Health, Environment and Innovation Committee

Portfolio Committee

View on parliament.qld.gov.au

Members (5)

Bills Reviewed (10)

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 21, 58th Parliament—Environmental Protection (Efficiency and Streamlining) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025

2026-01-30
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The committee's review focused on proposals to introduce General Environmental Duty (GED) Codes, streamline environmental approvals for environmentally relevant activities, and strengthen notification and restoration duties under the Environmental Protection Act 1994. The bill aims to provide clearer guidance on how individuals and corporations can achieve compliance with their general environmental duty.

Key findings
  • The bill proposes introducing GED Codes to outline how people and corporations can achieve compliance with the General Environmental Duty
  • The Environmental Protection Act 1994 places core duties on all persons in Queensland, including the duty to prevent or minimise environmental harm
  • The bill addresses duties to notify environmental harm and to restore the environment after incidents causing unlawful harm
  • The Minister is already empowered to make codes of practice under the EP Act, and the bill builds on this framework
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025Did not recommend passage2nd reading failed

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 9, 58th Parliament—Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025, government response

2025-12-09
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined the Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025 over several months, receiving over 100 submissions and holding public hearings in Brisbane and Cairns. The committee recommended that the bill not be passed, finding that the bill's premise of increasing crocodile populations and attacks was not well supported by evidence, and that culling was not an effective safety measure. The committee instead made seven additional recommendations to strengthen existing crocodile management, including expanding automatic removal zones, improving public reporting, and increasing community education. The Queensland Government supported all eight of the committee's recommendations.

Key findings
  • The committee found that the bill's central premise -- that crocodile populations and attacks are increasing -- was not adequately supported by evidence.
  • Expert witnesses told the committee that culling has not been used anywhere in the world as a management option to improve safety, and that eliminating all crocodiles would be necessary to guarantee safe waterways.
  • Stakeholder submissions overwhelmingly opposed unmitigated culling of crocodiles, with many emphasising that human behaviour and complacency are the primary drivers of human-crocodile conflict.
  • The committee found the bill's definition of 'crocodile' to be problematic, being simultaneously too narrow (excluding freshwater crocodiles) and too broad (permitting removal of all crocodiles in an area regardless of individual behaviour).
  • The Member for Hill had consulted only seven stakeholders in the development of the bill and its previous iterations since 2017, which the committee considered insufficient.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill not be passed.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI expand 'Zone F' (atypical habitat with automatic removal) in the Mareeba Shire and engage with Mareeba Shire Council to determine appropriate boundaries.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI include real-time reporting data of crocodile sightings and removals on the QWildlife application, with support from the Department of Customer Services, Open Data and Small Business in developing an improved interface.
  • The committee recommends that permanent educational signage be placed at boat ramps in North Queensland, with specific instructions for visitors relating to avoiding human-crocodile conflict around the water.
  • The committee recommends that permanent educational signage be placed at locations with high tourist activity, like the Airlie Beach Marina and Palm Cove, and areas with consistent, verified sightings, like Lake Placid and Babinda.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI develop a marketing campaign to be deployed in Croc Country to ensure that all persons living in, or arriving to, the area are aware of the risks posed by crocodiles.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI produce educational materials in traditional languages used in Far North Queensland, as well as the most common languages amongst tourist populations.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI develop a more fulsome engagement process with Indigenous communities to ensure that the Queensland Crocodile Management Plan operates in tandem with traditional knowledge, without compromising the timeliness of removals.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 19, 58th Parliament—Health Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 3) 2025

2025-11-28
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The committee's review focused on proposals to introduce General Environmental Duty (GED) Codes, streamline environmental approvals for environmentally relevant activities, and strengthen notification and restoration duties under the Environmental Protection Act 1994. The bill aims to provide clearer guidance on how individuals and corporations can achieve compliance with their general environmental duty.

