meeting, a member of the council chosen by the members present presides.'
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 23, 55th Parliament - Criminal Law (Domestic Violence) Amendment Bill (No. 2) 20152016-03-07
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee recommended the bill be passed, implementing key recommendations from the Special Taskforce on Domestic and Family Violence in Queensland (the 'Not Now, Not Ever' report). The committee received 20 submissions and held public hearings, finding broad support for the bill's reforms. The committee requested the Attorney-General address submitter concerns about consent, reckless indifference, and the bill's application to juveniles during the second reading debate.
- The bill implemented taskforce recommendations by creating domestic and family violence as an aggravating factor on sentence and introducing a new standalone offence of choking, suffocation or strangulation in a domestic setting
- The Women's Legal Service confirmed that non-fatal strangulation is 'very common' in domestic violence relationships and sends a message of ultimate control over victims
- The Queensland Indigenous Family Violence Legal Service reported that the existing strangulation offence under section 315 of the Criminal Code had never been used in their experience due to its requirement to prove intent to commit another indictable offence
- Submitters raised concerns about elements of the proposed section 315A offence, including the concept of reckless indifference to consent and the scope of 'domestic setting' and 'domestic relationship'
- The bill also restored courts' discretion to hear sentencing submissions from parties, following the 2014 High Court decision in Barbaro v The Queen which had disrupted longstanding Queensland sentencing practice
- The committee recommends that the Criminal Law (Domestic Violence) Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2015 be passed.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 22, 55th Parliament - Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015 : Erratum2016-03-03
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 22, 55th Parliament - Youth Justice and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20152016-03-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill (Report No. 22, 55th Parliament). The committee received 28 submissions from a range of stakeholders including Legal Aid Queensland, the Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland, the Bar Association of Queensland, and several child and youth advocacy organisations. The full report text is not available in the database; only an erratum correcting the submissions list was extracted.
- The committee received broad engagement from legal, child protection, Indigenous and human rights organisations
- Submitters included Legal Aid Queensland, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service, the Human Rights Law Centre, and Amnesty International
- The full committee report and recommendations are not available for analysis
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 21, 55th Parliament - Crime and Corruption Amendment Bill 20152016-03-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill, which amends the Crime and Corruption Act 2001 to implement recommendations from the Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee's review of the Crime and Corruption Commission. The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on whether to recommend the bill be passed. Key contentious issues included the removal of statutory declaration requirements for complaints (allowing anonymous complaints), the definition of 'bipartisan support' for CCC appointments, and the restoration of the CCC's corruption prevention and independent research functions.
- The committee could not reach a majority decision on a motion to recommend the bill be passed, so the motion failed under section 91C(7) of the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001
- The bill proposed removing the requirement for complaints to the CCC to be made by statutory declaration, allowing anonymous complaints to foster a culture encouraging corruption reporting
- The Local Government Association of Queensland and Professor Sampford raised concerns that anonymous complaints could be misused for political purposes, while supporting confidentiality for genuine complainants
- The bill required bipartisan PCCC support for the appointment of the CCC CEO, replacing the existing veto power, but concerns were raised about the definition of 'bipartisan support' permitting crossbench substitution for opposition members
- The bill restored the CCC's corruption prevention and independent research functions, which the CCC and other stakeholders broadly supported
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 20, 55th Parliament - Tackling Alcohol-fuelled Violence Legislation Amendment Bill 20152016-02-08
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this bill over three months, receiving 767 submissions, conducting site visits to Sydney, Newcastle, Brisbane, Cairns, Townsville and the Gold Coast, and hearing from Queensland Police, health professionals and industry stakeholders. The committee was unable to reach a majority decision to recommend the bill be passed. It made three procedural recommendations regarding data collection, post-implementation evaluation, and drafting issues. Government members made two additional recommendations on takeaway liquor trading hours and renaming 'lockout' to 'one way door'.
