Brisbane Casino Agreement Amendment Bill 2016
Plain English Summary
Overview
This bill replaces the 1992 Brisbane Casino Agreement with a new agreement between the State and the casino operator. The main change is that future redevelopment of the Brisbane casino-hotel site will be assessed under state planning law as part of the Queen's Wharf Brisbane project, rather than being exempt from development and heritage laws as it has been since 1992.
Who it affects
The immediate party affected is The Star Entertainment Group (the casino lessee), but the bill also shapes how the Queen's Wharf precinct in central Brisbane can be redeveloped. It has no direct effect on casino customers or gambling rules.
Key changes
- Ends the original 1992 Brisbane Casino Agreement and ratifies a new replacement agreement attached to the Act
- Removes the casino site's blanket exemption from Brisbane's development and heritage legislation
- Puts future redevelopment of the site under the Minister for Economic Development Queensland, linked to the Queen's Wharf Priority Development Area
- Allows the new agreement to be amended later by further agreements ratified by Parliament, with a consolidated version to be published online
- Lets applications already lodged under the old agreement be decided under the old rules
Bill Story
The journey of this bill through Parliament, including debate and recorded votes.
▸Committee23 Feb 2016View Hansard
Referred to Legal Affairs and Community Safety Committee
The Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources Committee examined the Brisbane Casino Agreement Amendment Bill 2016, which replaces the existing Brisbane Casino Agreement to enable the Queens Wharf Brisbane development. The committee recommended the bill be passed after being satisfied that appropriate heritage protections were in place for historic buildings including the Treasury Building and Land Administration Building. The committee received two submissions and held a public briefing with three government departments.
Key findings (5)
- The bill replaces the 1992 Brisbane Casino Agreement with a new agreement to accommodate the Queens Wharf Brisbane integrated resort development
- The key change removes the exemption of the casino-hotel complex from development and heritage legislation, bringing it under the Economic Development Act 2012
- The committee was satisfied that heritage protections for significant buildings including the Treasury Building and Land Administration Building would be preserved under the new development scheme
- The Destination Brisbane Consortium supported the bill as integral to the Queens Wharf Brisbane project
- No issues of fundamental legislative principle were identified
Recommendations (1)
- The committee recommends that the Brisbane Casino Agreement Amendment Bill 2016 be passed.
Committee report tabled
▸Second Reading19 Apr 2016View Hansard
Vote on a motion
The motion was agreed to.
A formal vote on whether to accept a proposal — this could be the bill itself, an amendment, or another motion.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (44)
Noes (42)
▸18 members spoke18 support
As Attorney-General, moved the second reading of both cognated bills, outlining the legislative framework to support the $3 billion Queen's Wharf integrated resort development including casino agreement ratification, PDA-associated development provisions, and heritage protections.
“This project will transform the Queen's Wharf area into a vibrant new-world city development unlike any other offered in our state that will attract visitors and investment to Queensland.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as LNP shadow minister, crediting the former LNP government for initiating the Queen's Wharf project, but criticised Labor for negotiating the theatre out of the development deal in exchange for additional poker machine revenue.
“Under the LNP Brisbane would have had a new theatre provided without the need to resort to taxpayer funds—an extraordinary outcome. The ALP actually negotiated the theatre out of the deal.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as committee chair, describing the Queen's Wharf development as the most exciting project for Brisbane since Expo 88 and noting the committee unanimously recommended passage.
“This is one of the most exciting things that has happened to Brisbane since Expo 88. It will put Brisbane and Queensland on the map.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as committee member, crediting the former LNP government and noting the committee was satisfied with heritage protections and PDA-associated development provisions despite some concerns about ministerial powers.
“In the future the Queen's Wharf redevelopment project will live to be a legacy left behind by the Newman government.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as committee member, noting the strict suitability criteria for casino operators, heritage protections, and the rationale for PDA-associated development provisions to streamline the pedestrian bridge assessment.
“The committee voted unanimously, I believe on both occasions, to support the bill.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills, emphasising the flow-on benefits for outback tourism in his electorate of Gregory as the project would attract international visitors who could then travel to regional Queensland.
