Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2020

Introduced: 5/2/2020By: Hon M de Brenni MPStatus: PASSED with amendment
This summary was generated by AI and has not yet been reviewed by a human.

Plain English Summary

This is an omnibus bill covering multiple policy areas.

Overview

This bill overhauls Queensland's building industry payment protections by replacing project bank accounts with a new statutory trust system that holds subcontractor money in trust. It also cracks down on fraudulent behaviour in the industry, introduces a demerit point system for building certifiers, strengthens regulation of architects and engineers, and preserves review rights for retirement village transition plans.

Who it affects

Subcontractors gain stronger payment protections through trust accounts. Head contractors face new trust management obligations and reporting requirements. Building certifiers, architects and engineers face tighter regulation and accountability measures. Building owners get better access to inspection information.

Subcontractor payment protections

The bill replaces project bank accounts with a new statutory trust framework. Money owed to subcontractors must be held in project trust accounts, and retention money must be held in separate retention trust accounts. These protections roll out in phases, reaching all building contracts worth $1 million or more by July 2022.

  • Head contractors must hold subcontractor payments in project trust accounts at approved financial institutions
  • Retention money withheld from subcontractors must be held in separate retention trust accounts
  • Subcontractors can request a payment withholding notice on the next party up the chain if an adjudicated amount goes unpaid
  • Head contractors can register a charge over a developer's property for unpaid adjudicated amounts
  • Head contractors must declare with every payment claim whether subcontractors have been paid

Fraud crackdown and QBCC enforcement

Implements recommendations from the Special Joint Taskforce into subcontractor non-payment. The QBCC gets stronger tools to pursue dishonest operators, including new offences, longer prosecution timeframes, and the ability to publish details of excluded individuals involved in company collapses.

  • New offence for providing false or misleading financial information that is passed on to the QBCC
  • QBCC prosecution timeframe extended to 3 years after the offence or 2 years after it comes to the QBCC's knowledge
  • QBCC can publish details of excluded individuals who are not licensees (e.g. company directors involved in collapses)
  • Executive officers personally liable for ensuring their company meets minimum financial requirements

Building certifier accountability

Introduces a demerit point system for building certifiers and strengthens consumer protections. Certifiers who accumulate 30 demerit points within 3 years face licence disqualification. Building owners gain the right to request inspection documents.

  • Demerit point system introduced — 30 points in 3 years leads to licence disqualification (1 year for first, 3 years for subsequent)
  • Certifier's primary duty is clarified as acting in the public interest
  • Building owners can request and receive all inspection documentation from their certifier
  • Record-keeping period for certifiers extended from 5 years to 7 years

Architect and engineer regulation

Gives the Board of Architects and Board of Professional Engineers enhanced investigation and compliance audit powers, bringing them in line with other professional regulators like the QBCC.

  • Boards can conduct compliance audits of practitioners
  • Investigators gain powers to enter premises, search and seize evidence under warrant
  • Boards can impose conditions on registration without requiring the practitioner's agreement
  • Practitioners must notify their Board of changes relevant to their fitness to practise

Retirement village review rights

Preserves the right for people affected by retirement village transition plans to seek review of chief executive decisions through QCAT, replacing a temporary regulation that was about to expire.

  • QCAT review rights for retirement village transition plan decisions made permanent in legislation

Bill Story

The journey of this bill through Parliament, including debate and recorded votes.

Introduced22 Aug 2017View Hansard
First Reading22 Aug 2017View Hansard
Committee22 Aug 2017View Hansard

Referred to Public Works and Utilities Committee

Committee Findings
Recommended passage

The Transport and Public Works Committee examined the bill and tabled Report No. 36 on 20 March 2020. The committee recommended the bill be passed and made 11 additional recommendations for amendments, all of which the Queensland Government accepted. The committee's recommendations focused on clarifying definitions, strengthening trust account protections for subcontractors, closing loopholes around unlicensed building work, and improving fire protection regulation.