Key findings
  • The bill proposes introducing GED Codes to outline how people and corporations can achieve compliance with the General Environmental Duty
  • The Environmental Protection Act 1994 places core duties on all persons in Queensland, including the duty to prevent or minimise environmental harm
  • The bill addresses duties to notify environmental harm and to restore the environment after incidents causing unlawful harm
  • The Minister is already empowered to make codes of practice under the EP Act, and the bill builds on this framework
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 16, 58th Parliament—Tobacco and Other Smoking Products (Dismantling Illegal Trade) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025

2025-11-07
Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025Did not recommend passage2nd reading failed

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 9, 58th Parliament—Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025, interim government response

2025-10-29
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined the Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025 over several months, receiving over 100 submissions and holding public hearings in Brisbane and Cairns. The committee recommended that the bill not be passed, finding that the bill's premise of increasing crocodile populations and attacks was not well supported by evidence, and that culling was not an effective safety measure. The committee instead made seven additional recommendations to strengthen existing crocodile management, including expanding automatic removal zones, improving public reporting, and increasing community education. The Queensland Government supported all eight of the committee's recommendations.

Key findings
  • The committee found that the bill's central premise -- that crocodile populations and attacks are increasing -- was not adequately supported by evidence.
  • Expert witnesses told the committee that culling has not been used anywhere in the world as a management option to improve safety, and that eliminating all crocodiles would be necessary to guarantee safe waterways.
  • Stakeholder submissions overwhelmingly opposed unmitigated culling of crocodiles, with many emphasising that human behaviour and complacency are the primary drivers of human-crocodile conflict.
  • The committee found the bill's definition of 'crocodile' to be problematic, being simultaneously too narrow (excluding freshwater crocodiles) and too broad (permitting removal of all crocodiles in an area regardless of individual behaviour).
  • The Member for Hill had consulted only seven stakeholders in the development of the bill and its previous iterations since 2017, which the committee considered insufficient.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill not be passed.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI expand 'Zone F' (atypical habitat with automatic removal) in the Mareeba Shire and engage with Mareeba Shire Council to determine appropriate boundaries.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI include real-time reporting data of crocodile sightings and removals on the QWildlife application, with support from the Department of Customer Services, Open Data and Small Business in developing an improved interface.
  • The committee recommends that permanent educational signage be placed at boat ramps in North Queensland, with specific instructions for visitors relating to avoiding human-crocodile conflict around the water.
  • The committee recommends that permanent educational signage be placed at locations with high tourist activity, like the Airlie Beach Marina and Palm Cove, and areas with consistent, verified sightings, like Lake Placid and Babinda.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI develop a marketing campaign to be deployed in Croc Country to ensure that all persons living in, or arriving to, the area are aware of the risks posed by crocodiles.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI produce educational materials in traditional languages used in Far North Queensland, as well as the most common languages amongst tourist populations.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI develop a more fulsome engagement process with Indigenous communities to ensure that the Queensland Crocodile Management Plan operates in tandem with traditional knowledge, without compromising the timeliness of removals.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025Did not recommend passage2nd reading failed

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 9, 58th Parliament—Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025

2025-07-25
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined the Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025 over several months, receiving over 100 submissions and holding public hearings in Brisbane and Cairns. The committee recommended that the bill not be passed, finding that the bill's premise of increasing crocodile populations and attacks was not well supported by evidence, and that culling was not an effective safety measure. The committee instead made seven additional recommendations to strengthen existing crocodile management, including expanding automatic removal zones, improving public reporting, and increasing community education. The Queensland Government supported all eight of the committee's recommendations.

