State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee
Portfolio CommitteeMembers (6)
Bills Reviewed (9)
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 26, 58th Parliament— Transport and Other Legislation (Managing E-mobility Use and Protecting Our Communities) Amendment Bill 20262026-05-08
Committee findings
The State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee examined the Bill, which overhauls the rules for e-bikes and personal mobility devices in Queensland by introducing a new compliance standard (EN 15194), driver-licence and minimum-age requirements, footpath speed limits, restrictions on sales to children, and new police powers to seize and destroy non-compliant 'prohibited bikes'. The inquiry drew more than 3,000 submissions and public hearings. The committee recommended that the Bill be passed, but made eight further recommendations for amendments and government action, particularly to provide exemptions for people with disability and adaptive devices, refine the EN 15194 standard, and adjust the footpath speed limit. The three Labor members issued a statement of reservation opposing the Bill and recommending it be withdrawn and redrafted.
- Many submitters supported the Bill's intent to improve safety and crack down on illegal, high-powered and non-compliant devices, including stronger police seizure powers.
- Stakeholders, disability and accessibility advocates raised serious concerns that the EN 15194 standard and the new driver-licence requirement would unfairly exclude people with disability, older people and those using adaptive devices such as e-trikes and e-cargo bikes.
- Industry and retailers warned of significant cost and practical difficulties in making previously legal devices compliant, verifying buyers' ages, and meeting the proposed obligations within the six-month transition period.
- A uniform 10km/h footpath speed limit was contested, with the Gold Coast City Council and others arguing it was not supported by evidence or the department's own guidelines, prompting the committee to recommend a more targeted approach.
- Submitters widely called for greater investment in separated cycling and walking infrastructure to support safe e-mobility use, which the Bill does not fund.
- The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
- That the Bill be amended to allow compliance with the version of the EN 15194 standard that was in place when an EPAC was manufactured, with the definition clear and unambiguous and allowing recognition of future versions of the standard; and that the Bill be amended to include an appropriate standard for compliant e-cargo bikes with a maximum pedal-assisted speed of 25km/h.
- That the Queensland Government investigate existing mechanisms for exemptions that could be adapted to assess e-mobility devices that do not fully meet the EN 15194 standards but meet key safety criteria, such as e-trikes and other adaptive devices that meet the 25km/h speed limit and 250 watt power limit.
- That the Queensland Government establish an assurance scheme with regulatory controls and Department of Transport and Main Roads oversight to provide a state-wide mechanism to certify and label currently compliant e-bikes; and that the Bill be amended accordingly.
- That the Bill be amended so that individuals who cannot obtain a driver licence because of disability, a medical condition, or age, but are still capable of safely riding an e-mobility device, are able to do so, and that the Department of Transport and Main Roads develop an exemption framework to verify that an individual can safely operate an e-mobility device.
- That the Bill be amended to apply a 10km/h speed limit to all footpaths in high pedestrian areas (with a clear definition to be specified), with the department to consider a 10km/h limit within 10 metres of a pedestrian on all other footpaths; and to provide that the 10km/h limit does not apply to shared paths unless signed, with riders to travel slowly around pedestrians and the department to consider a 15km/h limit within 10 metres of a pedestrian on shared paths.
- That the Department of Transport and Main Roads further investigate a mechanism where designated and controlled public access areas may be used safely by compliant e-mobility devices, with minimal restrictions.
- That the Queensland Government, through the Department of Transport and Main Roads, provide guidance material to shared e-mobility providers and other e-mobility hire companies to assist them to meet their obligations under the legislation.
- That the Department of Transport and Main Roads undertake a review of the regulatory changes implemented by the Bill 12 months from the commencement of the provisions.
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 24, 58th Parliament—Sunshine Coast Waterways Authority Bill 20262026-04-17
Committee findings
The State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee examined the bill, which establishes the Sunshine Coast Waterways Authority to plan for and manage waterways from Pumicestone Passage to the Noosa lakes. The committee considered 95 submissions, a departmental briefing, and a public hearing in Caloundra, finding broad stakeholder support for the new authority and its objectives. While submitters raised concerns about the authority's jurisdiction, board composition, embedding environmental outcomes in the legislation, and local and First Nations consultation, the committee concluded the bill was compatible with the Legislative Standards Act 1992 and the Human Rights Act 2019 and recommended it be passed. No dissenting report or statement of reservation was filed.