Key findings (5)
  • Stakeholders identified ambiguities in key definitions that determine when trust accounts must be established, prompting the committee to recommend a review of all affected definitions.
  • The committee found a loophole allowing residential construction work to be split into multiple small-scale contracts to avoid project trust requirements and recommended anti-avoidance measures.
  • Industry stakeholders raised concerns that not all relevant contractors, including electricians, architects, and engineers, were protected by the retention trust regime.
  • The committee identified that passive fire protection work was incorrectly classified as 'building work' rather than 'fire protection' under the QBCC Act, creating safety and enforcement gaps.
  • The committee recommended a review of the role of property developers in the building and construction industry, including their financial capacity, ethical behaviour, and work practices.
Recommendations (12)
  • The committee recommends the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2020 be passed.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister for Housing and Public Works review all definitions identified by stakeholders as having ambiguities and amend the legislation as appropriate.
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be amended to include measures to prevent the use of multiple contracts on the same or adjacent land in relation to contracts for small scale residential construction work.
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be amended to make it clear which parties are intended to be excluded by the exemption allowed in proposed new section 15E.
  • The committee recommends that the terms used in proposed new section 15F be reviewed to ensure the intent is clearly articulated and amended as considered appropriate.
  • The committee recommends that clause 63 of the Bill (proposed new section 20) be amended to ensure that the account nominated by the subcontractor must be under the control of the subcontractor.
  • The committee recommends that the Bill be amended to ensure that all relevant contractors are protected by the trust regime.
  • The committee recommends that both the need for and location of proposed new section 55B(6) of the Bill be reconsidered and that the Bill be amended accordingly.
  • The committee recommends that section 42 and Schedule 1A(8) of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 be amended to omit the exemption allowing an unlicensed person who enters into a contract to carry out building work.
  • The committee recommends that the QBCC Act be amended to include 'passive fire work' in the definition of 'fire protection'.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister for Housing and Public Works considers undertaking a review of the role of property developers in the building and construction industry.
  • The committee recommends that should the review of property developers be conducted, it be done in consultation with industry stakeholders, with findings reported by 1 July 2021.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors
Committee Report7 Feb 2020

Committee report tabled

Second Reading25 Oct 2017View Hansard
38 members spoke21 support17 mixed
11.45 amMr HARTMixed

Did not oppose the bill but criticised the government for taking eight years from its 2015 election promise to fully implement subcontractor payment protections, arguing the reforms are too slow and calling for a royal commission type investigation into the building industry.

The LNP stands behind a royal commission type investigation into the building industry. That is what we really need to see here because at the end of the day there are issues even on a federal level that need to be dealt with.2020-07-15View Hansard
4.46 pmHon. MC de BRENNISupports

As the responsible minister, moved the second reading and strongly advocated for the bill's trust account reforms to ensure subcontractors are paid on time, highlighting personal stories of tradies affected by non-payment.

For too long the issue of security of payment has been in the too-hard basket, and I think that is beneath us as a state.2020-07-14View Hansard
12.45 pmMr KINGSupports

Supported the bill as landmark Labor reform that will establish project bank accounts to ensure subcontractors are paid in full, on time, every time, describing it as creating fairness in the building industry.

These new laws are landmark Labor reforms, seen nowhere else in the country yet. They will help make sure that subbies are paid in full, on time, every time.2017-10-26View Hansard
7.56 pmHon. MC de BRENNISupports

As the minister introducing the bill, moved the second reading and commended comprehensive reforms including project bank accounts, simplified claims processes, new penalties for non-payment, and action on phoenixing to ensure subcontractors are paid on time and in full.

Fundamentally, the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Bill does two things. Firstly, it sets the country's most comprehensive framework for helping to ensure that people are paid on time, in full, every time. Secondly, it unblocks the grinding gears of small and medium business confidence in the industry in this state.2017-10-25View Hansard
3.46 pmHon. MC de BRENNISupports

As minister introducing the bill, presented the bill to establish project bank accounts for government and private construction projects, strengthen QBCC licensing, and protect subcontractors from non-payment and head contractor insolvency.

The central tenet of this bill is one that I and my colleagues on this side of the House feel very strongly about: if you do the work you should get paid. For far too long subcontractors have suffered an unreasonably high level of risk and burden of financial loss associated with the building and construction industry.2017-08-22View Hansard
11.54 amMr KINGSupports

Spoke as committee chair, noting the committee recommended the bill be passed with 12 recommendations, and emphasised the reforms will ensure workers and subcontractors get paid.

This bill builds on our security of payment laws and will further ensure that workers, including subcontractors, will get paid.2020-07-15View Hansard
5.09 pmMr HARTMixed

Stated the LNP will not oppose the bill, supporting the principle that tradies deserve to be paid, but heavily criticised the government's slow implementation, repeated delays since the 2015 election promise, and last-minute amendments not provided to the opposition.