- The committee could not reach a majority decision to recommend the bill be passed, reflecting deep division over the proposed alcohol trading hour restrictions
- Approximately 746 of 767 submissions opposed the bill, with strong objections from the hospitality industry
- Health professionals and police broadly supported reduced trading hours, citing evidence from the Newcastle model showing reduced alcohol-related violence
- Non-government members argued the previous Safe Night Out strategy should be given more time, noting early police data showed assaults had decreased by 9 per cent across Safe Night Precincts
- The exemption of casinos from trading hour reductions was raised as creating an uneven playing field
- The committee recommends appropriate data on alcohol-related incidents be collected and available from agencies which this bill affects, for example Queensland Police, Queensland Health and Queensland Ambulance Service.
- The committee recommends that should the bill be passed there be a thorough evaluation of the changes in the community as a result of the bill's implementation, eighteen months from commencement.
- The committee recommends the government address the drafting issues identified in section 3.1.7 of the report.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 16, 55th Parliament - Electoral (Improving Representation) and Another Act Amendment Bill 20152015-11-27
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this private member's bill introduced by Robbie Katter MP, which proposed increasing Queensland's electoral districts from 89 to 93, requiring bipartisan support for Electoral Commission appointments, and appointing a demography expert to the Commission. The committee was unable to reach a majority decision to recommend the bill be passed. The committee received five submissions and noted uncertainty about whether adding four seats would meaningfully improve representation in large remote electorates.
- The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on a motion to recommend the bill be passed, so the question on the motion failed
- The Crime and Corruption Commission noted the bill's proposals could strengthen protections against corruption by ensuring Electoral Commission appointments have bipartisan support
- Submitters questioned whether a fixed increase of four seats would achieve lasting improvements in representation without embedding a population-based quota formula in legislation
- The committee identified a potential issue with the validity of the 2016 electoral redistribution if existing commissioners had not been appointed under the proposed bipartisan process
- No issues of fundamental legislative principle were identified
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 14, 55th Parliament - Relationships (Civil Partnerships) and Other Acts Amendment Bill 20152015-11-17
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill, which sought to restore civil partnership ceremony provisions removed by the Newman Government in 2012. The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on whether to recommend the bill be passed, meaning the motion to recommend passage failed. The committee found no issues with fundamental legislative principles. Government members filed a statement of reservation expressing concern that the report excluded evidence from submitters who shared personal stories about how the bill would change their lives.
- The bill sought to restore provisions allowing couples of any gender to hold a civil partnership ceremony before registering their relationship, reversing changes made by the Newman Government in 2012
- The committee received 29 submissions and held a public hearing, with both strong support and opposition from sections of the public
- The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on a motion to recommend the bill be passed, and the motion failed under section 91C(7) of the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001
- The committee found no issues with fundamental legislative principles
- Supporters argued the bill would support equal rights for LGBTI Queenslanders, while opponents argued civil partnership ceremonies mimicked marriage
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 13, 55th Parliament - Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-11-11
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 13, 55th Parliament - Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20152015-11-02
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed, with three additional recommendations all supported by the Queensland Government. The committee focused on safeguards around preventative detention orders, including enhanced parliamentary reporting requirements and an earlier independent review of the legislation.
- The bill would extend the Terrorism (Preventative Detention) Act 2005 for a further ten years, continuing preventative detention powers for counter-terrorism purposes
- The committee sought stronger accountability mechanisms, recommending the Minister report to Parliament within six months of any use of preventative detention powers
- The committee recommended bringing forward the independent review of the Act from four years to two years after commencement
- The bill also extended the territorial application of counter-terrorism legislation from three nautical miles to 200 nautical miles from the Queensland coast
- The committee also examined fire safety regulation in budget accommodation and civil liability protections for police service review commissioners
- The committee recommends that the Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015 be passed.
- The committee recommends the bill be amended to require the Minister to provide a stand-alone report to Parliament within six months of the use of powers under the Terrorism (Preventative Detention) Act 2005.
- The committee recommends the Act be amended to require an independent review to occur within two years of the Act's commencement, with a report required no later than within three years of the Act's commencement.