Key findings
  • The committee found that the bill's central premise -- that crocodile populations and attacks are increasing -- was not adequately supported by evidence.
  • Expert witnesses told the committee that culling has not been used anywhere in the world as a management option to improve safety, and that eliminating all crocodiles would be necessary to guarantee safe waterways.
  • Stakeholder submissions overwhelmingly opposed unmitigated culling of crocodiles, with many emphasising that human behaviour and complacency are the primary drivers of human-crocodile conflict.
  • The committee found the bill's definition of 'crocodile' to be problematic, being simultaneously too narrow (excluding freshwater crocodiles) and too broad (permitting removal of all crocodiles in an area regardless of individual behaviour).
  • The Member for Hill had consulted only seven stakeholders in the development of the bill and its previous iterations since 2017, which the committee considered insufficient.
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill not be passed.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI expand 'Zone F' (atypical habitat with automatic removal) in the Mareeba Shire and engage with Mareeba Shire Council to determine appropriate boundaries.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI include real-time reporting data of crocodile sightings and removals on the QWildlife application, with support from the Department of Customer Services, Open Data and Small Business in developing an improved interface.
  • The committee recommends that permanent educational signage be placed at boat ramps in North Queensland, with specific instructions for visitors relating to avoiding human-crocodile conflict around the water.
  • The committee recommends that permanent educational signage be placed at locations with high tourist activity, like the Airlie Beach Marina and Palm Cove, and areas with consistent, verified sightings, like Lake Placid and Babinda.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI develop a marketing campaign to be deployed in Croc Country to ensure that all persons living in, or arriving to, the area are aware of the risks posed by crocodiles.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI produce educational materials in traditional languages used in Far North Queensland, as well as the most common languages amongst tourist populations.
  • The committee recommends that DETSI develop a more fulsome engagement process with Indigenous communities to ensure that the Queensland Crocodile Management Plan operates in tandem with traditional knowledge, without compromising the timeliness of removals.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 8, 58th Parliament—Health Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025

2025-07-11
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined two bills referred together: the Queensland Institute of Medical Research Bill 2025 and the Health Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025. The committee recommended both be passed. The QIMR Bill modernises the governance of the Queensland Institute of Medical Research, adding commercialisation as a statutory function and allowing non-employees to receive incentive payments for intellectual property contributions. The Health Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 2) clarifies pharmacy business ownership regulations, transitions the state dust lung disease register to a national registry, and enables mosquito trapping to detect Japanese encephalitis virus.

Key findings
  • The QIMR Bill adds commercialisation of intellectual property as a statutory function and allows incentive payments to non-employees who contribute to intellectual property development
  • The Health Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 2) addresses implementation issues in the Pharmacy Business Ownership Act 2024, closing a loophole allowing non-pharmacists to hold beneficial interests in pharmacy businesses through trusts
  • The bill transitions the Queensland Notifiable Dust Lung Disease Register to the National Occupational Respiratory Disease Registry, removing duplicative reporting obligations for medical practitioners
  • The committee found both bills compatible with human rights and consistent with fundamental legislative principles
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 5, 58th Parliament—Nature Conservation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025

2025-05-02
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined the bill and recommended it be passed. The bill amends the Environmental Protection Act 1994 to establish contemporary enabling provisions for the automatic issuing of low-risk environmental authorities through electronic systems, and retrospectively validates authorities previously issued automatically. The Queensland Conservation Council raised concerns about reduced transparency in environmental authority conditions.

Key findings
  • A key objective is ensuring low-risk environmental authorities can continue to be issued automatically through electronic systems in a way that satisfies administrative law principles
  • The bill retrospectively establishes the validity of authorities previously issued automatically under the Environmental Protection Act
  • The Queensland Conservation Council raised concerns that the changes reduce transparency by replacing explicit conditions in environmental authorities with deemed compliance provisions
  • The department responded that the restructured provisions ensure consistency with other deemed condition provisions in the Act
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Health Legislation Amendment Bill 2025Recommended passagePASSED with amendment

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 4, 58th Parliament—Health Legislation Amendment Bill 2025

2025-05-02
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined the bill, receiving 12 submissions and holding a public hearing. The committee recommended the bill be passed. The bill requires at least one member of each Hospital and Health Board to be a clinician employed by the relevant Hospital and Health Service, and amends the Tobacco and Other Smoking Products Act to allow expedited forfeiture and destruction of seized vaping goods and cost recovery from convicted offenders. Labor and Greens members filed a statement of reservation raising concerns about conflicts of interest and vaping waste disposal.

