Appropriation (Parliament) (2020-2021) Bill 2020
Plain English Summary
Overview
This bill appropriates $101.8 million for Queensland Parliament's operations in the 2020-21 financial year. It also provides $50.9 million in interim funding for early 2021-22 so parliament can keep running until the next annual budget bill passes.
Who it affects
This is administrative legislation that affects the operation of parliament itself. It has no direct impact on citizens beyond authorising the expenditure of public funds on parliamentary operations.
Key changes
- Appropriates $101,823,000 for the Legislative Assembly and parliamentary service for 2020-21
- Authorises $50,912,000 in interim supply for 2021-22 until the next appropriation bill passes
- Repeals the Appropriation (Parliament) Act 2018 and Appropriation (Parliament) Act (No. 2) 2018, which are no longer needed
Bill Story
The journey of this bill through Parliament, including debate and recorded votes.
▸Committee3 Dec 2020View Hansard
Referred to Economics and Governance Committee
The Economics and Governance Committee examined the 2020-21 budget estimates for the Legislative Assembly and Parliamentary Service. After reviewing budget papers, pre-hearing questions on notice, and evidence from the Speaker and other witnesses at a public hearing on 7 December 2020, the committee recommended that the proposed expenditures be agreed to without amendment. Non-government members filed a Statement of Reservation expressing concerns about debt levels, the truncated estimates process, and broader government accountability issues.
Key findings (5)
- The proposed appropriation of $101.823 million for 2020-21 represented an increase of $1.295 million over the previous year, primarily due to changes to members' allowances and deferred project funding.
- Total planned capital expenditure increased from $8.7 million to $13.6 million, including upgrades to the Parliamentary Annexe, completion of the Parliament House fire protection programme, and electorate office improvements.
- The committee examined the impact of COVID-19 on parliamentary operations, including the establishment of a virtual parliament for remote member participation.
- The Parliamentary Service was developing a new three-year digital strategy and implementing measures to address emerging cyber security risks.
- The committee noted the implementation of a formal Reconciliation Action Plan to promote cultural respect, equality, and opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Recommendations (1)
- The committee recommends that the proposed expenditures, as detailed in the Appropriation (Parliament) (2020-2021) Bill 2020 for the committee's areas of responsibility, be agreed to by the Legislative Assembly without amendment.
Committee report tabled
▸Second Reading3 Dec 2020View Hansard
▸15 members spoke6 support7 oppose2 mixed
As Leader of the Opposition, argued the budget locks Queensland into a generation of borrowing for recurrent spending rather than building infrastructure, criticising the government for promising $4 billion in borrowings before the election but delivering $28 billion, and forecast unemployment remaining the highest in the nation.
“This budget locks us into a generation of borrowing for today, not building for tomorrow.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Criticised the budget for cutting operational funding to several hospital and health services during a pandemic, reducing medical research funding, and failing to deliver any new funding for the Mudgeeraba electorate west of the M1.
“This budget was not only a budget of broken promises and debt deceit; it was also a missed opportunity for Labor to kickstart the economy.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Supported the budget for delivering job-creating projects in regional Queensland, highlighting strong economic indicators in Central Queensland including low unemployment, booming house prices, and significant investments in health, education, and tourism infrastructure in the Keppel electorate.
“I am very proud that consistently the Palaszczuk government has delivered the bulk of spending on new job-creating projects outside of Brisbane.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Supported the budget for delivering road upgrades, school improvements, and train manufacturing jobs in Maryborough, arguing the government understands what Queenslanders want: health care, jobs, and education.
“On this side of the House, we know what Queensland people want. They want health care. They want jobs. They want education.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Opposed the budget as smoke and mirrors, criticising the government for hiding the true debt figure of $130 billion before the election, failing to provide a stimulus package for businesses, and breaching all six of its own fiscal principles.
“This government is not doing that. They are purely borrowing this money to pay for their increased Public Service and to put pens and paper on desks and fuel in cars.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Supported the budget for delivering infrastructure and health investments in the Bancroft electorate, arguing the economy is on the right track with employment and retail sales back to pre-COVID levels.
“Only Labor treats Queenslanders like Queenslanders. We see them as members of a society, not as members of a corporation.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Opposed the budget as offering no new investment for Central Queensland west of Rockhampton and Mackay, criticising the government for lacking economic leadership and failing to invest in agricultural training, the Longreach Pastoral College, or the Emerald agricultural college.
“This is a budget of no surprises and, therefore, very little new hope.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Opposed the budget for breaking the government's $4 billion borrowing promise, failing to commit to restoring Paradise Dam to full capacity, lacking ambition on jobs, and providing insufficient investment in the Bundaberg port and hospital.