- The committee recommends the Minister advise the House of whether the government is progressing further work with local government authorities in respect of improving fire safety regulation in budget accommodation.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 8, 55th Parliament - Liquor and Fair Trading Legislation (Red Tape Reduction) Amendment Bill 20152015-09-14
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 80 - Weapons (Digital 3D and Printed Firearms) Amendment Bill 2014, government response2015-05-07
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee recommended the private member's bill be passed, with two additional recommendations. The committee recommended reducing the proposed craft brewery production threshold from 40 million litres to five million litres per year, and updating the bill's title to reflect that it amends legislation beyond liquor and fair trading. Government members expressed reservations about four aspects of the bill, including relaxing approved manager availability requirements, exempting campdrafting events from community liquor permits, and allowing after-hours alcohol consumption in hotel foyers.
- The bill was a private member's bill resubmitting reforms from a 2014 bill that did not proceed, developed through several years of consultation via a Liquor and Gaming Red Tape Reduction Expert Panel
- Five of six submitters raised concerns about proposed relaxation of conditions for craft beer sales at promotional events, with debate about whether the 40 million litre threshold was too generous
- Government members opposed several provisions including relaxing manager on-site requirements, exempting campdrafting events from liquor permits, and extending alcohol access to hotel foyers
- Government members recommended delaying repeal of 14 obsolete church and community organisation Acts until Crown Solicitor advice on the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse had been received
- The committee identified fundamental legislative principle issues regarding use of car parks for liquor sales and the definition of 'liquor' being expandable by regulation
- The committee recommends that the Liquor and Fair Trading Legislation (Red Tape Reduction) Amendment Bill 2015 be passed.
- The committee recommends that the bill be amended to change the definition of 'craft brewery' such that the proposed maximum threshold of 40 million litres of beer produced in any one year period under licence be replaced with five million litres.
- The committee recommends that the bill be amended so that its title indicates that legislation other than liquor and fair trading legislation is changed by the bill, through the insertion of 'and Other Legislation' in its title.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 6, 55th Parliament - Electoral (Redistribution Commission) and Another Act Amendment Bill 20152015-09-11
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined this Private Member's Bill which proposed changes to the Queensland Redistribution Commission's size, appointment process, and the number of seats in the Legislative Assembly. The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on whether the bill should be passed, with non-government members supporting the bill and government members opposing it. No formal recommendation for passage was made.
- The bill proposed three main changes: increasing the Redistribution Commission from three to five members, giving the commission power to determine the number of electoral districts (up to 94 seats), and increasing the additional large district number formula from 2% to 4%
- Non-government committee members considered the bill should pass, while government members opposed it, resulting in a deadlocked committee
- The committee received 16 written submissions from political parties, local councils, the Crime and Corruption Commission, the Local Government Association, the Clerk of the Parliament, and others
- The bill sought to implement longstanding recommendations from the Electoral and Administrative Review Commission (EARC) dating back to 1990 that had not been adopted
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 5, 55th Parliament - Queensland Training Assets Management Authority Repeal Bill 20152015-07-07
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Queensland Training Assets Management Authority Repeal Bill 2015 but was unable to reach a majority decision on whether the bill should be passed. Government members supported the bill while non-government members opposed it. The committee received approximately 60 submissions and found that while TAFE campus closures, job losses, and course reductions had caused distress, these were not attributable to QTAMA but to separate decisions by the Department of Education and TAFE Queensland.
- The committee was unable to reach a majority decision on whether the bill should be passed, with government members in favour and non-government members opposed.
- The committee found that increases in student costs, reductions in course offerings, and campus closures were not caused by QTAMA but resulted from separate decisions by the Department of Education and Training and TAFE Queensland during its consolidation from 13 separate institutes.
- Unions and TAFE Directors Australia supported the bill, arguing QTAMA's purely commercial approach was not cognisant of the broader economic and social benefits of public training infrastructure.
- The Australian Council for Private Education and Training and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry Queensland opposed the bill, favouring the QTAMA model and a contestable VET market.
- The committee noted that despite perceptions, no rent had been paid by TAFE Queensland to QTAMA, and communication about the reform process needed improvement.
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 1 - Electoral and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, government response2015-05-07
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 1, 55th Parliament - Electoral and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20152015-05-01
Committee findings
The Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee examined the Electoral and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015 and tabled its report on 1 May 2015. The committee made three recommendations, all focused on clarifying penalty provisions in new section 264(9) relating to third party disclosure obligations. The government accepted the third recommendation in part, proposing amendments to clarify obligations for candidates and political parties regarding return requirements for gifts.
