Planning and Development (Planning for Prosperity) Bill 2015

Introduced: 4/6/2015By: Mr T Nicholls MPStatus: Discharged
This summary was generated by AI and has not yet been reviewed by a human.

Plain English Summary

Overview

This bill was a complete rewrite of Queensland's planning laws, aimed at replacing the 700-page Sustainable Planning Act 2009 with a simpler, faster system. It simplified development categories, cut State planning instruments from four to two, increased maximum fines for illegal development to over $500,000, and gave councils new powers over party houses. The bill was introduced by the Newman LNP government shortly before the 2015 election and did not pass; Queensland's planning system was instead replaced by the Labor government's Planning Act 2016.

Who it affects

Anyone who builds, renovates, subdivides, or changes the use of land in Queensland; councils, neighbours who might object to new development, and existing industrial businesses near growing suburbs.

Key changes

  • Replaced the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 with a new streamlined Planning Act aimed at faster, simpler council approvals
  • Replaced 'code' and 'impact' assessment with 'standard' and 'merit' assessment, and unlinked public notification from assessment category
  • Increased maximum fines for carrying out prohibited or illegal development from 1,665 to 4,500 penalty units (about $512,000), and up to 17,000 penalty units for breaches on heritage places
  • Let existing industrial uses like breweries register for 10-year protection from nuisance complaints by new nearby residents, with councils required to flag affected properties on title
  • Empowered councils to regulate 'party houses' as a distinct land use and declare restriction areas where short-term party rentals are automatically unlawful
  • Preserved appeal rights to the Planning and Environment Court and continued Development Tribunals with no legal representation allowed
  • Gave the Minister call-in and direction powers over State-interest matters, with no right of appeal against Ministerial decisions

Bill Story

The journey of this bill through Parliament, including debate and recorded votes.

Introduced4 June 2015View Hansard
First Reading4 June 2015View Hansard
Committee4 June 2015View Hansard

Referred to Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources Committee

Committee Findings
Did not recommend passage

The Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources Committee examined this private member's bill alongside the government's Planning Bill 2015 and related bills in a cognate inquiry. The committee majority recommended this bill not be passed, instead supporting the government's competing planning reform bills. The committee made 11 recommendations in total, with recommendations 7-11 relating to specific improvements to the government's Planning Bill 2015 covering heritage protections, exemption certificate transparency, chosen assessment managers, notification requirements, and infrastructure charging for non-state schools.

Key findings (5)
  • The committee majority recommended the private member's bill not be passed, preferring the government's competing Planning Bill 2015
  • Six bills were examined in a cognate inquiry covering both the government's planning reform package and the opposition's alternative suite of bills
  • Stakeholders provided diverse views on the simplification of development categories from five to three, with some councils arguing costs would outweigh benefits
  • The committee found the government's bill better addressed transparency and accountability in planning decision-making
  • The Local Government Association of Queensland and other stakeholders raised concerns about the resourcing burden of transitioning to the new planning framework
Recommendations (6)
  • The majority of the committee recommends the Planning and Development (Planning for Prosperity) Bill 2015 not be passed.
  • The committee recommends section 68 and section 70 of the Queensland Heritage Act 1992 be retained so the role of the Queensland Heritage Council with respect to decisions about the demolition or substantial demolition of a State heritage place be in primary legislation.
  • The committee recommends the Deputy Premier require local governments and the chief executive to publish details about exemption certificates they give.
  • The committee recommends the Deputy Premier address the issues raised by submitters regarding chosen assessment managers, particularly transparency and liability for decision-making.
  • The committee recommends the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning continue to consult with local governments regarding the notification requirements in clause 63.
  • The committee recommends that infrastructure charging for both state and non-state schools should be consistent and equitable and both be exempt from paying infrastructure charges where development is undertaken through Ministerial designation.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Committee Report8 Apr 2016

Committee report tabled

Second Reading
7.57 pmMr WALKERSupports

Moved the LNP's private member's planning bills, which had been introduced to restart the reform process that lapsed when the 54th Parliament was dissolved.

The fact that we are debating these bills is directly attributable to the work of the LNP government and particularly the member for Callide.2016-05-11View Hansard

Referenced Entities

Legislation

Organisations

Programs & Schemes

Places

Roles & Offices

Sectors Affected

Classified using AGIFT/ANZSIC Australian government standards