“The government asked for a mandate on the back of the $4 billion increase in borrowings and now it is seven times that figure. It is a clear breach of trust.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Supported the budget for delivering satellite hospitals for Bribie Island and Caboolture, major road upgrades including the Bruce Highway, school infrastructure, mobile police beats, and small business grants in the Pumicestone electorate.
“I promised that I would work hard to help make Pumicestone better for us, that I would work every day for infrastructure upgrades, strong public services and local jobs. I am proud that this is exactly what this budget does.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Acknowledged positive investments including $6 million in school funding and $200 million in road funding for the Hill electorate and supported local train manufacturing in Maryborough, but criticised the government for previously closing rail workshops and privatising rail operations.
“Manufacturing locally is how it should be, rather than importing goods from overseas.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Acknowledged some positive investments such as Big Rocks Weir and CopperString but criticised the budget for spending on social infrastructure rather than economy-building projects, arguing the government lacks the vision to build transformative infrastructure like Hells Gates Dam or the Galilee rail line.
“Debt is not always a bad thing, but it must be spent on the right things.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Supported the budget for investing in road upgrades, trade training, school infrastructure, and a new justice precinct in the Macalister electorate, praising the Premier's COVID-19 leadership and Queensland's position as the only state to recover all jobs lost during the pandemic.
“We committed to delivering jobs; we committed to growing the economy out of this global pandemic. This budget does this and more.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Opposed the budget as the biggest 'nothing' budget ever delivered, criticising the $28 billion borrowing blowout with little infrastructure to show for it, and highlighting the lack of investment in the Condamine electorate including no progress on the Acland mine approval or a secondary school business case.
“At a time when Queensland needed a budget full of infrastructure projects, this government has provided precious little in the line of major projects to simulate our economy and get our state back up and running.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Supported the budget for delivering significant investments in the Bundaberg electorate including the new hospital business case, flood levee, Isis Highway upgrades, TAFE agriculture centre, school infrastructure, and housing construction, contrasting with the LNP's lack of commitments during the election.
“This is a budget built on the strong health response to COVID-19, a response that is enabling a strong economic recovery plan that has delivered a budget that is delivering for the people of Bundaberg.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
Opposed the budget for providing zero job-creating projects in Surfers Paradise despite 13.5 per cent youth unemployment, criticising the debt trajectory from $85 billion to $130 billion and the government's failure to support Gold Coast businesses and travel agents affected by border closures.
“In the 'Creating jobs on the Gold Coast' budget document, there are no job-creating projects in Surfers Paradise.”— 2020-12-03View Hansard
▸In Detail23 Feb 2021 – 21 Aug 2024View Hansard
That the amendment be agreed to
Vote on the government's amendment to the LNP's crime statistics motion, replacing LNP criticism of rising crime under Labor with government statistics showing decreases in juvenile offence rates and criticising the former Newman LNP government's police cuts. This was a separate motion debated during the estimates session, not directly related to the Appropriation Bills.
The motion passed.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (47)
Noes (37)
That the amendment be agreed to
Vote on an amendment during the Appropriation Bills cognate debate. The government amendment was agreed to with 50 ayes to 35 noes.
The motion passed.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (50)
Noes (35)
Vote on a motion
Vote on a procedural motion during the budget estimates debate session, related to the adoption of committee reports.
The motion was agreed to.
A formal vote on whether to accept a proposal — this could be the bill itself, an amendment, or another motion.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (49)
Noes (33)
That the motion, as amended, be agreed to
Final vote on the amended crime statistics motion as rewritten by the government, noting police numbers, juvenile offence reductions and condemning the former Newman LNP government's record on police. ALP voted in favour; LNP, KAP and independent voted against.
The motion passed.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (47)
Noes (33)
That the motion, as amended, be agreed to
Vote on the amended motion during the Appropriation Bills cognate debate. The motion as amended was agreed to with 50 ayes to 35 noes.
The motion passed.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (50)
Noes (35)
▸1 procedural vote
Vote to grant leave
Procedural vote to grant leave for a government motion during the budget estimates Consideration in Detail debate.
Permission was granted.
A vote on whether to grant permission — for example, to introduce an amendment or vary normal procedure.
▸Show individual votesHide individual votes
Ayes (50)
Noes (33)
▸Third Reading24 Feb 2021View Hansard
Vote on a motion
Vote on government motion setting estimates committee hearing dates and times, brought forward to accommodate the Premier's potential travel to the Tokyo Olympics. The LNP and Greens opposed due to lack of consultation and reduced scrutiny time.
The motion was agreed to.
A formal vote on whether to accept a proposal — this could be the bill itself, an amendment, or another motion.