- The committee identified ambiguity about which party a penalty applies to under new section 264(9)
- The committee sought clarification on the consequences of a candidate failing to inform a third party of their return obligations
- The government confirmed that third parties are obliged to disclose gifts whether or not they are informed by the recipient candidate
- The government proposed amendments during consideration in detail to clarify obligations for candidates and political parties
- The committee recommends that the Attorney-General clarifies to which party a penalty applies in respect of new section 264(9).
- The committee recommends that the Attorney-General advises the House of the consequence of a candidate failing to inform the third party that they must provide a return under section 264, and whether the failure to inform the third party might be a defence for their failure to provide such a return.
- The committee recommends that the Attorney-General amends the Bill to ensure clarity in respect of the application of the penalty proposed in new section 264(9).
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 80 - Weapons (Digital 3D and Printed Firearms) Amendment Bill 2014, interim government response2015-01-22
Inquiries (101)
Other Reports (103)
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 79, 56th Parliament-Consideration of Auditor-General Report 21: 2018-19-Delivering forensic services
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 78, 56th Parliament-Annual Report 2019-20
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 77, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 26 June 2020 and 14 July 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 76, 56th Parliament-Oversight of the Family Responsibilities Commission
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 75, 56th Parliament-Oversight of the Queensland Family and Child Commission
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 74, 56th Parliament-Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 73, 56th Parliament-Oversight of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 72, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 20 May 2020 and 25 June 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 69, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 23 April 2020 and 19 May 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 68, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 18 March 2020 and 22 April 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 67, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 5 February 2020 and 17 March 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 66, 56th Parliament-Inquiry into the Electoral Commission of Queensland's online publication of the preliminary and formal counts of the votes cast in the 2020 quadrennial local government election and the Bundamba and Currumbin state by-elections held on 28 March 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 63, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 27 November 2019 and 4 February 2020
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 61, 56th Parliament, March 2020-Exempt subordinate legislation tabled 21 October 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 58, 56th Parliament, December 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 October 2019 and 26 November 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 57, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 21 August 2019 and 15 October 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 56, 56th Parliament, November 2019-Annual Report 2018-19
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 50, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Examination of Queensland Audit Office Report 6: 2018-19-Delivering coronial services
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 49, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Examination of Queensland Audit Office Report 5: 2018-19-Follow-up of Bushfire prevention and preparedness
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 48, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Examination of Queensland Audit Office Report 3: 2018-19-Delivering shared corporate services in Queensland
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 47, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Examination of Queensland Audit Office Report 2: 2017-18-Managing the mental health of Queensland Police employees
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 46, 56th Parliament, September 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 12 June 2019 and 20 August 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 45, 56th Parliament, August 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 2 May and 11 June 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 44, 56th Parliament, August 2019-2019-20 Budget Estimates - Volume of Additional Information
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 44, 56th Parliament, August 2019-2019-20 Budget Estimates
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 42, 56th Parliament, June 2019-Oversight of the Queensland Family and Child Commission
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 41, 56th Parliament, June 2019-Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 40, 56th Parliament, June 2019-Oversight of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 39, 56th Parliament, June 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 27 February 2019 and 1 May 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 38, 56th Parliament, May 2019-Subordinate legislation tabled between 13 February 2019 and 26 February 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 34, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation between 14 November 2018 and 12 February 2019
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 33, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation between 31 October 2018 and 13 November 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 28, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 17 October 2018 and 30 October 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 27, 56th Parliament-Subordinate legislation tabled between 5 September 2018 and 16 October 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 25, 56th Parliament-Inquiry into the Strategic Review of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 24, 56th Parliament - Exempt subordinate legislation tabled on 5 July 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 23, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 22 August 2018 and 4 September 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 22, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 May 2018 and 21 August 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 18, 56th Parliament - 2018-19 Budget Estimates - Additional Information
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 18, 56th Parliament - 2018-19 Budget Estimates
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 16, 56th Parliament - Oversight of the Queensland Family and Child Commission
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 15, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 2 May 2018 and 15 May 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 14, 56th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 13, 56th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 12, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 21 March 2018 and 1 May 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 11, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 7 March 2018 and 20 March 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 10, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 February 2018 and 6 March 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 9, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 11 January 2018 and 15 February 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 6, 56th Parliament - Exempt subordinate legislation tabled on 23 October 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 5, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 11 October 2017 and 10 January 2018
