Planning and Development (Planning Court) Bill 2015
Plain English Summary
Overview
This bill would have created a separate Act to govern the Planning and Environment Court, which hears disputes about planning, development and environmental decisions. It moved the court out of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 into its own legislation, and expanded the powers of an Alternative Dispute Resolution Registrar to handle simpler matters cheaply. The bill was part of a 2015 LNP planning reform package and did not become law.
Who it affects
Mostly affects developers, councils, State agencies, community submitters and planning lawyers who use the court to resolve disputes about development approvals and enforcement. Ordinary Queenslanders are indirectly affected when neighbours, councils or developers take planning disputes to this court.
Key changes
- Pulls the Planning and Environment Court out of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and puts it in its own stand-alone Act
- Confirms the Chief Judge of the District Court is responsible for running the court, which continues to use District Court judges and registry staff
- Expands the ADR Registrar's power to hear and decide minor change applications and small technical matters, with each side paying their own costs
- Keeps appeals as a full rehearing ('de novo'), so the court re-decides the case on the evidence rather than just reviewing the original decision
- Keeps the court's broad discretion over costs and confirms it can order security for costs, including against non-parties who are really driving the litigation
- Sets the penalty for breaching ADR confidentiality at 50 penalty units and caps regulation-made penalties at 20 penalty units
Bill Story
The journey of this bill through Parliament, including debate and recorded votes.
▸Committee4 June 2015View Hansard
Referred to Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources Committee
▸Second Reading11 May 2016View Hansard
Moved the LNP's private member's planning bills, which had been introduced to restart the reform process that lapsed when the 54th Parliament was dissolved.
“The fact that we are debating these bills is directly attributable to the work of the LNP government and particularly the member for Callide.”— 2016-05-11View Hansard
▸In Detail11 May 2016View Hansard
That the amendment be agreed to
Vote on an LNP opposition amendment to retain adverse costs provisions for planning court appeals, which the government opposed in favour of restoring submitters' rights to appeal without fear of costs being awarded against them.
The motion was defeated.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (42)
Noes (43)
That the amendments be agreed to
Vote on further LNP opposition amendments to the government's planning bills, which were defeated by the government with crossbench support.
The motion was defeated.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (40)
Noes (45)
Referenced Entities
Legislation
Organisations
Sectors Affected
Classified using AGIFT/ANZSIC Australian government standards