The LNP's position is firm on the principle that everybody deserves to be paid for the work they do. Unfortunately, late payments and non-payment of Queensland tradies remains an ongoing concern in the building and construction industry.2020-07-14View Hansard
12.55 pmMr MOLHOEKMixed

Confirmed the LNP would not oppose the bill but heavily criticised it as rushed and ill-considered, noting 70 per cent of subcontractors would not be protected and that 143 amendments demonstrated the bill's flaws.

We will not be opposing this bill. I think we have made that very clear ... Seventy per cent of the subcontractors in Queensland are offered absolutely no additional protection under this bill because 70 per cent of the subcontractors in Queensland work on projects under $1 million.2017-10-26View Hansard
8.14 pmMr BENNETTMixed

Expressed conditional support for the bill dependent on the 143 government amendments addressing industry concerns, while defending the LNP's 2014 BCIPA reforms and criticising the government's consultation process. Indicated the LNP would support the bill if the amendments adequately addressed stakeholder concerns.

If these 143 amendments go a long way to supporting all key stakeholders in the industry, the LNP will be happy to support the bill.2017-10-25View Hansard
12.03 pmMr SORENSENMixed

Supported the principle of ensuring subcontractors are paid but criticised the government's previous legislation as weak and insufficient, sharing personal examples of tradies left unpaid in his electorate.

Security of payment reform has been talked about forever and the government must get it right. The government has failed previously with poor legislation that does not protect subbies.2020-07-15View Hansard
3.11 pmMr WHITINGSupports

Strongly supported the bill as the first of its kind in Australia to decisively address security of payments for subcontractors, defending project bank accounts against claims they would raise construction costs.

I am very proud to support this bill today. It is the first of its kind in Australia to take such decisive steps to address security of payments for subcontractors.2017-10-26View Hansard
12.13 pmMr BROWNSupports

Strongly supported the bill, arguing trust in the payment system equals confidence in the economy and citing Deloitte research projecting the reforms would create 2,373 jobs over 20 years.

I support this bill because trust equals confidence, and confidence equals certainty in the economy—certainty for tradies and employers to put on that apprentice and create more jobs.2020-07-15View Hansard
3.18 pmMr McEACHANMixed

Acknowledged the intent of the bill was admirable but criticised the government for rushing legislation without adequately addressing stakeholder concerns, committing the LNP to an implementation panel if elected.

The LNP supports the principle of providing a safety net for subbies to ensure they do get rightly paid the money they are owed. That is why the LNP will not be opposing the bill. We note the failure of the minister to genuinely consult with all parties and stakeholders.2017-10-26View Hansard
12.18 pmMr CRISAFULLIMixed

Supported the principle of fair payment but argued the reforms need to balance protection with reducing red tape and administrative burden on smaller builders and developers, calling for a commission of inquiry.

The greatest gift we can give anyone in any sector but particularly building and construction is certainty—certainty that when they are quoting on a job they are not going to be stomped on by the unions, certainty that when they are quoting on a job they will be paid.2020-07-15View Hansard
3.27 pmMs PEASESupports

Supported the bill's sweeping security of payment reforms, highlighting the project bank account framework and strengthened QBCC regulation of the industry.

Subcontractors should have the confidence that if they do the work they will get paid for the work they do in full, on time, every time. I commend the bill to the House.2017-10-26View Hansard
12.24 pmMr WHITINGSupports

Supported the bill as part of ongoing reform to ensure subcontractors are paid on time and in full, also welcoming retirement village protection amendments.

What we need to see in Queensland is that subbies, contractors, builders and tradies being paid on time, every time and in full.2020-07-15View Hansard
3.34 pmMr POWELLMixed

Indicated LNP support but criticised the bill's original form and the lack of consultation, pointing to 143 amendments as evidence it was wrong initially, and called for an implementation panel before private sector rollout.

It demonstrates that, despite all the rhetoric from those opposite, they clearly got this bill wrong in its original state. Feedback from the likes of Master Builders needed to be taken into consideration to make this bill work.2017-10-26View Hansard
12.31 pmMr PERRETTMixed

Supported the bill but argued the government's earlier legislation was weak and called for a commission of inquiry, highlighting the collapse of Ri-Con Contractors which left hundreds of thousands owed to Gympie businesses.

These businesses are among more than 300 unsecured creditors, including subcontractors, across Gympie and the Sunshine Coast who are owed millions.2020-07-15View Hansard
3.41 pmHon. LM ENOCHSupports

As Minister for Small Business, supported the bill to ensure Queensland subcontractors are fully protected by law with regard to payment of work, contrasting with the previous LNP government's removal of financial reporting.