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 3, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 6 September 2017 and 10 October 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 2, 56th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 9 August 2017 and 5 September 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 73, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 14 June 2017 and 8 August 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 72, 55th Parliament - Annual Report 2016-17
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 71, 55th Parliament - Review of the Auditor General's Report to Parliament No. 14: 2016-17 Criminal Justice System - Reliability and Integration of Data
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 70, 55th Parliament - Review of the Auditor General's Report to Parliament No. 4: 2016-17 Criminal Justice System - Prison Sentences
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 69, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 68, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 65, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Criminal Organisation Public Interest Monitor
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 63, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 10 May 2017 and 13 June 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 61, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between22 March 2017 and 9 May 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 60, 55th Parliament - 2017-18 Budget Estimates - Additional Information
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 60, 55th Parliament - 2017-18 Budget Estimates
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 59, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 1 March 2017 and 21 March 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : 2017-18 Budget Estimates - Responses to Questions taken on Notice - Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Services and Minister for Corrective Services
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 56, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 15 February and 28 February 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee: Report No. 52, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 30 November 2016 and 14 February 2017
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 51, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 2 November and 29 November 2016
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 46, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 12 October and 1 November 2016
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 45 - Subordinate legislation tabled between 31 August and 11 October 2016
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 36 - Oversight of the Information Commissioner, government response
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 44, 55th Parliament - Annual Report 2015-16
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 43, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 15 June and 30 August 2016
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 40, 55th Parliament - Report on various Auditor-General reports referred to the Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee in 2015 and 2016
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 39, 55th Parliament - Review of the Auditor-General's Report to Parliament 4: 2013-14 Follow up - Management of offenders subject to supervision in the community
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 37, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 16 March 2016 and 14 June 2016
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 36, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 35, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 34, 55th Parliament - 2016-17 Budget Estimates - Additional Information - Part 2
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 34, 55th Parliament - 2016-17 Budget Estimates - Additional Information
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 34, 55th Parliament - 2016-17 Budget Estimates
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 30, 55th Parliament - Inquiry into a possible Human Rights Act for Queensland
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 27, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation 2015 No. 172: Child Protection (Offender Reporting) Regulation 2015
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 26, 55th Parliament - Subordinate legislation tabled between 2 December 2015 and 15 March 2016
Letter, dated April 2016, from the Information Commissioner, Ms Rachael Rangihaeata, to the Chair of the Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee, Mr Mark Furner MP, enclosing a report prepared under section 131 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld)
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 24, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 28 October 2015 and 1 December 2015
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 17, 55th Parliament - 'Lemon' Laws - Inquiry into consumer protections and remedies for buyers of new motor vehicles, government response
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 9, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner, government response
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 19, 55th Parliament - Review of the Auditor-General's Report to Parliament No. 10: 2014-15 - Bushfire Prevention and preparedness
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 18, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Criminal Organisation Public Interest Monitor
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 17, 55th Parliament - 'Lemon' Laws - Inquiry into consumer protections and remedies for buyers of new motor vehicles
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 15, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 15 July 2015 and 27 October 2015
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 12, 55th Parliament - Annual Report 2014-15
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 11, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 6 May 2015 and 14 July 2015
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 10, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Queensland Ombudsman
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 9, 55th Parliament - Oversight of the Office of the Information Commissioner
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 7, 55th Parliament - 2015 -16 Budget Estimates - Additional Information
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 7, 55th Parliament - 2015 -16 Budget Estimates
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 4, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 13 January 2015 and 5 May 2015
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 82 - Inquiry on strategies to prevent and reduce criminal activity in Queensland, government response
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 3, 55th Parliament - Portfolio subordinate legislation tabled between 25 November 2014 and 12 January 2015
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 2, 55th Parliament - Subordinate Legislation tabled between 14 October and 24 November 2014
Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee : Report No. 82 - Inquiry on strategies to prevent and reduce criminal activity in Queensland, interim government response