Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill
Plain English Summary
Overview
This bill amends Australia's national health practitioner regulation laws to better protect the public from practitioners who have been struck off or found to have committed sexual misconduct. It was introduced following agreement by all Australian Health Ministers but lapsed at the end of the 57th Parliament and did not become law.
Who it affects
Patients and healthcare consumers benefit from greater transparency about practitioners with sexual misconduct findings. People who report concerns about health practitioners gain stronger legal protections from retaliation.
Key changes
- Cancelled or disqualified health practitioners must obtain a reinstatement order from a tribunal before they can apply to be re-registered, creating a nationally consistent process across all states and territories
- Information about practitioners found by a tribunal to have committed professional misconduct involving sexual misconduct must be permanently recorded on the public register, including details of the finding and sanctions
- It becomes an offence to threaten, intimidate, dismiss, or retaliate against someone who reports a health practitioner, with penalties of up to $60,000 for individuals and $120,000 for corporations
- Non-disclosure agreements are void to the extent they prevent someone from reporting concerns about a health practitioner to regulators, and it is an offence to enter into such an agreement without clearly stating the person's right to report
- In Queensland, these protections are implemented through both the national law and amendments to the Health Ombudsman Act to suit the state's co-regulatory arrangements
Bill Story
The journey of this bill through Parliament, including debate and recorded votes.
▸Committee11 May 2022 – 11 Sept 2024View Hansard
Referred to Health and Environment Committee
▸In Detail13 Oct 2022View Hansard
▸2 clause votes (all passed)
Vote on clause 100
Vote on retaining clause 100, which contains related public statement powers for the Health Ombudsman. The LNP opposed on the same natural justice grounds as clause 20. Retained 50-37.
The clause was kept in the bill.
A vote on whether a specific clause should remain in the bill as written.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (50)
Noes (37)
Vote on clause 20
Vote on retaining clause 20, which gives the Health Ombudsman power to make public statements about health practitioners before investigations are completed. The LNP, KAP, PHON and independent opposed this clause on natural justice grounds, but it was retained 50-37.
The clause was kept in the bill.
A vote on whether a specific clause should remain in the bill as written.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (50)
Noes (37)
▸Third Reading13 Oct 2022View Hansard
That the bill, as amended, be now read a third time
Final passage vote on the Health Practitioner bill. The LNP voted in favour despite opposing specific clauses, while KAP, PHON and the independent voted against the entire bill. Passed 82-5.
The motion passed.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (82)
That the long title of the bill be agreed to
Procedural vote on the long title. The Greens joined the ayes (having not been recorded in the third reading division). Passed 84-5 with only KAP, PHON and independent opposing.
The motion passed.