- There was broad stakeholder support for establishing the Sunshine Coast Waterways Authority, particularly to improve coordination across a complex regulatory environment and strengthen long-term planning.
- Stakeholders sought clarification of the authority's jurisdiction and how it would coordinate responsibilities with related entities such as Maritime Safety Queensland and local governments.
- Submitters argued the authority's board should be skills-based and independent, with several calling for representation for local government, the Noosa community, waterways users, the Kabi Kabi peoples, and the University of the Sunshine Coast.
- Environmental groups called for binding environmental outcomes and a clear definition of 'sustainable use' to be embedded in the bill, noting the term is undefined and carried over from the Gold Coast Waterways Authority Act.
- First Nations participants, including the Kabi Kabi Peoples Aboriginal Corporation, emphasised the importance of being involved through board representation, an advisory group, and required consultation on the waterways management strategy.
- The Government has allocated $35.6 million over the authority's first three years for establishment and core operations, with some submitters questioning whether this would be adequate and seeking detail on the long-term funding model.
- The committee found the bill compatible with the Legislative Standards Act 1992 and the Human Rights Act 2019.
- The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 13, 58th Parliament—Major Sports Facilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, government response2026-02-12
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 13, 58th Parliament—Major Sports Facilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, interim government response2026-01-16
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 13, 58th Parliament—Major Sports Facilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20252025-10-17
Committee findings
The State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed, along with two additional recommendations. The bill's objectives were largely supported by stakeholders. The committee recommended that the Department consult with the City of Gold Coast on regulatory conditions for special events at Carrara and Robina stadiums, and that the Department monitor the effectiveness of increased ticket scalping penalties. The Queensland Government accepted both additional recommendations.
- The bill's objectives were largely supported by stakeholders, with key issues raised about the regulatory framework for special events at Gold Coast major sports facilities
- Stakeholders raised concerns about arrangements to mitigate impacts of special events on local residents, including noise and extended operating hours beyond 10pm
- The Ticketbrokers Association of Australia raised concerns about ticket resale regulation, seeking a balance between consumer protection and supporting legitimate operators
- Maximum penalties for ticket scalping offences would increase almost sevenfold for individuals, from 20 penalty units to 135 penalty units ($22,531.50)
- The Queensland Government confirmed it would consult with the City of Gold Coast and key stakeholders as part of the Major Sports Facilities Regulation sunset review due by 1 September 2026
- The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
- The committee recommends that the Department of Sport, Racing and Olympic and Paralympic Games consult with the City of Gold Coast and other key stakeholders on any future amendments to the Major Sports Facilities Regulation 2014 relating to the operation of special events at Carrara Stadium and Robina Stadium.
- The committee recommends that the Department of Sport, Racing and Olympic and Paralympic Games monitor the effectiveness of increased penalty provisions, including any enforcement or compliance challenges, to ensure that the amendments achieve their desired outcomes and remain fit for purpose.
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 19, 58th Parliament—Electrical Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20252025-12-19
Committee findings
The State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee examined the Electrical Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 and recommended it be passed. The bill covers two main areas: amendments to the Electrical Safety Act 2002 to formalise the power for electricity entities to issue equipment defect notices, and the proposed repeal of uncommenced section 155A of the Work Health and Safety Act. Stakeholders were divided on the repeal of section 155A, with some supporting its removal and others arguing it should be amended rather than repealed.
- All submissions regarding the Electrical Safety Act amendments supported the proposed changes
- Stakeholders were divided on the proposal to repeal uncommenced section 155A of the Work Health and Safety Act
- Some stakeholders proposed amending rather than repealing section 155A to provide safeguards and reduce anticipated administrative workload
- The bill formalises the longstanding practice since 2002 of electricity entities issuing equipment defect notices, which lacked a specific head of power
- The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 12, 58th Parliament—Heavy Vehicle National Law Amendment Bill 20252025-10-17
Committee findings
The State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee examined the Heavy Vehicle National Law Amendment Bill 2025, which modernises the national law governing heavy vehicle operations and must be enacted in Queensland first as the host jurisdiction. The committee held a public briefing and public hearings in Brisbane and Cairns and received 11 submissions, finding general stakeholder support for the reforms, particularly the simpler safety accreditation scheme and reduced penalties for administrative offences. While encouraging better education for drivers and operators and ongoing monitoring of how the new 'fit to drive' duty works in practice, the committee concluded the Bill is compatible with the Legislative Standards Act 1992 and the Human Rights Act 2019 and recommended it be passed. No dissenting reports or statements of reservation were filed.