“When people see the Brisbane project they will say, 'This is something that I want to see. I enjoy six-star accommodation and I would like the casino. I can also jump on a plane and spend a couple of days in the outback.'”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as Minister for State Development, highlighting the estimated 11,500 flow-on jobs and supply chain opportunities for Queensland producers and regional businesses.
“The Queensland Investment Corporation estimates these jobs to be a staggering 11,500. That is jobs with local suppliers, jobs with food and beverage producers and jobs for tradespeople and other professionals.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as former Deputy Premier who initiated the Queen's Wharf project, detailing the courageous decisions required including embracing integrated resort development, building 1 William Street as a catalyst, and insisting on the pedestrian bridge to South Bank against bureaucratic advice.
“The Queen's Wharf project required a number of very courageous decisions to make happen. It did not just happen without a lot of soul searching on the part of those of us who made those decisions.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as former Treasurer who helped design the project, explaining the decision to follow the Singapore Marina Bay Sands model for integrated resort development rather than the Las Vegas or Macau models.
“This was not about handing out casinos to someone who could not make a cruise ship terminal work on the Gold Coast because they did not have any other idea. This was about driving tourism to the state of Queensland in three distinct areas.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as Minister for Main Roads, praising the world-class urban design that maximises public space, integrates heritage buildings, and connects the development to South Bank via a pedestrian bridge.
“The urban design of this project is absolutely world class and first rate. It has a quality about it that takes the principle of the democratisation of public space very well.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as the local member for Brisbane Central where Queen's Wharf is located, acknowledging both sides of the House contributed to the project and committing to keeping inner-city residents informed about construction impacts.
“Queen's Wharf will put Brisbane on the international map in the biggest way since Expo 88. It will be a transformative project that will change the face of Brisbane forever.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills but criticised the government for moving the Cross River Rail station away from Queen's Wharf to a flood-prone location on Albert Street, arguing this undermined the project's tourism potential.
“The government keeps talking about how wonderful this project will be—it was started by the LNP—and about how it will attract people to Brisbane. What do those opposite want to do? They want to move a train station, which was proposed by the LNP to be next to Queen's Wharf, away and into an area that floods.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills, arguing it was the Palaszczuk government that was delivering the development properly while criticising the LNP's handling of 1 William Street procurement, citing Queensland Audit Office concerns about value for money.
“Not only are we fixing the mess but we are enhancing the investment. We are enhancing the project and making sure that this is a project which is delivered and continues to enhance Brisbane's reputation as a world city.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills, emphasising heritage protection provisions and job creation opportunities for her electorate in construction, tourism, hospitality and retail.
“Thankfully, we now have a sensible government and protections in place which acknowledge these heritage and culturally significant places.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as a once-in-a-lifetime project that would redefine Brisbane, create much-needed jobs and reduce reliance on the mineral resource sector.
“This is a once-in-a-lifetime project that will redefine Brisbane, a project which has been several years in the making and will ultimately cross all political divides.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills, noting the development would be on state-owned land and highlighting the potential for Chinese tourism.
“Unlike those opposite, we are not selling assets. This development will be on state owned land.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills, highlighting Queensland's leading business and consumer confidence figures and the potential for the project to address unemployment.
“When the Palaszczuk government took over after the 2015 election, unemployment was at an 11-year high. Although those figures sound scary, for people who have not had jobs for 18 months to two years, projects such as this one are a sign of what this government is about.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
Supported both bills as Minister for Housing and Public Works, emphasising the 3,000 construction jobs and the importance of strong construction industry policy including action on nonconforming building products.
“Quality construction projects such as this are very important for the Queensland economy, which is why I support this project and the measures in the bills that facilitate its development.”— 2016-04-19View Hansard
▸In Detail19 Apr 2016View Hansard
That the amendment be agreed to
The motion passed.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (45)
Noes (41)
That the motion, as amended, be agreed to
The motion passed.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (45)
Noes (41)
Referenced Entities
Legislation
Places
Roles & Offices
Sectors Affected
Classified using AGIFT/ANZSIC Australian government standards