This bill ensures that Queensland subcontractors are fully protected by the law with regard to the payment of work. These landmark laws—seen nowhere else in the country—set a new standard for Australia.2017-10-26View Hansard
12.39 pmMr MADDENSupports

Supported the bill, focusing on the amendments to the Retirement Villages Act that preserve QCAT review rights for transition plans.

The amendments ensured that significant changes in the operations of retirement villages occur in a manner that is clear, orderly and fair to the residents.2020-07-15View Hansard
3.46 pmHon. A PALASZCZUKSupports

As Premier, spoke in strong support of the bill as historic reform for the construction industry, citing Deloitte analysis showing $6.42 billion in extra economic activity over 20 years.

I am proud to rise and speak in support of the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Bill 2017 ... This is the right move. This is the right time. This is a historic reform.2017-10-26View Hansard
12.45 pmMr MICKELBERGMixed

Did not oppose the bill but expressed considerable concerns, citing constituents owed over $120,000 by a collapsed builder and criticising the minister for not responding to their correspondence.

Actions speak louder than words, so it is easy to understand why many Queenslanders have no confidence in the Palaszczuk Labor government to look out for the interests of tradies and other subcontractors.2020-07-15View Hansard
3.51 pmMs DAVISMixed

Stated the LNP would not oppose the legislation but criticised the Palaszczuk government's implementation as a 'botched' rollout, raising concerns from a local small builder about additional paperwork and compliance costs.

No-one disputes that anyone who provides a good service deserves to be paid and paid on time ... the LNP supports subbies being paid and we will not oppose this legislation. Unlike those opposite, we are committed to getting this right.2017-10-26View Hansard
12.48 pmMr KELLYSupports

Supported the bill as delivering fairness for subcontractors and small businesses, praising the government for listening to industry and taking time to get the reforms right.

At the core of this bill is the matter of fairness—fairness for subcontractors, fairness for small business—and only Labor is delivering that.2020-07-15View Hansard
3.56 pmMr BROWNSupports

Supported the bill, highlighting his electorate's large tradie population and criticising Master Builders' billboard campaign against the minister as politically motivated.

We are acting today. The Palaszczuk government has been in for one term and we have acted straightaway. We have not just seen the problem; we have seen the problem and consulted widely with the industry to ensure that we get the model right.2017-10-26View Hansard
12.55 pmMr MILLARMixed

Agreed subcontractors deserve to be paid but raised concerns about red tape burden on small family-owned construction businesses in regional Queensland, calling on the minister to review the impact on small contractors.

We also believe that a fair day's work deserves a fair day's pay. I think everybody in this House is in agreement with that.2020-07-15View Hansard
4.06 pmMr LANGBROEKMixed

Supported the principle of protecting subcontractor payments but raised significant concerns from a constituent about onerous payment schedule requirements and supported the LNP's proposed implementation panel.

That is why I am proud to be part of an LNP team that supports the principle of providing a safety net for subbies to ensure they are rightly paid the money they are owed ... but the bill in its original form will add lots of red tape and costs with no certainty that payments will be better protected.2017-10-26View Hansard
2.01 pmMr MOLHOEKMixed

Criticised the bill as providing false hope, arguing project bank accounts only cover large projects and at least 50-70 per cent of tradies are not covered, suggesting insurance-based protections would be more effective.

I feel that there are aspects of this legislation that are quite disingenuous. In a sense, it provides false hope.2020-07-15View Hansard
4.15 pmMr HARPERSupports

Supported the bill, sharing local examples of subcontractors in Thuringowa who had lost significant sums due to non-payment, and detailing the three-account project bank account structure.

I absolutely support the proposed bill, which has a range of measures to start cultural change within the building and construction industry in this state.2017-10-26View Hansard
2.09 pmDr ROWANMixed

Supported the bill but raised concerns about the adverse impacts of mandated project bank accounts on small to medium builders, relaying feedback from local builders concerned the model could shut down their businesses.

Local builders in my electorate of Moggill and across the western suburbs have contacted me and shared their very real concerns that such a model will have not only on their industry but also on their small business viability.2020-07-15View Hansard
4.22 pmHon. SJ HINCHLIFFESupports

Supported the bill, acknowledging that subcontractor non-payment had been a longstanding issue and congratulating the minister for delivering landmark reform to the $44 billion industry.

I know that as a consequence of this bill tradespeople in my electorate will get paid. I know that contractors who set a good example by paying their subcontractors will be rewarded by a system that makes sure that they all work on a level playing field.2017-10-26View Hansard
2.19 pmMs SCANLONSupports

Supported the bill, highlighting that dodgy operators withholding payment causes serious consequences for tradies in her Gold Coast community, including mental health impacts.