- The Bill implements recommendations from the National Transport Commission, endorsed by transport ministers across Australian jurisdictions, following a multi-year review of the Heavy Vehicle National Law.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the reforms, especially the simpler accreditation framework with an option for alternative compliance accreditation and the reduction of penalties for some administrative offences.
- Submitters and witnesses called for targeted education and practical guidance to help drivers and operators understand and comply with the new requirements, including transitioning from the previous fatigue management accreditation scheme.
- Industry representatives in Cairns raised the unique challenges facing drivers in regional and North Queensland and argued for a flexible, common-sense approach to keep businesses viable and supply chains supported.
- The committee acknowledged stakeholder concerns about how the new duty to be 'fit to drive' would be measured and interpreted, and encouraged the Minister and the Regulator to monitor its implementation.
- The committee found the Bill compatible with the Legislative Standards Act 1992 and the Human Rights Act 2019, considering any limits on freedom of movement and property justified by the goal of road safety.
- The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 10, 58th Parliament—Queensland Building and Construction Commission and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 20252025-08-15
Committee findings
The State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee examined the bill over two months, receiving 10 submissions and holding public briefings and a public hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding the digital licensing reforms appropriate and the streamlined safety reporting arrangements fit for purpose. Labor Opposition members filed a statement of reservation cautioning against replacing the legislated dual notification requirement for serious safety incidents with an administrative Memorandum of Understanding.
- Stakeholders broadly supported the QBCC digitisation reforms, including digital licensing via the Queensland Digital Licence app, but sought assurance that physical licence cards and traditional communication methods would be retained.
- The department confirmed that digital licensing would be optional and that licensees could continue to use physical licences and communicate by post or in person at regional service centres.
- Mr Michael Garrels, whose son Jason died in a 2012 workplace incident that prompted the original dual notification laws, raised concerns that removing the dual reporting requirement could weaken existing legislative safeguards.
- The department assured the committee that the amendments only simplify the reporting pathway without changing the intent or outcomes of existing safety policy, and that the Minister committed to reviewing the effectiveness of the changes within two years.
- The committee found the bill compatible with the Legislative Standards Act 1992 and the Human Rights Act 2019, and was satisfied that the increased penalty for non-reporting (from 80 to 100 penalty units) was proportionate.
- The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 8, 58th Parliament—Planning (Social Impact and Community Benefit) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025 - Replaces Tabled Paper 5825T6712025-06-24
Committee findings
The State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee examined the bill over seven weeks, receiving over 700 submissions and conducting four public hearings in Brisbane, Rockhampton and Biloela. The committee recommended the bill be passed, finding broad support for introducing a community benefit system for large-scale renewable energy projects, though stakeholders raised concerns about practical implementation. The committee also accepted the bill's streamlined planning pathway for Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games infrastructure and changes to Economic Development Queensland governance, though several of these positions were not unanimous.
- There was broad stakeholder support for a community benefit system requiring social impact assessments and community benefit agreements for wind farms and large-scale solar farms, though concerns were raised about practical implementation, timing and mandatory requirements.
- Local governments called for dedicated state-funded guidance, tools and resources to support their new role in assessing social impact assessments and negotiating community benefit agreements with developers.
- The renewable energy industry, legal stakeholders and the Queensland Labor Opposition raised concerns that the bill was introduced without a Regulatory Impact Statement, adequate consultation, or alignment with the existing Draft Renewables Regulatory Framework.
- The bill's Olympic infrastructure provisions drew significant opposition regarding the removal of environmental, planning and heritage assessment requirements, restrictions on legal proceedings, and the impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage.