Key findings
  • Stakeholders strongly supported requiring a frontline clinician on each Hospital and Health Board to ensure decisions are informed by direct patient care experience
  • The Queensland Integrity Commissioner advised that conflicts of interest from appointing HHS employees to their own board could be complex to manage but existing statutory disclosure requirements are adequate
  • Since October 2024, Queensland Health has seized over 150,000 illicit vapes worth more than $5 million, creating unsustainable storage challenges due to fire hazards and hazardous materials
  • The committee carefully analysed the removal of the show cause process for vaping goods forfeiture, finding it justified given the safety risks and the ease of identifying illicit vaping products
  • Submitters raised concerns about the classification of vaping products as pharmaceutical waste and the lack of a safe disposal pathway in Queensland
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
Dissenting views: Labor deputy chair Joe Kelly and Greens member Barbara O'Shea filed a statement of reservation. They questioned whether appointing clinicians from within the same HHS was the best approach, noting the Integrity Commissioner's advice that less complex alternatives could achieve the same ends. They called for a review clause to be added to the bill. They also raised concerns about inadequate disposal infrastructure for vaping products, noting an estimated 12,000 fires from incorrectly disposed batteries and calling for consultation between Queensland Health and the environment department on proper waste classification.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 1, 58th Parliament–Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024, government response

2025-04-02
Committee findings

The Health, Environment and Innovation Committee examined the bill and made four recommendations, including that it be passed with amendments. The bill amends the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law to require permanent publication of a practitioner's regulatory history where a tribunal found professional misconduct based on sexual misconduct. The committee recommended clarification of the legislative threshold for sexual misconduct and that the decision to publish be appellable. The government supported some recommendations and not others.

Key findings
  • The bill requires National Boards to permanently publish additional information about a practitioner's regulatory history where a tribunal found professional misconduct based on sexual misconduct
  • National Boards are given discretion to infer that a tribunal's finding of professional misconduct was based on sexual misconduct where the decision does not expressly state this
  • The government did not support making the publication decision an appellable decision under the National Law, arguing it would be inappropriate as Boards do not reconsider facts
  • The government supported further stakeholder consultation on operationalising the requirements and committed to at least 12 months between passage and commencement
Recommendations
  • The committee recommends the Bill be passed.
  • The committee recommends that the explanatory notes and/or clause 21 of the Bill be amended to clarify any requisite legislative threshold for sexual misconduct.
  • The committee recommends that Clause 21 of the Bill be amended to provide that a decision to publish a health practitioner's regulatory history, based on an inference by National Boards, is an appellable decision under Part 8 Division 13 of the National Law.
  • The committee recommends that, during implementation, the Australian Health Ministers Meeting consults further with relevant stakeholders around operationalising any legislative threshold of sexual misconduct, and the National Boards' discretion to infer.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors

Inquiries (1)

Other Reports (16)

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 20, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 14 October 2025 and 18 November 2025

Subordinate Legislation2026-01-23

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 14, 58th Parliament—Improving Queensland’s Container Refund Scheme: Erratum

Other2026-01-20

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 14, 58th Parliament—Improving Queensland’s Container Refund Scheme, interim government response

Other2026-01-09

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 18, 58th Parliament—Annual Report 2024-25

Other2025-11-14

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 17, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 26 August 2025 and 16 September 2025

Subordinate Legislation2025-11-14

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 15, 58th Parliament—Consideration of Auditor-General Report 12: 2022-23—Growing Ecotourism in Queensland

audit2025-10-31

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 14, 58th Parliament—Improving Queensland’s Container Refund Scheme

Other2025-10-16

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 13, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 10 June 2025 and 28 July 2025

Subordinate Legislation2025-09-05

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 12, 58th Parliament—2025-26 Budget Estimates—Volume of Additional Information

Other2025-08-15

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 12, 58th Parliament—2025-26 Budget Estimates

Other2025-08-15

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 11, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled on 20 May 2025

Subordinate Legislation2025-07-25

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 10, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled on 29 April 2025

Subordinate Legislation2025-07-25

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 7, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled on 1 April 2025

Subordinate Legislation2025-06-16

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 6, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled on 12 March 2025

Subordinate Legislation2025-05-26

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 3, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled on 28 November 2024

Subordinate Legislation2025-03-18

Health, Environment and Innovation Committee: Report No. 2, 58th Parliament—Subordinate legislation tabled between 10 September 2024 and 27 November 2024

Subordinate Legislation2025-02-24