We on this side of the House believe that if you do the work you should get paid on time, in full, every time.2020-07-15View Hansard
4.27 pmMr POWERSupports

Supported the bill as creating a level playing field for powerless small subcontractors against exploitative big business in construction, citing personal stories from his electorate.

All we are asking is to create a level playing field for small businesses such as this hauler. Make it fair for the powerless.2017-10-26View Hansard
2.23 pmMr BENNETTMixed

As a registered builder, acknowledged the need for reform but criticised the government's approach as increasing red tape and costs without proven effectiveness, citing a damning Queensland Audit Office report on the QBCC.

It is hard to forget that the minister cherrypicked items out of reports and commissioned analyses bragging about cost benefits, because that clearly is not reflected by what stakeholders are telling us now.2020-07-15View Hansard
4.33 pmMr WELLINGTONSupports

As Independent, strongly supported the bill as landmark legislation resulting from his agreement with the Premier, condemning the Master Builders Association's billboard campaign and pledging to campaign for the minister's re-election if billboards were not replaced.

This bill is landmark legislation for Queensland. The issues in the building industry are well documented ... I thank our Premier and her government for acting and not allowing themselves to be bullied and intimidated by the big end of town.2017-10-26View Hansard
2.32 pmMr BOOTHMANMixed

Agreed everyone deserves to be paid for a fair day's work but raised concerns about extra red tape and paperwork burdening mum-and-dad builders, and criticised the QBCC as a toothless tiger.

Everybody deserves to get paid for a fair day's work. LNP members and I am sure government members all agree with this.2020-07-15View Hansard
4.43 pmHon. MC de BRENNISupports

As Minister for Housing and Public Works, closed the second reading debate in reply, defending the bill as comprehensive reform that will change the culture of the industry and criticising the LNP's record on minimum financial reporting.

This bill proposes a comprehensive package of reforms—not just one change but a suite of changes that will change the culture of this industry for good.2017-10-26View Hansard
2.37 pmHon. MC de BRENNISupports

Replied as minister, defending the phased approach to reform and citing support from trade subcontractor associations who called the reforms 'the biggest step forward on subbie payments in our nation's history'.

We are saying this to tradies across Queensland: you deserve to get paid in full, on time every time; you deserve the certainty of getting paid for the work that you do and you deserve a system that will not let you down.2020-07-15View Hansard
In Detail26 Oct 2017 – 15 July 2020View Hansard
Government amendmentPassed

Government amendments Nos 1 to 60 implementing committee recommendations, including: commencement by proclamation to allow phased introduction; revised definitions of project trust work and protected work; streamlined trust account frameworks; anti-avoidance measures for contract splitting; exemptions for professional design and advisory contracts; new definition of fire protection work and fire protection equipment; provisions for transitioning existing project bank accounts; new licence conditions for new licence classes; validation of fire collar installation work; statutory review of the role of property developers; and various typographical and drafting corrections.

Moved by Hon. MC de BRENNI
Government amendmentPassed

Government amendments Nos 1 to 143 moved en bloc during consideration in detail, making technical corrections and adjustments including: revising definitions; clarifying when building contracts become PBA contracts (requiring 30% price increase on amendment); setting timing for establishing project bank accounts (within 20 business days of first subcontract); clarifying order of priority rules for trust account withdrawals; modifying payment claim and response processes (including clause 76 so no payment schedule required if payment made in full within response period); setting a 25 business day maximum response period; inserting new s 200A requiring a review of the reforms by 1 September 2018; inserting s 200B confirming the Act does not prevent early payment; adjusting excluded individuals provisions; and strengthening the statutory defects liability period to 12 months.

Moved by Hon. MC de BRENNI
5.00 pmMr BENNETTMixed

As shadow minister, wrapped up the LNP's position during consideration in detail, describing the bill as probably the worst legislation to come before the House in its original form and committing the LNP to clean up the mess.

This is probably the worst piece of legislation that has come before the House in my time in the way it was originally drafted. It is an admission of failure of the minister that he has had to move so many amendments—144 amendments.2017-10-26View Hansard
Third Reading26 Oct 2017View Hansard
Royal Assent — Act 24 of 202024 May 2017View Hansard

Assent date: 19 May 2017

Referenced Entities

Legislation

Organisations

Programs & Schemes

Roles & Offices

Sectors Affected

Classified using AGIFT/ANZSIC Australian government standards