- The committee considered that Battery Energy Storage Systems and solar farm generation thresholds should be further considered in the finalisation of the draft Planning Regulation.
- The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 6, 58th Parliament—Queensland Academy of Sport Bill 2025, government response2025-05-01
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 6, 58th Parliament—Queensland Academy of Sport Bill 20252025-04-11
Committee findings
The State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed with an amendment. The bill establishes the Queensland Academy of Sport as an independent statutory body, replacing its current status as a unit within a government department. The committee recommended that the board be required to include members with qualifications, skills or competencies in both Olympic and Paralympic sport, and the government supported this recommendation with a minor modification.
- Stakeholders broadly supported converting the QAS from a departmental unit to a statutory body to improve operational agility and competitiveness
- Current departmental constraints affect the QAS's ability to adopt emerging technologies, procure specialised products, and engage with commercial partners
- Key concerns focused on board composition, development pathways for athletes with disability, and support for regional athletes and coaches
- Researchers raised concerns about alignment with the Child Safe Organisation Act 2024 given the QAS targets programs for children
- The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
- The committee recommends that the Bill be amended to require that Board members collectively have qualifications, skills or competencies in both Olympic and Paralympic sport.
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 1, 58th Parliament—Revenue Legislation Amendment Bill 2024, government response2025-02-18
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 1, 58th Parliament—Revenue Legislation Amendment Bill 20242025-02-07
Committee findings
The Governance, Energy and Finance Committee examined the bill and made four recommendations, including that it be passed. The bill amends revenue legislation to provide a payroll tax exemption for general practitioner services delivered by contracted GPs in medical practices, and introduces a transfer duty exemption for homeowners who rent out a room to address housing supply. The government supported all committee recommendations.
- The bill provides a payroll tax exemption for GP services delivered by contracted GPs in medical practices, addressing concerns raised by the medical profession about the impact of payroll tax on bulk billing rates
- The bill introduces a transfer duty exemption for homeowners who rent out a room in their home, aiming to increase housing supply
- The committee recommended clear communication and education strategies to ensure homeowners understand their legal rights when renting out rooms
- The committee recommended updated guidance from the Queensland Revenue Office on payroll tax exemptions applicable to certain non-GP specialists and the retrospective amnesty arrangements
- The committee recommends that the Revenue Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 be passed.
- The committee recommends that an appropriate communication and education strategy accompany implementation of the amendments to the Duties Act 2001.
- The committee recommends that clear and updated guidance be issued by the Queensland Revenue Office regarding existing payroll tax exemptions applicable to certain non-GP specialists.
- The committee recommends that clear and updated guidance be issued regarding the application of the retrospective amnesty arrangements.
Inquiries (12)
Other Reports (21)
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 28, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 11 February 2026 and 24 March 2026
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 27, 58th Parliament—Consideration of Auditor-General Report 14: 2024-25—Managing Minjerribah futures funding
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 25, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 10 December 2025 and 10 February 2026
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 23, 58th Parliament—Consideration of Auditor-General Report 9: 2024-25—Major projects 2024
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 22, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 19 November 2025 and 9 December 2025
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No.21—Inquiry into e-mobility safety and use in Queensland, government response
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 21, 58th Parliament— Inquiry into e-mobility safety and use in Queensland
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 20, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 17 September 2025 and 18 November 2025
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 18, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 27 August 2025 and 16 September 2025
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 17, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled on 26 August 2025
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 16, 58th Parliament—Annual Report 2024-25
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 15, 58th Parliament—Consideration of Auditor-General Report 5: 2024-25—Preparing for the Brisbane Games
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 14, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 25 June 2025 and 26 August 2025
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 11, 58th Parliament—2025-26 Budget Estimates—Volume of Additional Information
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 11, 58th Parliament—2025-26 Budget Estimates
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 9, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 13 March 2025 and 24 June 2025
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 7, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 19 February 2025 and 12 March 2025
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 5, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 7 December 2024 and 18 February 2025
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 4, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 11 September 2024 and 6 December 2024
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 2, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled on 10 September 2024—Transport Operations (Marine Safety) Legislation Amendment Regulation 2024
State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee: Report No. 3, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled on 10 September 2024